Reviewing your contributions, I must say they are very very welcome, and you with them. These are topics which have long gone neglected. And, also, there are many topics treated here in the language of ethicists and economists who are expressly *not* philosophers, still less political philosophers. While the current politics, political science, ethics and applied ethics are in not-bad shape, many of them deal unevenly with the relationship between these more abstract questions and the practice of law. You can find kernels of sanity, for instance, in the difference between a moral code, ethical code and legal code. But, this rapidly degrades to chaos as you move to the more abstract questions which do not reduce so easily to documentation. EofT

As a start, I would request that you be careful to add articles that you create to list of ethics articles if appropriate, if they contain a substantial ethical debate or are wholly a position in such a debate. This will overlap of course with articles on legal theory - at least, we *hope* our law has something to do with ethics. EofT

If you can manage this highly "political" process neutrally, given that we have fans of classical, Marxist, neoclassical, queer, postmodern and green methodology here (all distinctly different and never mind Islam and the Catholics and Zionists and weirdest of all the *Americans*), it's of great value. No one else has succeeded. I will support you in this where I can. On my User page you will see some combinations of issues that I consider to be particularly thorny, and which have led to persistent NPOV dispute. EofT

Thanks for your work on Trolley problem. BTW, do you know you can sign your name with 4 ~ characters, like ~~~~ that? Evercat 15:30, 24 Aug 2003 (UTC)


Review of integrity requested, as it says a few things about philosophy of law and adversarial process that you may wish to qualify or add links to.

Hello

edit

We've corresponded intermittently following posts you've made on moral philosophy. Hello! Are you still checking this page? --- Charles Stewart 00:08, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply