User talk:Lexiutk/sandbox

(background):

great use of facts and supporting details. be more clear on thesis though. overall great paragraph.

This section is really clear and well organized making it easy to read and understand. The only thing that seemed to be missing was some citations. Typically you want to cite information that is not you own (or that is not common knowledge). An example I found that could use a citation was the last sentence in the first paragraph that states the causes of the economic crisis. Nathalyhunter (talk)

Political Effects

I thought your information was great, but could be added to. Your section could use more sources to back up your information or add to it.Lexiutk (talk) 01:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Political Regrowth

I liked your section and the detail, but you focus a lot on Mexico. La Década Perdida encompassed all Latin American countries, not just Mexico. Although Mexico might be a great example, the political regrowth happened in other countries as well. I liked that you had resources to back up your information, but you do use a lot of quotes in your section. Lexiutk (talk) 01:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

The strengths in this section were the amount of detail and specific examples used. However, I would consider renaming the section as the meaning of this title seemed unclear; it may be beneficial to tie the tittle to Mexico since this section focused heavily on Mexico as an example. Additionally, if it is possible, tie this section back to prior sections of “Economic Reforms” and “Political Effects.” Lastly, this section is still missing some proof-reading for grammar mistakes and a closer look at the language used. Nathalyhunter (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)