Image:SAAPHYRI WINDSOR.jpg

edit

Hi did you take this pic? dito Image:Saaphyri Windsor2008.jpg Genisock2 (talk) 18:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC) Yes i did Image:Saaphyri Windsor2008.jpgReply

any chance you could send an email to permissions@wikimedia.org confirming this?Genisock2 (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Image:Saaphyri Windsor feb 2008.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Image:Saaphyri Windsor feb 2008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Saaphyri Windsor feb 2008.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 02:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Image:Saaphyri Windsor2008.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Image:Saaphyri Windsor2008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Saaphyri Windsor2008.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 02:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Image:SAAPHYRI WINDSOR.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Image:SAAPHYRI WINDSOR.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:SAAPHYRI WINDSOR.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 02:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Saaphyri 2007.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Lemar Photo Shoot.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Lemar Photo Shoot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Saaphyri Windsor

edit

Could you please use the WP:EDITSUMMARY, and stop breaking the format of the WP:REFERENCES. Also, there is no need to turn the external links section into a WP:LINKFARM. Per WP:ELNO, we should avoid links to social networking sites. One official website link is enough. Also, the {{imdb name}} template is a better way to link to imdb, since it automatically formats the name per WP:MOSBIO. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Saaphyri Windsor. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to I Love Money (season 2), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, you're a winner... of my attention, at least ;) Jack Merridew 03:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Saaphyri Windsor. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not remove sourced content without prior discussion. RexxS (talk) 13:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Saaphyri Windsor. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 20:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply