Your submission at Articles for creation: NASA Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET) (November 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Lear419! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: NASA Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET) (November 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 13:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit reversion

edit

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: OSRMT (December 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrowssapSMM was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DrowssapSMM 03:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of OSRMT (software) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OSRMT (software), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OSRMT (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the notice. It seems like random editors wants to delete the page for reasons I don't understand. OSRMT seems like something that should be in Wikipedia but I'm tired of wasting time on this process. Let the chips fall where they may. I'm done with it and Wikipedia. Lear419 (talk) 15:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:NASA Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET)

edit

  Hello, Lear419. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NASA Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:NASA Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET)

edit
 

Hello, Lear419. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "NASA Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply