Archive 5Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 15

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcos Di-Bernardo (February 17)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 16:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pseudonascus paulliniae has been accepted

 
Pseudonascus paulliniae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Verbin Sutherland has been accepted

 
Verbin Sutherland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adekunle Rilwan Fasasi (February 18)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 19:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenlyn Gonsalves has been accepted

 
Kenlyn Gonsalves, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Christian Wetlesen Prebensen (February 19)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RS-808 (February 19)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veaceslav Banari (February 19)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adekunle Rilwan Fasasi (February 20)

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Sulfurboy (talk) 03:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1537 in philosophy (February 21)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veaceslav Banari (February 21)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Eleuterio Ramírez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Osorno and Tarapacá
Amina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Karama
Arduinna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Diana
Blue Mustang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Luis Jiménez
Elijah Lagat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nandi
Eugenio S. Belaval (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to New Progressive Party
Evelyn Sibley Lampman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dallas High School
Ferdinand Claiborne Latrobe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to James Hodges
Fernando Castro Lozada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Santa Fe

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veaceslav Banari (February 24)

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Adding just a listing does not count as significant coverage - transfermarkt is not a reliable source.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert N. Hartzell has been accepted

 
Robert N. Hartzell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nordforsk (February 29)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 10:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talavera thorelli has been accepted

 
Talavera thorelli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Talavera thorelli

Hello, Liverpoolpics,

Thank you for creating Talavera thorelli.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

/

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sulfurboy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nordforsk (March 1)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CaptainEek were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 06:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juwelo (March 3)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 05:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Villi Sørensen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Villi Sørensen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Un peuple et son roi has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Un peuple et son roi. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 01:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kjell Markset (March 8)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 07:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jules-Isidore Lafrance has been accepted

 
Jules-Isidore Lafrance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ā̀

 

Hello, Liverpoolpics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ā̀".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tone Brændvik (March 11)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by J947 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— J947 (user | cont | ess), at 04:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1982 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1982 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kjell Markset (March 13)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Engström (March 13)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Geologic

Hi, thank you for adding an infobox to Aquia Formation, see for how to fill it for instance Escucha Formation, but the correct one is Template:Infobox rockunit, please feel free to add and fill that one, thanks and happy editing. Tisquesusa (talk) 16:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juwelo (March 14)

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is essentially an advertisement
DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Engström (March 14)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kjell Markset has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kjell Markset. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alabama Public Service Commission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Commission
American Folklife Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Center

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Engström (March 15)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)