Hello Like.liberation! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Smee19:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Your recent [revert] on the Youth for Human Rights International deleted grammar, spelling and readability changes that were made by a previously uninvolved and neutral third party editor. Wholesale reverts can be destructive and can inadvertently remove spelling, grammar and readability changes made by other editors. Please use reverts sparingly as a sign of respect to other editors who have attempted to help improve the article. Thank you. Lsi john 13:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
I apologize, LSI john. I felt many of your edits omitted relevant information. Our difference of opinion over what is relevant, I think, was why I reverted. Like.liberation 07:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Where in the reference does it say this: "A French human rights commission submitted to the Assemblee nationale in December 2006 a report including testimony of abuses on Scientology's part that harmed the physical and mental health of children."? Makoshack10:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
That does not answer the question, does it? Could you at least name the "french human rights commission" and give me the page number of the "abuses"? Makoshack01:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
It does, if you would read the source. The name is on the first page: "AU NOM DE LA COMMISSION D’ENQUÊTE relative à l’influence des mouvements à caractère sectaire et aux conséquences de leurs pratiques sur la santé physique et mentale des mineurs." Can you read French? I will translate this bit for you. "In the name of the investigative commission regarding the influence of sects and the consequences of their practices on the physical and mental health of minors." The president of the commission is a member of the French parliament, the commission was official, and the report was submitted to the Assemblee nationale.
There is this exchange on page 26, between Jacques Remillier, a member of the commission, and Roger Gonnet, ex-head of the Scientology office in Lyon:
S’agissant des mineurs dont les parents appartiennent à la Scientologie, M. Roger Gonnet a indiqué que certains enfants peuvent être appelés au service de commandement central de la Scientologie (la Sea Org) dès l’âge de six ans : « Certains enfants peuvent être en poste dès l’âge de six ans. Ils font un très grand nombre d’heures, en transportant des papiers. À partir d’un certain âge, ils sont susceptibles d’être envoyés dans le goulag de la Scientologie, le RPF : Redemption Project Force. Il y en a à Hemet, à Los Angeles, à Clearwater en Floride ; il y en a un au Danemark, en Angleterre et vraisemblablement en Australie.
M. Jacques REMILLER : Qu’y fait-on ?
M. Roger GONNET : Cinq heures de bourrage de crâne quotidien, plus dix heures de travail. On court sans arrêt. On n’a pas le droit à la radio, à la télévision, aux journaux. Dans la plupart des cas, les gens ne peuvent plus voir leurs enfants, leur femme ou leur mari, etc. Ils ne peuvent pas sortir tant que ce n’est pas fini ; cela peut durer des années. »
Do you understand that? Gonnet testifies that some children are sent to serve at Sea Org at RPF sites from the age of six. He says they are subject to ten hours of work per day, plus five hours of brainwashing. He says they are not allowed access to newspapers, radio or television. Most important of all, he says that their parents are limited in if not denied all access to them. "They can't leave until they've finished; that can take years."
On page 35, Gonnet says that children are interrogated with Security checks especially designed for minors between the ages of six and 12. On pages 84-5, he describes the dangers of Narcanon for adolescents. The last Narcanon in France closed in 1984 after one of the patients died. This assertion was also reported in a French magazine, L'Expresse: Article du 3 août 2006 de Mme Solenne Durox « Sectes : d’une drogue à l’autre ». I hope that satisfies your curiosity. In any case, it backs up my statements on the YHRI page.Like.liberation10:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Like.liberation, I believe you have mis-read or mis-interpreted Krator's 3O.
His suggestion clearly allowed for multiple tags and stated that it was only an opinion, not mandatory wiki policy, that only one tag be used. He also clearly stated that, unless the editor was inactive, article tags should be removed by the editor who placed them, not another individual.
Your edit [here] was in direct contradiction to his recommendation.
In fact, Krator [reverted] Smee for doing exactly the same thing, only 4 edits before you.
You most likely read too quickly and did not grasp the entire 3O as it was presented. Please be more careful in the future lest your conduct be construed as rude and offensive.
After taking time to consider the tags, I would like to make a change from how the tags were. But if I do that before you revert yourself, it could be perceived as edit-warring and I wish to avoid that.
In good-faith, I respectfully request that you revert your own edit and replace the tags as they were.
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You have breached the three revert rule on Youth_for_Human_Rights_International. Only the absence of a warning and your relative inexperience as a user saved you from a block. Please do not engage in edit warring. There is no reason why you can't let article content ride while you discuss it on the talk page. Next time you will be blocked. SpartazHumbug!19:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
AfD nomination of Wasilla librarian letter of termination
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Civility Award
For your part in reaching the excellent consensus version of "the library controversy" I give you this Barnstar. The way we all came to consensus on this contentious event was truly Wikipedia at its best. ThaddeusB (talk) 01:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Airbrite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Y Combinator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Like.liberation. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is PR-driven and / or WP:SPI. The article is cited to online business directories, company's own web site, interviews and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Raised $3M in funding strongly suggesting that it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hi, I use Deeplearning4j and other open-source code as a software developer, but I'm not otherwise affiliated. I opened up a discussion the Skymind talk page about the proposed deletion to address your points. Like.liberation 20:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skymind until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Like.liberation. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airbrite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Like.liberation. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Like.liberation,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wolfsuka for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Gibson (computer scientist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Nicholson (entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeplearning4j until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
