Censure

edit

I'm pretty sure it was correct - the organization issued a reprimand, they didn't actually go in to their operations and impinge on their free speech. See censure vs. censor. Let me know if I'm interpreting this incorrectly. Tan | 39 15:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replied on talk page LicenseFee (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

St Augustine's High School, Redditch

edit

  Hi LicenseFee! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by its parent project as needing either a little more attention to style, updating, or further development. If you can help with these minor issues please see Talk:St Augustine's High School, Redditch, and leave any comments there.--Kudpung (talk) 01:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply