Laxanan

Laxanan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Laxanan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Laxanan, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Elysia and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Zaigham's peer review for Bedrock

The lead section for this article is very dry and not really helpful. It explains very briefly what bedrock is but doesn't really provide any more information and is not very helpful. More information on the types of bedrock or what occurs during weathering for example are things that should be included in this section. The structure of this article is hard to address as this article is very bare. There is only one heading labelled "In soil science" and this section has almost nothing in it. To make this article good, lots more information should be added to this section and more headings should be provided. The coverage with what is provided is fairly balanced. However more information on the soil science section would greatly add to the article. The content is neutral as there are no clashing opinions seen. Sources are well dated and are reliable as they are seen to be from peer-reviewed articles.

Overall, the article is still bare and in the early stages of editing but once the considerations above are addressed and more information is put into the article, then the article will be good.

Zaighamalavi (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Zaigham Alavi