Leo12350
Unblock The IP address
edit
- Leo12350 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "AnonymousPerson123546". The reason given for AnonymousPerson123546's block is: "Vandalism-only account".
Decline reason: The autoblock appears to be legitimate. Can you explain why you are operating from the same address as that vandal, and why we shouldn't block this account, too? Yamla (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I have the same IP address as the vandal, and he uses my computer sometimes too. Maybe I should stop him from using my PC. -Leo12350 (🗣️) 19:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes. Do so immediately. Any further vandalism from either account and I'll block this one directly. So long as they do not sign in, you should be able to edit in 24 hours. --Yamla (talk) 19:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Okay, thanks, I won't let the vandal use me anymore. : ) -Leo12350 (🗣️) 20:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 |
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en wikimedia.org with your username and appeal.Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement). |
Hello Administrators of Wikipedia, I am letting this message go to show my apology for doing something called "sockmastering" or "Sockpuppettry." I now acknowledge that what I did was wrong. I will not use my sockpuppetted account anymore, and will not make further sockpuppet accounts, and go on to be a better editor. -Leo12350 (🗣️) 22:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- You already told us you'd stop, and then demonstrated this was untrue. Your best bet at this point is to follow WP:SO and then account for your false statements above, such as claiming that you weren't behind the other account. --Yamla (talk) 22:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
UTRS 41636 declined
editUTRS appeal #41636 has been declined.
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. I'm afraid that having read your talk page, I have no confidence in your assurances. I see that Yamla has recommended you wait six months and then seek unblocking under the Standard Offer. I concur. During that time, I suggest editing constructively on other Wikiepdias. If you can establish the ability to edit constructively, it will weigh in your favor. Be warned though. Many of them have "one strike rules". As you still have talk page access, please request unblocking there, six months from now. Best. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC)- OK, summary, you said edit goodly on other wikipedias not the English one, and if I edit constructively, you'll unblock me. Ok, thanks for the advice. -Leo12350 (blah blah blah) (what i did) 17:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Did not say I'd unblock you. You will be eligible for unblock consideration. You must not sock or edit not logged in. A checkuser will need to review any request to unblock. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, that sounds better. -Leo12350 (blah blah blah) (what i did) 17:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)