Welcome!

edit

Hello, LosRiel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 05:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Riel (band), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Also, please only use the "minor edit" button for truly minor edits. Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 07:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

Hi VQuakr! Sorry I did erase the message, I'm new here on wikipedia and did'nt knew exactly how to work it out. This page is for a real cult argentinian band that has a lot of appreciation around the world, it is a very special and unique band. You can verify it through the links and reviews on the article. They are on two big independent labels, one in Argentina and the other in the UK, and released also a single with a big american label. They are very active and known and still growing a lot. With time I could add some more reviews, references and missing data. I'm a big Riel fan, that's the reason of my username and the creation of this article. You told me about entering the article in the music categories. How should I do that? And by the way, the minor edits, were actually real minor edits, sorry if I did many of them. Hope everything's fine with this. Anything else please tell me or if you can help me work this out I will appreciate it. Thank you very much.

  Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Riel (band), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Sam Sailor Sing 10:33, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, but I removed that because I gave an explanation for that.
What should I do to stop this deleting advertise?
LosRiel (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
You should add inline citations to independent, reliable sources showing the band meets notability criteria for musicians and ensembles. Best, Sam Sailor Sing 00:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done! Thanks! LosRiel (talk) 20:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Riel LP

edit
 

The article Riel LP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Musical recording without significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sam Sailor Sing 10:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of EP de Zombies

edit
 

The article EP de Zombies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Musical recording without significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sam Sailor Sing 10:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Riel (band)

edit
 

The article Riel (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Self-promoting and likely autobiographical article that maybe just passes A7/G11, but fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sam Sailor Sing 11:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

LosRiel, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi LosRiel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey, thanks a lot! LosRiel (talk) 20:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Riel (band), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This diff. Sam Sailor Sing 00:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Riel (band) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riel (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riel (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Sailor Sing 04:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of EP de Zombies

edit
 

The article EP de Zombies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly does not meet WP:NALBUM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Riel LP

edit
 

The article Riel LP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly does not meet WP:NALBUM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
    • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
    • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply