Hi Lomerell. You marked the Edgar Casey article with the NPOV tag but I didn't see a comment as to why in the discussion section for the article. If you get a chance, let us know what you thought was NPOV so we can look at how it might be corrected. (RookZERO 14:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC))
- My comment was at the bottom, actually a reply to someone who claimed a particular section was NPOV in the opposite direction: not skeptical enough. You'll find it at the bottom of the discussion page.
Actually, the majority of this whole article reads like it was written by complete skeptics who wouldn't believe a thing Cayce said or did even if it happened right before them. It most certainly is NOT a neutral POV, but for the opposite reason. Compare this massive array of "claims" and "purported" abilities. Please note that the article on Jesus Christ does not contain the word "Claimed" except in the context of what Islam claims about Christianity, and others historic figures who claimed to be Jesus Christ. The word "purported" in the article about Jesus Christ is applied only to relics of Christ, not Christs' teachings, powers, authority, theology, philosophy, prophesy, or otherwise. Wikipedia is not a place to publish your personal views of what Cayce, or anyone, said or did, but represent the facts and widely understood beliefs in a neutral fashion.
- (Lomerell)
- Ah, I see it now. I added a comment there. (RookZERO 02:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC))