Leigh richardson
Welcome!
editHello, Leigh richardson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Caisson (lock gate), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RegistryKey(RegEdit) 15:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Caisson (lock gate)
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Caisson (lock gate). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Caisson lock. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Caisson lock – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 15:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Just wanted to let you know that AndyTheGrump and I realized an error in communication and your article has been restored. Thank you for your contributions! RegistryKey(RegEdit) 18:35, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Leigh, sorry about this but I seem to have trampled your article at Caisson (lock gate). I'd added this to the Caisson disambig page and had been planning to write it for some time, but hadn't got round to it. In the recent edit-warring to protect WP from the danger of creating articles I noticed that something had been deleted, but didn't realise until just now that it was your draft article. I slapped something together quickly over lunch.
Please help fill in the gaps. In particular it's light on content for:
- the early development of ship caissons – your sandbox looks like promising sources for some of this.
- the widespread use of sliding caissons in naval dockyards in particular. Vernon-Harcourt could be a source for this.
- The use of an temporary outer ship caisson during repair work on sliding caisson. See [1] (which is old, PD and could be added to Commons) for a source.
Sorry for all the mess here today. I hope it won't put you off editing - there's a shortage of editors for maritime history, especially for the nuts and bolts rather than the high profile ship biographies. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Sandbox article
editHi Leigh. I have made a few tweaks to your sandbox article on Caissons, to show how things are done. You might like to read the Wikipedia:Manual of Style which has some pointers to how things are done. I have put one of the books into a cite book template, to show how that works, and then used a short-footnote {sfn} template to refer to it. You will need to provide inline refs like that, or someone will come along and slap a "This article contains a list of sources but it is not clear what refers to what" tag on it. If you need any help, do drop me a line. PS: to sign posts on talk pages use four tildes ~~~~. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)