Lesser Shadow
Welcome...
Hello, Lesser Shadow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
I have also replied to your post at the Drawing board.
Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 23:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Big head mode
editA {{prod}} template has been added to the article Big head mode, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Bduke 12:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not an administrator, so I'll let time do the job. I just came across it while tracking the edits of a vandal. After reversing him, I realised there was not much in the article to justify keeping it. --Bduke 23:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I am afraid I may have lead the above vandel there after he deliberatly deleted information about which he has no previous knowledge and also did not put anything on the discusion page and did not ask for sources. In reverting the article he also erazed other information which was definatly sourcable and also things like spelling mistakes/grammer errors which were corrected before he messed withthe page which is not in any of his projects or his country or his area which appears to be science. I also believe that he is a glove puppet.