User talk:Law/February 2009
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The WPVG Newsletter (January 2009)
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 00:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Re: ACB
Account creation blocked. Used to be used a lot in block messages, not so much now. — neuro(talk) 20:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
re: Shane Hurlbut
Thank you for the kind words. Cirt (talk) 04:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I like to do a lot in that first revision. :P - Cirt (talk) 05:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Did you know...
Hello! I noticed that you've been reviewing a lot of nominations at the DYK suggestions page. Thank you for your help, and I hope you will continue to contribute! As you know, you don't need to be an administrator to review hooks or to move hooks to Next update, so your help is more than welcome.
You may already be familiar with the DYK rules by now, but in case you aren't, you can check out the official rules and the "unwritten" rules. You may also want to look into some useful tools that can allow you to review nominations more quickly: the Cut & Paste character counter is a helpful JavaScript to calculate the length of hooks, and User:Dr pda/prosesize.js is a script you can install on your own Wikipedia account for more heavy-duty article length calculating.
The best way to learn is by doing, but here is also a quick reference of the things to check for each hook you review:
Quick Reference
|
Thanks again for your help! I look forward to continuing to work with you at DYK, and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me or anyone else at DYK. Now get to reviewing some noms! 13:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)~
rʨanaɢ (formerly Politizer)talk/contribs 13:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's a great template. I'm going to anchor it somewhere and use it as a reference. Law shoot! 01:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Re:DYK nomination of My Life as a 10-Year-Old Boy
Hello, could you please clarify what needs citing? The entire section has nine citations, almost any one of which will prove the statement. -- Scorpion0422 23:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello
Greetings, Law. I just wanted to check in and see how your Wikipedia experience was progressing. If you'd like to send me an email sometime, I am reachable via the 'Email this user' link. :) GlassCobra 19:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hello! Experience here has been very positive. DYK has been a great source of fun when I'm trying to dodge homework. Thanks for checking in. Maybe we can work on an article. Lately all I do is create articles about bars I find. LOL. Law shoot! 01:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Sabre (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC) |
DYK for Kansas City Barbeque
--Dravecky (talk) 22:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Tilted Kilt
Re: DYK images
Yeah, looks to me like that image is incorrectly tagged. I would say the best thing to do is remove the image from T:TDYK; I have already removed the CC tag and will leave a message with the uploader. Thanks for the message, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 03:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hm...from what I can tell, it seems to be an article that was redirected because it was nothing more than a junky plot summary, and has since been rewritten like a real article. I don't think we have specific rules on this because it doesn't happen very often, but my intuition is that the rewrite has added a lot of good content and sources, so even if it's not technically 5x the length it was before the redirect, it's still a good expansion...plus, it was a redirect for almost 2 years, so I would be willing to IAR on this one and consider it "new." But in cases like this I think it's pretty much up to your personal judgment.
- Hope this helps, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 04:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)