User talk:Lithistman/Harkness system

Good enough

@Unitanode: Isn't that already good enough? Put it to the articles' section. -- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 06:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks, but I don't think so -- at least not yet. I'm wanting to expand it a bit, before placing it in article space. UnitAnode 07:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Maybe state also the mathematical correlation of that thing. And then also mention other systems....-- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 11:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Those are some good ideas. Why don't you see if you can find an online reference for some text to that effect, and place it in the article work-up? UnitAnode 11:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

I confess that topic is not my (favourite field). But I will see, when I have more time (and the will :D). But you must be patient. It can take some time. -- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

• Oh, please don't feel obligated. If chess isn't your thing, you should sign up for a WikiProject about some subject area that is more to your liking. There are WikiProjects on all manner of subjects. UnitAnode 12:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

I really encourage you, to put that as a regular article. I saw much worse drafts already, yours is good enough. -- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 11:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

• I'm busy in real life today, but I may work on it some tonight, and then place it in the mainspace. UnitAnode 14:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)