Welcome!

Hello, Lower458, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hi. Please include verifiable references from reliable sources in edits such as the ones you made to Linda R. Reade. Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ 22:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

thanks Lower458 (talk) 21:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010

edit

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Linda R. Reade, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 05:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

My friend, constructive, I think. If you look objectively, the issue WAS about his "dual citizenship", not the cash or the passports. Everybody has cash and passports. The issue around Judge Reade's decision was re the dual citizenship - according to the sources. Unless you insist on making Judge Reade look better for some reason. You don't have to defend her if the sources don't. Lower458 (talk) 13:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Linda R. Reade. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply