March 2019

edit
 
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike | Talk 01:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Limiteddays (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have fully understood why I was blocked. However, what I have written on the page was just a self-introduction, there was no purpose of promoting my channel on youtube, furthermore, I am new to wikipedia. Therefore, I will erase the sentence about youtube.

Accept reason:

Unblocking on the understanding this was a good faith mistake. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

What are you going to edit about if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 07:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@331dot: Blocks are cheap. The user does not obviously look like they're promoting anything, so we should assume good faith and only block again if and when there is disruption. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
But so far they have not erased the sentence about YouTube! --Orange Mike | Talk 05:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Erased. --Limiteddays (talk) 00:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Razer Blade Stealth Series.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the Razer Blade Stealth Series.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply