Lizzythetech

Hey all! This is my talk page. I'm very new to contributing to Wikipedia, although I've been a reader for years. I'm interested in learning pretty much anything new, and some of my favorite subjects are philosophy, poetry, literature, and new inventions.

Welcome Lizzythetech!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 39,929,315 registered editors!

Hello Lizzythetech. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost   Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Sm8900 (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

• Español
• Deutsch
• Français
• Italiano
• עברית
• Русский
• 日本語
• Polski
• فارسی

Sm8900 (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Lizzythetech! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Writing an article about Dax (self-driving robot), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daxbot (Robot) (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daxbot (Robot) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daxbot (Robot), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Lizzythetech! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Daxbot (Robot) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daxbot (Robot). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! I'd really appreciate any further insight you could give me into fixing this article and what needs to be improved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daxbot (Robot) has been accepted

Daxbot (Robot), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Future of Daxbot (Robot) and other articles, if any

Thanks for you significant improvements to Daxbot (Robot) in light of review suggestions. I wish more new editors responded as well.

If you have further changes to make to Daxbot (Robot), please do not make them directly. Instead place your suggested change on Talk:Daxbot (Robot) along with the {{Request edit}} template (follow the link for usage instructions). The exception is reverting obvious vandalism, you may do that directly. This is because of your status as a paid editor.

While you may now create articles directly without going through a draft, I advise you not to do so. I further strongly advise that in the case of any articles where you have a paid status, or a strong WP:COI, you use draft and AfC. This avoids problems and possible deletion. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I would like to create other articles in the future (they probably wont be articles with a conflict of interest, though). I really appreciate the time that everyone has taken to show me the ropes. Lizzythetech (talk) 16:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Daxbot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daxbot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daxbot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Lizzythetech! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Moving Articles from Draft to Mainspace, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Daxbot, you may be blocked from editing. You disclosed that you work for the company that makes this robot. You have done little else on Wikipedia but to promote it. If you continue doing so, you will likely be blocked from contributing further. Sandstein 14:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

I wrote one article that I was very transparent about, asked for help keeping within the guidelines. I didn't even end up publishing it because someone else published it for me. When someone voted to take it down I gave my reasons for disagreeing with them, and then stepped back and let the Wiki community decide, after which I did nothing to promote the article that had been deleted or refute the decision. I have acted reasonably and above board in every instance, and if you consider writing one article on something I know about undue promotion, I think your problem is with something else and not with me. Lizzythetech (talk) 22:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)