LordComputerHero

Welcome!

Feel free to leave questions or anything on here as long as you leave the four tides.

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia Talk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acroterion (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

The page was deleted because it's a talk page placed inappropriately in article space, which is reserved for encyclopedia articles, not for talk or forum discussion. No part of Wikipedia is suitable for random conversation in any case: there are much better places on other websites for such discussions, or as Bonwarrior has already pointed out, this talkpage. . Acroterion (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your block

In reply to your question on my talk page, this is a list of your edits before you were blocked:

1. [1] Vandalism. Revereted by User:Mufka
2. [2] Vandalism. Reverted by User:Jared Preston
3. [3] Vandalism. Reverted by User:Jared Preston
4. [4] Vandalism (blanked the page and replaced with "Lewis Grover was born in 2000" restored automatically by ClueBot 23 October.
5. [5] 23 October Vandalism. reverted by User:Favonian (admin)

By this time I had seen enough and I blocked on 23 October for persistent vandalism but for one week only. In fact your account should have been blocked indefinitely as a vandalism-only account - think yourself lucky.

1. one week after block lifted. Not vandalism.
2. nonsense edit to a dab page 6 December. Reverted by User:Favonian (admin)
3. 6 December accuses User:Bongowarrior (admin)

How can you claim that you did not make these edits?
I'm leaving an official single warning below that will be registered. If you make one more nonsense edit you will be blocked indefinitely along with all the other computers where you have been editing from under your name, or editing without logging in. I hope you will understand. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

March 2012

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Mufka may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 21:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Rossami (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Documenting a Wikimail thread

Received by Wikimail to User:Rossami on Tuesday, April 3, 2012 3:10 PM

Hello,

I was shocked to find a two week block on my account after my holiday. Why do I have a block? Could you remove it?

<real name redacted>

Replied by wikimail from User:Rossami at 19:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Are you alleging that you did not make the following two edits?

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crap&diff=prev&oldid=485357505
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mufka&diff=prev&oldid=484440177

Given the history documented on your Talk page, please be specific about why should we consider your claim credible.

Yes, I am. LordComputerHero (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LordComputerHero (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why do I keep getting these blocks and bans. I haven't done anything. I am currently learning how to create Wikipedia pages and I am currently sandboxing a page. Please unblock me, it wasn't me. I promise. LordComputerHero (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The attempted blackmail noted below - which is directly linked to your account and cannot be faked - is grounds for indefinite blocking from Wikipedia. Stating you did not do it when the proof is right in front of you shows that we cannot even trust you to be honest. This is a community, and your actions have violated that nature (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you claim that you didn't commit this act of harassment against another editor? Or this one? Favonian (talk) 17:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I am. I really didn't do it.

LordComputerHero (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Then your account must be compromised...

Is there any edit you have made to this point that you think has improved the site? --Onorem♠Dil 18:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

I have never used Wikipedia for editing apart from the "Welcome!" part of my page.

Click here to see all of YOUR contributions. Oh, and at the top of the page, you claim that "mods are removing your work", which is an admission that you have indeed edited elsewhere. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

I didn't put that there either. I will remove it.

The proof shows that either you - or someone you gave access to this account - did put it there. The electronic links are permanent, you cannot hide things that you do on Wikipedia. If you're saying it was not you personally, then we will definitely need to permanently lock this account, including locking access to this talkpage. We expect honesty around here. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Possible sockpuppetry

I have mentioned both your account and two IPs you've used, 87.115.38.227 (talk) and 87.113.220.212 (talk). For evidence why you were reported, please go here. If you think this report is unjustified, please contact me. StormContent 23:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)