Your submission at Articles for creation: Adult Learning Australia (June 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Lifelonglearning1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Assistance with referencing

edit

Hi there. You appear to be interested in a topic that is a current content gap related to Australian education. If you would like some assistance on referencing articles and editing guidelines feel free to get in touch offline: pru.mitchell@wikimedia.org.au — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pru.mitchell (talkcontribs) 08:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adult Learning Australia (July 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Adult Learning Australia concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adult Learning Australia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Adult Learning Australia

edit
 

Hello, Lifelonglearning1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adult Learning Australia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adult Learning Australia (October 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. SITH (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the feedback. I fail to see how this is a copyright breach. This information was originally taken from our website. It is information about us as you can see where it says below "We":

Adult Learning Australia (ALA) is the national peak body for the Adult and Community Education field/s. We are a not-for-profit entity with both organisational and individual members in all States and Territories who reflect the diversity of adult and community education.

I don't understand your feedback and why this page has now been deleted. This has nothing to do with a copyright breach. Here is the information from our website https://ala.asn.au/about-us/

It's a copyright issue because content is copyrighted at moment of creation/publishing, and Wikipedia uses an irrevocable copyleft licence (CC-By_SA 3.0) that is incompatible with standard "all rights reserved" copyright. We cannot accept copyrighted text because of this incompatibility, and due to how the law works the licence for the content must be specified at time of creation (hence why the footer of every page on Wikipedia declares the licence and the edit window likewise declares the licencing). Just because you wrote it or have permission to use it from your employer does not mean Wikipedia can use it, because permission must be given to whoever is hosting the material (Wikipedia), and as a matter of principles and licencing Wikipedia will not seek or accept such permission under any circumstances. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Onward to 2020 05:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I guess we can rephrase our own words but I can't work out how to restore the page.

July 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Learn Local, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 04:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC) Hi Sorry this is not promotional. This is factual. These are legitimate alts about Learn Local. I am confused. If you check the references you will see. Can you please help me by explaining? I honestly don't understand. You seem to have even removed material that was in the previous version for years.Reply