February 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Little Door Gods has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wood flooring has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wood flooring was changed by Llcoolj89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856914 on 2016-07-29T16:48:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have manually reverted the bot edit of your reference addition, ie restored, assuming seems to be a good faith edit - false positive - commercial but not promotional - and is appropriately placed reference in context. Aoziwe (talk) 11:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit

  Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  06:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at iPhone 7 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ViperSnake151  Talk  07:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Llcoolj89 reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: ). Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  07:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Learn how to edit Wikipedia!

edit
The
Adventure
 

Hi Llcoolj89!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!


This message was delivered by -- samtar talk or stalk 07:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Reply

Edit warring at iPhone 7

edit

You've been warned for edit warring per the result of this report. If you continue to revert without getting any support from others you may be blocked. You should wait until you get others to agree with you on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  BethNaught (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply