See User talk:LittleDan/Archive for archives.

Thanks

edit

Nice contribution to WikiSummaries! The site could use more editors like you. Best, Geneffects 13:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Iain Lee

edit

This page was deleted, and has recently been re-started. could you possibly explain to me why it was deleted, and why it had to be restarted, resulting in a huge loss of information on this person --Wser 16:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Long talk page

edit

Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit long in the tooth - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers! BD2412 T 00:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bobert.mik

edit

He has not done anything since the test4 final warning, but it's shaping up to be a vandalism only account. Your call - some of the vandalism is pretty offesnive. Kuru talk 16:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WP:NOVEL

edit

I saw what job you intended to do... adding infoboxes to novels without them. Please have a look at this list... it is an automated list of articles with out an infobox. It goes category by category. I am the person that makes that list, and I am always in need of new categories to search. So post ideas for categories on the talk page if you are interested!!

Thanks for joining WP:NOVEL!!!

 

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often refered to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Don't forget the {{User WikiProject Novels}} userbox on your userpage. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

No. of edits

edit

To get your number of edits, go to User:Interiot/Tool2 and follow the instructions. Grey Shadow 07:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

exactly - but do bear in mind that the "toolserver" that hosts this functionaity periodically suffers from being out of date. The latest update is about a month ago so you "may" find your count is too low. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lead paragraph

edit

This is really a question about the article lead paragraph. the guidance about this across "all" articles is that it is meant to be a cut down version of the whole article. Or the basic information anyone should known about the subject of the article. So I personally believe year of publication is one thing to be in that paragraph. However I do NOT think that ISBN should be part of that information, which veers towards the advertising that wikipedia is not supposed to be. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

oops --- I fogot to sign

edit

Ok, sorry about not signing. Eagle talk 22:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Novel searches

edit

I noticed your post on Eagle's talk page saying that you used Amazon for novel searches, I just wanted to let you know that [www.alibris.com] is also very useful, as you can specify first editions in your search, and the library of congress website at [www.loc.gov] has every edition of every book published in America, and lists all the info, unlike alibris most of the time. Just look for the earliest date. -- Gizzakk 01:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Yes, most of the time you should use the first edition cover/ISBN/page count in the infobox, and note it as such. Any other editions can be listed under a "release details" subheading, and alternate covers (later editions, different languages, etc) can be arranged throughout the article, but for a short article just the first edition cover is probably sufficient. If, however, you cannot find the first edition info, or the info you do find does not specifically state that it is first edition, make sure to note that the info you use is from X edition, or an unknown edition. Also, be aware that not all first editions are "true" first editions- if a book is released in different countries and/or by a different publisher, it will most likely be stated as a first edition, even though it is not. If you are unsure, look for "first printing" and/or the earliest date you can find. -- Gizzakk 22:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

DYK

edit

I noticed you did an update. However you missed several critical steps of the procedure. Also you didn't select some good articles that would be uneligible the next day and as such will never see the light of the day (so to speak). Next time please do the updating properly, like described at Template talk:Did you know.  Grue  17:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yep, it's easy to do something wrong given how complex the procedure is. In addition to editing the template you also needed to update its talk page, archiving the old content, removing selected items and updating time. You are welcome to try to do it next time. Oh, and by the way...
  On 21 July, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Fortescue, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- Grue  17:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

RE: Johnny Lee Clary - Please help

edit

Hey there, my name is Nick, my username is Potters house and I have encountered a problem with trying to provide any information about Johnny Lee Clary. I have posted this post off to other staff members also. I am not sure if this is the best route to resolve this, but can think of no other way.

The article Johnny Lee Clary has been deleted. I have known Johnny through telephone conversations and email for a short time now (about 3-4 months). He recently came and shared his life story in for our church group for the first time just two weeks ago. Before I met Johnny I became interested in his story i.e. his conversion from the head of the KKK in the US, to being a Christian Minister who now teaches against race hate groups. I found the article Johnny Lee Clary as it still is today, deleted, except for some small talk. If you read the talk you see what I have said at the time (notice I have gotten no reply, probable my fault as I don’t know heaps about WIKI policy). From my understanding Johnny Lee Clary was posting as The KingOfDixie and looks like he tried to change a few things on Wiki concerning the KKK. While this is a controversial subject, Johnny being the former leader of the KKK would probably know a thing or two and be able to contibute, but that’s another story. He eventually made an article about himself i.e. Johnny Lee Clary. Johnny being quite new to Wiki and ignorant of rules of conduct found himself at odds with some admins and had his site deleted.

Whilst observing Johnny over the last 3-4 months I have noticed that he is very outspoken against race hate groups such as the Neo Nazis, Skinheads, KKK etc. This, more often than not, lands Johnny in the hot seat. He has experienced persecution from racist groups for his departure from the KKK and voiced opinions against these racist organizations on his webpage, www.xkkk.org. Johnny has also received multiple death threats.

Because of his bold stance against these racist groups Johnny has become accustomed to hatred directed at him by those same groups. Johnny concluded that perhaps the guy who deleted the page Johnny Lee Clary was a white supremist. I am hoping to clear this up. Before he told me this, I started to create J L Clary, after hearing nothing from posting in user talk on Johnny Lee Clary's article. I wasn't 10 minutes into the J L Clary article when it was issued a deletion notice, and then before I had time to reply (about 5 minutes) it was deleted! I was amazed. I told this to Johnny and he said the main reason he was told that he couldn't have an article was because he was not prominent enough.

Johnny has a very famous testimony and has been on multiple TV shows like Oprah, Donahue, Jerry Springer, etc, and even recently when he preached in our town he made front page news, a double spread on his life, and the local ABC interviewed him live, which is not bad for our town (LISMORE NSW Australia) See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Kerry&dir=prev&offset=20050327125109&limit=500&action=history .

When David Wilkerson came to our town hardly anyone knew or cared, yet David Wilkerson is allowed an article (and rightfully so), but more people know of Johnny. As to whether he is famous or not, just Google search him and see all the TV interviews and radio interviews he does. He hangs with some of the most prominent Christian leaders in Australia. Besides this, just being the former KKK leader should be enough for an article (he doesn't even get a mention in the KKK one, and would be deleted). He was also a Pro Wrestler. So he is prominent in Christian circles, he is prominent amongst race hate groups, and he is also prominent in the WWE wrestling.

Johnny asked me to test the waters for him to see if he was being persecuted by someone from a race hate group. So I created some sites, John Clary Wade Watts and Operation Colorblind - the name of Johnny's Ministry. These have been fine until yesterday. I cannot understand why these sites are just issued a deletion notice? Just because they mention JLC? I was hoping to discuss these things but they are just deleted. The one on Wade Watts is about a black gospel preacher who was one of the leaders in the civil rights movement in the US and was good friends with Martin Luther King. He took Johnny Clary under his wing and even ordained Johnny as a minister (to this day Johnny is the only white man ordained in the All Black Baptist Church). But his article is up for deletion because I mentioned Clary and had a link.

That is why I am writing to you to see if you can help. It seems to me that the person(s) deleting all articles which even mention Johnny Lee Clary has an agenda. I thought that wikipedia admins had to keep a neutral stance on every article. It seems like this guy has a vendetta against JLC. Why delete the Wade Watts article. That is guilt by association and could be proof that all deletions are because of racial discrimination! I hope this is not the case and would think that it is politically motivated, as Johnny is a strong supporter of George Bush and Antaeus Feldspar of Kerry.

See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Kerry&dir=prev&offset=20050327125109&limit=500&action=history This shows how Antaeus Feldspar supports Kerry, which is fine, but Johnny is a strong supporter of Bush.

My hope is that Johnny will be able to have an article like any other famous person, minister, former KKK leader, or pro wrestler, and that Johnny and anyone connected with him and his ministry will in future have certain rules set in place that do not allow the wholesale deletion of the articles associated with him, but that they will be at least discussed.

I thank you for reading this long winded post. I have only been using WIKI for about a year myself so I need your help, I don't really know what else to do. I hope you can help. I personally think that Johnny's story is one that is beneficial to the cause of reconciliation between races and to the3 unity of society as a whole. It would be a shame if WIKI became known for having covert racists. Of course I hope that this is a misunderstanding and that all will be cleared up soon.

Here are some links that might help.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wade_Watts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheKingOfDixie

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Colorblind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Threeafterthree

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Potters_house

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Antaeus_Feldspar

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Kerry&dir=prev&offset=20050327125109&limit=500&action=history This shows how Antaeus Feldspar supports Kerry, which is fine, but Johnny is a strong supporter of Bush. Perhaps the bias is political and not racial?

The link for page: John Clary has already been deleted!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alabamaboy

Please notice that his link was taken from the KKK site the same day:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=prev&oldid=65690238

then

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=65690238

Also note his contributions: Featured articles: · African American literature -- My first featured article. Thanks to everyone who gave feedback. While I didn't start the article, I obsessed on it for an entire month and wrote most of the copy. · Ku Klux Klan -- I began work on this article after it became a featured article. Since then I've mediated several editorial disputes on the article (including one of which kept the article from being delisted as a FA) and made a large number of edit. Potters house 00:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Nick.Reply

Thanks for the advice dan Potters house 04:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Nick.Reply

Novels WikiProject Newsletter August 2006

edit

Here is the new edition of our monthly newsletter. The August 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

  On 12 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Human rights in Kuwait, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.
  On 16 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Human rights in Jordan, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Welcome!

edit
Welcome!
File:World map.gif

Hi, and welcome to the Countries WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of counties.


There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Starting some new articles? See some model pages such as Cambodia!
  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every country article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Shy1520 10:26, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox SSR

edit

Hi. I'm not very good with templates but could you make the "chairman" and "population" fields optional and create another optional field for "chairmen" (plural)? This would be necessary for cases such as the Transcaucasian SFSR. Thanks in advance! -- Clevelander 22:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem. -- Clevelander 23:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Great work. I'll apply the template to the Lithuanian SSR, Moldavian SSR, Tajik SSR, Turkmen SSR, Ukrainian SSR, and Uzbek SSR templates. BTW, the Karelo-Finnish SSR was established on March 31, 1940. -- Clevelander 19:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

David Card

edit

Thank you for your concern on David Card. I acually am planning on making a article on him. I started that page because I made a page for Combined Transport Inc.. And since no one has a article I was starting to make one. I can understand you maybe getting a little annoyed at this. But I was just gathering information about everyone first then making it. Now that you have voiced your concern I for now will make a basic stub, then finish it later. But yep, I shall be making a lot of articles in the time to come. If you need me again just put it on my chat page. Thanks! --Steven91 06:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV (September 2006)

edit

The September 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 12:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Montenegrin parliamentary election, 2006

edit

Well, I took an official source, one approved by the Government of Montenegro: Center for Democratic Transition, whose only purpose of existence is to moniter Elections and referenda. Anything else you need, jsut come and drop a line! Cheers! --HolyRomanEmperor 20:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Np. :) Anything else you would ever need - don't hesitate to drop by and ask. Cheers, mate! --HolyRomanEmperor 18:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Succession Table

edit

What's wrong with the table? It looks good to me. I am not sure what the problem was with the <td>, though. It has never had any glitches for me since I last tried to add new features to it.
Whaleyland ( TalkContributions )

Okay, so I remembered something that got erased when some rules were removed for beautification purposes. You don't have to put in <td>, you just have to put in a |- after the s-ttl. It was something I couldn't ever fix because I couldn't put an end-line css in s-ttl because it is usually followed by something like s-aft. Just insert a |- and it works. Sorry about the confusion.
Whaleyland ( TalkContributions )

Infobox economy

edit

I don't really have a problem with it. I am all for anything that will improve Wikipedia. I just hope you don't change the dollar bill image, but if you do, such is life. Take care! OBILI ® ± 17:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for contributions to Constitution of Thailand

edit

Thanks you for your contributions to Constitution of Thailand. Patiwat 09:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006

edit

The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC) Reply

Economy templates

edit

I think the switch to the German style template is good. Be sure to include the image option! OBILI ® ± 15:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure if there is any guidelines for this, but if you want to delete each template you upgrade, and cite this TfD, the precedent would be enough. If you are really concerned, maybe a thread at the admin noticeboard? RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 20:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maps of Syria

edit

Hello. I see you created a few nice maps of Syrian governorates (like Image:Ar-Raqqah-map.png) a few months ago. Still most of Syrian governorates articles aren't created. Could you do more of these maps, please? I will then create subsequent articles. Thank you. - Darwinek 09:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oh, let me apologize, I didn't realized they are in the cities articles. So it is OK now. I can now create all needed articles. Thank you for creating that maps. - Darwinek 16:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
 
Thank you!

I can't really express enough thanks for the barnstar. It made my day :) . At the very least, you should have this cookie. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 23:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re:template

edit

Thanx for reminding me :-) I want to apply the template for every Regencies of Indonesia. But I should make a research first, for about 1-2 month(s). If you delete it, it's OK. I'll make it again later. wic2020talk bicara 15:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

hello

edit

I saw that you've listed "Iran's Islamic foreign policy" for deletion, I just wanted to tell you that "Patchouli" the user who created that article has also created many other similar political articles that are extremely biased and look like original work, here is another example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_Iran-Iraq_War

Can you please list that article for deletion too, I don't know how to.

Infoboxes

edit

Sure, go ahead. However, it would be nice if you included more fields to your template (ideally all of those that are already there in "my version"). Now that the wiki can handle conditional clauses in tables and templates this shouldn't be a problem for anyone and I'm an inclusionist, so the more fields are there, the better. Also, a thing I was thinking of adding myself was, in addition to the footnote field, some way to indicate whether a voivodeship is historical or modern. A place for timespan would be more than enough, ideally somewhere near the top. Alternatively we could include two colour schemes, but this wouldn't be as evident I guess. //Halibutt 20:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sure, logo is not a crucial thing, same as GDP or unemployment rate (actually nobody in Poland knows for sure what the level of unemployment is). On the other hand more fields for levels of administrative division could be nice, especially that people here in Poland differ very strongly when it comes to local patriotism. Most of us feel Poles and citizens of a particular town and voivodeship, but in some cases the feelings for the town are replaced by the feelings towards a commune or a powiat. Another useful inclusion IMO would be an additional field for percentage of the population of the entire country living in the particular voivodeship. And of course a place for the external link would also be a nice idea. //Halibutt 04:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Request for Comment

edit

Hello there! I'm Scalene, and I am the third party for the conflict between Fan-1967 (talk) and Patchouli (talk), about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opposition to Iran-Iraq War. I noticed that you nominated the article for deletion. Also, you have raised some unique points. I believe these points could help reach a resolution. Because of these two reasons, I ask if you would not mind taking the time to join the conflict resolution. ScaleneUserPageTalkContributionsBiography 11:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

POV pushing

edit

Thanks for your reply, I really think that an administrator's intervention is needed here, User:Patchouli doesn't seem to understand that articles must be created or written from a neutral point of view or that this is an encyclopedia and NOT a political fourm. To see what I mean, just look at some of the articles he's created or has been working on:

Mohammad Khatami's reforms (POV fork to bash a living person, just look at the introduction and how biased it's worded)

Mohammad Khatami ( Please see the evidence of some of Patchouli's abuses at Talk:Mohammad_Khatami#Patchouli_edits, it includes links and refernces to his personal attacks on other users' talk pages calling them agents of foreign governments etc)

Guardianship of the Islamic Jurists (adding Mullahcracy which is political epithet, jargon and neologism, as an alternative to the title of the article by citing political editorials! Also see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mullahcracy)

Association for Defense of Azerbaijani Political Prisoners (POV fork)

Khomeini's Islamic leadership (POV fork)

Government-organized demonstration (POV fork)


P.s Please look at this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iran%27s_Islamic_foreign_policy&action=history The AfD that you had submitted was closed, the result was to redirect the page, but Patchouli still keeps reverting the page and removing the re-direct against the AfD consusneus. This is just yet another example of this user's POV-pushing and disruption.

--Patrick987 06:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I highly encourage Patrick987 to go to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 October 27 for his last item.

My own contributions range from mathematics to science to history to sexuality to... You might want to carefully examine my contributions and not throw half a dozen articles at me with ambiguity.

A thorough reading of Talk:Mohammad Khatami will show that I am the most unbiased editor. I strongly exhort thee to do so as an administrator. That alone will vindicate me and I shall not proceed further. I stand by all my comments on that page.--Patchouli 18
09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I think User:Patrick987 has explained things very clearyly. My native language is not English and I have a little bit of difficulty expressing my thoughts, so it made me feel really good to read Patrick987's comment because it exactly covered all of the things that I wanted to say (specially the part about Mullacracy which I didn't know how to explain in English that it's not a formal/polite word). Anyway I have already written about Patchouli's numerous violations of wikipedia rules in Mohammad Khatami, which you can read in this talk section, there I have pointed out one by one cases of npov-violation and what I would like to call his "sneaky" vandalism, his misleading use of references, etc. etc. It seems that this user either lacks common sense (and therefore does not understand the concept of NPOV) or he is deliberately trying to sabotage wikipedia. In either case he must be stopped as soon as possible. Barnetj 19:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

LittleDan, would you please inform us if you are taking any action in regards to the situation with User:Patchouli or not? It seems that you are not pursuing the matter. He's continuing his sabotage of different articles and it seems that nobody has the will or power to stop him! see his new edits on Mohammad Khatami's reforms Barnetj 15:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi LittleDan. I'm planning of taking action against User:Patchouli by filing a complaint in ArbCom because I do not think there's a reasonable chance of making him comply with wikipedia regulations by any other means. I want to list you as one of the involved parties and I'd like to know if you are willing to provide a statement in ArbCom, explaining your encounter with Patchouli. I will appreciate if you let me know as soon as possible. thank you Barnetj 14:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Response

edit

After responding to queries, I clean my talk page to avoid the temptation of looking back and wasting my time as you are needlessly forcing me to do. I hereby deny your numerous allegations specifically and categorically. I spend gargantuan efforts towards sourced and high-quality contributions. None of "POV forks" as thou allegeth. Your own support for the outright deletion of Opposition to Iran-Iraq War is highly questionable and that issue has not been resolved.

I suggest that you squander neither my time nor yours with baseless allegations.----Patchouli 17:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply


The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VI - November 2006

edit

The November 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dolphins logo.gif)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Dolphins logo.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 17:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

edit

The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

edit

The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Reply

Regarding images you previously uploaded at Wikibooks

edit

Dan, currently we at Wikibooks are deleted untagged images, as we found out that we have 3,000+. I came across your six images and was wondering if you would be willing to tag them as GFDL, CC (whatever version), or PD. I think the screenshots of Mozilla Firebird are automatically GFDL even if you would that they be something different. I am not sure, however, as I do not know for sure whether Firebird was licensed under GFDL or not. These are a list of the images:

I would really like to contact you about this, so if you do not answer here in a while, I will try to e-mail you using Special:Emailuser. Thank you, Iamunknown 10:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Hq9-plus.py listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hq9-plus.py, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Superm401 - Talk 18:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC). Superm401 - Talk 18:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007

edit

The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

User Patchouli

edit

A report has been filed against user Patchouli for his POV pushing. Please contribute at [1]

I added one of your comments in his talk page there.--Sa.vakilian 18:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I gathered some proofs against him [2] and I wanted User:Bishonen to help me. This is his advice. [3] Now please come and write a strong claim against him in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Community ban against Patchouli or any thing else which you prefer. I prefer you do so not me because you are an admin and also you're not Iranian. Thus nobody can blame you that you want to censor different POV. Thanks a lot.--Sa.vakilian 14:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
My 2 cents. I don't know this user personally, but I hoped that we could salvage this one. Admittedly, I can't make him do anything or control his behaviour. Knowing that he'll likely try to return, I only hope that if does try to come back sometime down the road he will have learned his lesson. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 22:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
List any bad edits and I'll revert them (using undo). As for him trying to return, did you block his IP? BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 03:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - March 2007

edit

The March 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - April 2007

edit

The April 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by Grafikbot 11:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - May 2007

edit

The May 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Governorates of Syria

edit

Hi Dan. I replaced all your maps of the governorates of Syria with others I made. Yours had an error: between Homs, Deir ez-Zor, and Hama. Regards, Anas talk? 15:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIII - June 2007

edit

The June 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 14:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox Chinese emperor

edit

Hi, I noticed that Template:Infobox Chinese emperor contains some extra space at the top of the page whenever it is used. Do you know how to fix this? Thanks. Shawnc 00:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Redirect of Scenar

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Scenar, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Scenar is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Scenar, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Scenar itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV - July 2007

edit

The July 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 17:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XV - August 2007

edit

The August 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.


This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox Economy

edit

Do you think it would be a good idea change the subheading "Trading partners" to "Trade" in this infobox ? Abecedare 00:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you are active only intermittently on wikipedia, so I went ahead and made the change. If you disagree, please drop me a line on my talk page. Cheers. Abecedare 00:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Alphapharm.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Alphapharm.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI - September 2007

edit

The September 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 09:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Cotton-gin.jpg

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Cotton-gin.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 00:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVII - October 2007

edit

The October 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 09:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVIII - November 2007

edit

The November 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 15:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007

edit

The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 11:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008

edit

The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 13:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXI - February 2008

edit

The February 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --11:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008

edit

The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --17:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election

edit

An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 13:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIII - April 2008

edit

The April 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008

edit

The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 08:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008

edit

The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 02:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence

edit

Hello. I'm contacting you and other members of WikiProject Books in order to find if you are interested in collaborating to expand and improve The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence article to make it worthy of becoming a featured article candidate, in light of the fact that it is the first book the U.S. government ever went to court to censor before its publication. --Loremaster (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Image:OldEnglish.png

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Image:OldEnglish.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:OldEnglish.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 (talk) 07:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Years

edit

This WikiProject is having a revival and is trying to determine the direction it will be heading in the future. Questions are being asked, and exciting things are coming in the future, including the bringing of 1345 and other year articles to GA and even FA status. You are listed as a member and are invited to respond to this roll-call by putting an asterisk next to your username on the members list to show that you are still active in the project. Thanks. Wrad (talk) 20:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Calling all active WP:NOVELS members

edit
WikiProject Novels Roll Call
 

WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!

Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María (habla conmigo) 18:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008

edit

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Reply


Economy Box Thing

edit

Someone has vandalized it, can you fix it? Thanks, Harold 74.194.165.68 (talk) 00:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Western front cover.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Western front cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Years

edit

In 2009, WikiProject Years developed a essay for the inclusion of events "recent year" articles.

Important policy discussions took place in January 2009 at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) and at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years.

Deilvered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC) on request of WradReply

File:Christian-lineage.JPG missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Christian-lineage.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:29, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Mozdev.org

edit

I have nominated Mozdev.org, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mozdev.org. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 23:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Hungarian county

edit

 Template:Infobox Hungarian county has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM01:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Slogan 'War on terror'

edit

I have nominated Slogan 'War on terror' (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. JokerXtreme (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Christian-lineage.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christian-lineage.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 01:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Pluto and charon.gif

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Pluto and charon.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 03:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Difstrokes cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Difstrokes cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:54, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Svyatoslav Pestov

edit
 

The article Svyatoslav Pestov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No outside reliable and verifiable sources given to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yaksar (let's chat) 20:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Svyatoslav Pestov for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Svyatoslav Pestov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svyatoslav Pestov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yaksar (let's chat) 21:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of SourceWatch

edit
 

The article SourceWatch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Was mentioned in one news article for a very minor event during the 2008 election.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LiteralKa (talk) 01:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Optical Society

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Optical Society, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crusio (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

edit

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

edit

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

edit

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

edit

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

 
Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

edit

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:SACU

edit

 Template:SACU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 12:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:Aleppo-map.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:SACU-small.PNG

edit
 

The file File:SACU-small.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Internet Police for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Internet Police is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Police until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Apocheir (talk) 02:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Liberty Playing Card Company for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liberty Playing Card Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberty Playing Card Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BoraVoro (talk) 12:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply