Linkinpark890

August 2009

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:AnemoneProjectors may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 19:07, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edit to History of Spain (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edit to History of Spain (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 19:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Championships, Wimbledon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Championships, Wimbledon was changed by Linkinpark890 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-08-02T19:08:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:08, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to History of Spain. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jeff M | Talk2Me | BNosey - 19:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

its not vandalism Linkinpark890 (talk) 19:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Not only is it vandalism, but it's offensive vandalism. Jeff M | Talk2Me | BNosey - 19:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

why is it offensiveLinkinpark890 (talk) 19:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to History of Spain. Jeff M | Talk2Me | BNosey - 19:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 19:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Linkinpark890 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i do not see why these edits are offensive

Decline reason:

If you really cannot see why these edits are not appropriate then it is clear thet you will not be able to contribute productively to the encyclopedia. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.