Loeckenhoff

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Loeckenhoff. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Corinna Löckenhoff, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Loeckenhoff, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username. If you choose to do so, we ask the following:

1. Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
2. Please send an email to info-enwikimedia.org. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles email is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Newslinger talk 04:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

@Newslinger: - hi there, I've confirmed their identity through OTRS and are discussing COIs and such - any objections to unblocking? Nosebagbear (talk) 16:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for confirming, Loeckenhoff and Nosebagbear! I have no objections at all. — Newslinger talk 21:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Cool - I've unblocked Nosebagbear (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you. [Loeckenhoff]

What would prefer happen with the article about you?

Am I correct in understanding that you would prefer to have the article about you deleted? With a stub with an ORCID ID as a secondary preference, and a longer article as a tertiary preference? I'm embarassed about the bureaucracy Wikipedia is making you wade through here. Plantdrew (talk) 03:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

fwiw, Wikipedia policy in this area is set out at WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. I have started Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corinna Löckenhoff with a view to the deletion discussion being expedited as quickly as possible. hth --Tagishsimon (talk) 03:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

@Plantdrew: @Tagishsimon: yes, my preference was deletion, but I leave it up to your wikipedia expertise whether a stub might better since a stub would hopefully discourage creation of another more elaborate post with more incorrect information in the future? This has been an interesting experience, I've been using (and donating to) Wikipedia for years, and I've always taken the info with a healthy grain of skepticism, but it's been interesting to learn how the "talk" pages work and I'll be consulting them more frequently in the future. Thanks!!!

Loeckenhoff (talk) 05:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Yes, feel free to come again. We probably will keep the article as is, based on the notability criteria that we have here. We never ask academics or any subjects for that matter for their permission. Let's say, that with this, we are lazy. :) If you feel discouraged, I would advise you not to donate any more money to us, as it might be a waste of your time and resources, but that will be my POV, so don't take it literally. :)--Biografer (talk) 21:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

@Biografer: Actually, I'm fine how this worked out. With the added tweaks, the article looks great and by learning to work within the system I got a better appreciation of what goes on behind the scenes of an article. It's like with Churchill's quote about democracy being "the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have been tried". Wikipedia is the worst way of creating an encyclopedia except for all those other ways that have been tried.

Loeckenhoff (talk) 03:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm glad your satisfied with the outcome. You really got the grand tour of Wikipedia bureaucracy; I hope the educational value of your experience made up for some of the hassle. 03:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)