Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Grammer (June 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Leesada! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Grammer has been accepted

edit
 
Harry Grammer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at New Earth (organization). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Leesada. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Harry Grammer, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 04:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Harry Grammer.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Mr. Grammer appears to qualify for a Wikipedia article (see WP:BLP and WP:GNG) but the prose needs to be toned down so it does not appear to be a shameless advertisement for his foundation.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:23, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Harry Grammer for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Grammer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Grammer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 11:31, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply