Legalaidclinicssdlc

Welcome!

Hello, Legalaidclinicssdlc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gudha (Jhajjar), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FrankDev (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gudha (Jhajjar)

The article Gudha (Jhajjar) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced non-notable location

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FrankDev (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Legalaidclinicssdlc. You have new messages at FrankDev's talk page.
Message added 05:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FrankDev (talk) 05:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Redlinked categories

Please stop adding redlinked categories to numerous South Haryana articles. - Sitush (talk) 07:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC) ok sir, Sorry I have stopped

You should not really be contributing at all. It is obvious that you are a sockpuppet of Austereraj, who has been indefinitely blocked for using multiple accounts. For example, your efforts at Meerpur (Rewari) were simply not acceptable. - Sitush (talk) 07:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Please I will not violate the rules of wikipedia and club my accounts and help me in getting rid of called as sockpuppet, I shall be thankful to you forever, Happy New Year, I only created because you block the and then and I want to become good wikipedian like youLegalaidclinicssdlc (talk) 08:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC) How I can delete my other accounts and want to keep only one honestly and and really contribute according to your policies. Legalaidclinicssdlc (talk) 08:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

What you need to do is abandon this account and any others that you have opened. Then login as Austereraj and post an unblocked request at User talk:Austereraj. In that request you will need to address the issues that caused you to be blocked in the first place, ie: sockpuppeting. I suggest that you read WP:SOCK thoroughly before making a request because that way you can write your request in a way that addresses the policy. - Sitush (talk) 11:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Austereraj. Thank you. This is for reference. The user has already been blocked by Elockid per confession here Sitush (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Legalaidclinicssdlc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was not aware that creating new account is against your policy, I did not pay heed to your notification, please give me second chance as I have made request you more than 6 months, continuously, I shall be thankful to you, Even God gives second chance and you are not giving me another chance, I am a big fan of wikipedia and I have given my hundreds of hour on sitting the same platform

Decline reason:

You have already been told (by Sitush) what to do. I suggest that you do it. We virtually never unblock sockpuppets. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Legalaidclinicssdlc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

[nil I was not aware that creating new account is against your policy, I did not pay heed to your notification, please give me second chance as I have made request you more than 6 months, continuously, I shall be thankful to you, Even God gives second chance and you are not giving me another chance, I am a big fan of wikipedia and I have given my hundreds of hour on sitting the same platform] ([[User talk:I was not aware that creating new account is against your policy, I did not pay heed to your notification, please give me second chance as I have made request you more than 6 months, continuously, I shall be thankful to you, Even God gives second chance and you are not giving me another chance, I am a big fan of wikipedia and I have given my hundreds of hour on sitting the same platform|talk]] · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

• Blocking administrator: not provided.

---

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)