User talk:Legis/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

File permission problem with File:Conrad Maduro.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Conrad Maduro.jpg, which you've attributed to http://bvinews.com/bvi/the-super-seven-educators-are/conrad-maduro/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 09:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Leader of the Opposition (British Virgin Islands)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Leader of the Opposition (British Virgin Islands), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://pt.cyclopaedia.net/wiki/Leaders_of_the_Opposition_(UK).

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:59, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to British Virgin Islands general election, 1979 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {Reflist}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the British Virgin Islands may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:C de Castro and I Fonseca - busts.JPG|thumb|right|250px|The busts of Isaac Fonseca and Carlton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roy Harrigan

Hello, Legis. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Roy Harrigan, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Roy Harrigan to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, JacobiJonesJr (talk) 01:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Assembly of the British Virgin Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smith v Croft (No 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial assistance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hello, Good to know you are a lawyer too! Happy editing! Sign my Guestbook. The Pakistan (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hi. Mohammad Ahmadvand is greatandhis work is interesting— Preceding unsigned comment added by User:188.158.187.75 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 11 October 2014‎

Hi. Regarding your proposal for deletion of the entry Mohammad Ahmadvand, it should be considered that Mohammad Ahmadvand is a truly good expert in his field because he has had many publications as well as AN INNOVATION in his field. Furthermore, he is also a journalist and a writer which gives him a high stand among individuals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.255.85.69 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ray L. Watts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Dr. Watts accepted the position of Senior Vice President and Dean of the School of Medicine at UAB], and later was named to the James C. Lee Jr. Endowed Chair.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uab.edu/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Journeyman quarterback may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• <br>[[Calgary Stampeders] (1994-1998)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Fry J

I have know idea why Fry J redirects to Edward Fry. Could you please pop over to Talk:Fry J and explain why? Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Will do. --Legis (talk - contribs) 05:32, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Robin Stummer/proposed deletion

Editor LEGIS has made a series of basic but serious errors in his comments supporting his decision to move the article Robin Stummer for deletion. Correct information is widely accessible online. Cornerstone magazine was in existence for nine years, not two, as LEGIS states. It did not "go bust", as LEGIS alleges. It was apparently very successful, financially, throughout its entire existence. Robin Stummer, the subject of the article, is not a minor journalist. He is cited widely across Wiki, as LEGIS should know. The article is not promotional, it is factual. There is no commercial aspect to the article at all, in any way. It accords with and matches closely similar entries for similar journalists which are presently online through Wiki and have been legible for years. LEGIS should retract his factually inaccurate comments, and this article should be allowed to remain on Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bealey3399 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Robin Stummer - article editing

The content of the Wikipedia article Robin Stummer is familiar to me, as I am Robin Stummer, and this article is about my work. I have been reading the comments of Wiki editor Legis, and his reasoning for suggesting that the article about me should be deleted. As has already been noted, Legis has made some very surprising errors in his reasoning. In his comment on the article he has published some factual inaccuracies, as part of his rationale for suggesting its deletion. It has been pointed out, in the article and elsewhere online, that Cornerstone magazine existed from 2004 until 2012. Yet Legis claims that it was published for only two years. An astonishing and inexplicable error. For eight years it was a leading title in its field. Next, Legis states that the magazine 'went bust'. There is no source for this untruth. It seems entirely to have been made up by Legis. The opposite was the case, as is widely known. The magazine was well known and highly successful, in revenue and critical terms, throughout its existence. To some eyes it might border on defamatory to suggest otherwise. So, Legis. Where does your information come from about the magazine's financial standing? Would you like to share your 'it went bust' source for this with Wiki users? On my own standing in my profession, Wiki itself carries many citations to my work, readable in existing articles covering a great range of subjects. Further, the article is in keeping in tone and content with existing wiki articles on journalists, some of whom I know well. It is very hard to avoid the conclusion that there is a rush-to-deletion of my article. And it would be interesting to know why. So, would you please inform Wiki users and myself of how and precisely when you picked up that article on me for editing; what considerations came into play during your editing; why you are advocating the censoring of bona fide information from Wiki; how long you spent reading the article (as you have made some glaring simple errors, it can't have been that long). Wiki users deserve some clear and prompt answers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slocbottle (talk • contribs) 13:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks both, for your messages. Very quickly:

• • I picked up on your article because I am part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories which deals with newly created articles which have never been put into categories. I read them and try to categorise them (which I did, in your case). However, where I notice other issues in relation to them, I will tag them as appropriate. In relation to the Robin Stummer article I thought it lacked sufficient notability and so I listed it as an article for a deletion discussion. I worked on about 30 articles over the weekend that were previously uncategorised trying to help clean them up, and I think I listed three of them for AfD discussions. I had never heard the name Robin Stummer before yesterday, and I have no axe to grind. I just apply the guidelines in WP:NOT as best I am able.
  • You may be reading too much into the timing. Most articles which are listed for deletion are listed fairly quickly after they are created because of the initial review process. If you take a look at a random selection of articles which are subject to AfD discussion (see: Category:AfD debates) you will see that they are all pretty much newly created articles.
  • Do remember that AfD is a discussion process. It is a not a fait accompli. It was simply my opinion on the basis of review which I pushed out to the wider group for discussion. Unless it is reviewed by a majority others who support my view it won't be deleted.
  • The reference to the magazine going bust was from the source which I indicated in my post listing reasons for the AfD. The linked article indicated that the magazine ceased to be published in 2012 and that Robin Stummer had received a writ from the previous publishers from keeping the website alive. If I made an error, it was a good faith error, and you should feel free to correct it by commenting on the discussion page.
  • I appreciate you taking the time to post on my page and provide your comments directly, but I don't have any more power than any other editor. It is up for discussion now, and you should make these arguments on the relevant page for discussing the deletion proposal and I would encourage you to go there and repeat your arguments. No mad rush - these things take time to reach consensus, but definitely do post your comments.
  • Thanks for clarifying that you are the subject of the article (User:Slocbottle). Can I just very gently remind you of Wikipedia policy on Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia.

--Legis (talk - contribs) 01:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit request

Hi, can you please change Chloe McConville's surname to Fenton, this has been her surname since birth and if you check out the official Dance Mum's website it has been changed there too, Many thanks Gary Fenton — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Gary Fenton (talk • contribs) 22:48, 9 October 2014‎

Redlink user pages

You just created a bland "that's the joke" one-line user page for User:Allyourbasesrbelongtous with an edit summary "sorry, I hate redlink user pages"? Editors aren't meant to edit other people's user pages just because they don't like something. --McGeddon (talk) 08:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5