LeonardSondheim
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 17:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
LeonardSondheim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You have no evidence that I am User:Mamma Rose. The only thing was that an IP told you I was Mamma Rose. Does that make any sense? Exactly. If you want to convincingly block me for *whatever*, you could at least do a fake investigation. Or is this a joke? Do you welcome users like this to scare them into not doing anything wrong? If so, it worked! I'll be sure never to evade blocks.
Decline reason:
Investigation done. Checkuser has 
Confirmed you are Mamma Rose/S. S. Miami. Happy now? Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sincere apology
edit LeonardSondheim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes, I am S.S. Miami, Biaytock& Bloom, and StyroFome. I am truly sorry for my actions and "abuse of multiple accounts." Everyone failed to notice that since I started Mamma Rose, I haven't uploaded any bad images. I have turned over a new leaf, and want to continue on with my helpful contributions (you can't deny that I have improved Wikipedia). That's why I started Mamma Rose and now LeonardSondheim. If you unblock me, I will agree to follow a set of rules (ie: like probation). Once again, I am truly sorry, as I have changed my ways and haven't committed any copyright violations since StryoFome. I hope you can see beyond my past and look to a brighter future. I appreciate any response you give, be it "decline" or "approve."
Decline reason:
See my response below. –MuZemike 19:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You want to follow our rules... by breaking them through evading your block. Sure, sounds like you had a great plan. Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'm truly sorry. I just want to have a clean, fresh start.--LeonardSondheim (talk) 18:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Admins have done the "probation" and "fresh start" with sockpuppeteers before.--LeonardSondheim (talk) 18:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- But this does not apply in this situation. You have willfully deceived the community several times before, and your attempts at a "fresh start" are merely attempts to evade past scrutiny. There is the standard offer, but you are nowhere near that, and, from looking at your past contributions, you show no will to admit anything of what you did wrong. –MuZemike 19:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Admins have done the "probation" and "fresh start" with sockpuppeteers before.--LeonardSondheim (talk) 18:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'm truly sorry. I just want to have a clean, fresh start.--LeonardSondheim (talk) 18:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
LeonardSondheim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes, I am S.S. Miami, Biaytock& Bloom, and StyroFome. I am truly sorry for my actions and "abuse of multiple accounts." Everyone failed to notice that since I started Mamma Rose, I haven't uploaded any bad images. I have turned over a new leaf, and want to continue on with my helpful contributions (you can't deny that I have improved Wikipedia). That's why I started Mamma Rose and now LeonardSondheim. If you unblock me, I will agree to follow a set of rules (ie: like probation). Once again, I am truly sorry, as I have changed my ways and haven't committed any copyright violations since StryoFome. I hope you can see beyond my past and look to a brighter future. I appreciate any response you give, be it "decline" or "approve."
Decline reason:
You lied an hour ago; there was little opportunity to build trust since then. You're always free to explore the standard offer, as noted above. Until then, I don't see any reason to unblock, and proposals that end in "or else" seem poorly constructed. Kuru (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I mean, come one, consider this to the alternative! Did you notice how many articles I've updated altogether? Yeah. I've changed and I'm willing to abide by some restrictions (ie:I will never upload another image again, etc.) but you don't seem to realize that the alternative is a never-ending list of sockpuppets! Before this whole chain began, I even asked for a fresh start, but the admins said "No," and now look what they've got on their hands!.--LeonardSondheim (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)