Lstanley1979

This is Lstanley1979's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Kingsgarden

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for pointing out my mistakes. I will speak to a friend who has now said she can help me edit better.

I see when I mentioned River's new book that the wiki was advertising. This is my mistake.

I wanted to provide information on River, but this is showing to be very hard - considering there is not much information.

Once again I thank you

Kings Garden Sufi

Hello, Kingsgarden. Unfortunately, if River J is starting out, she'd not qualify for a Wikipedia article just yet. Please have a look at the links on the talk page and make sure you understand what Wikipedia is and is not. We're not a social media site; we're an encyclopaedia, which means you can't use us to promote River J's work. Even then, if you are her publicist or publisher, the job of writing an article should be left to a neutral person; you would end up with a significant conflict of interest if you tried to write an article about her work when there was some information about her in the sources we consider reliable.

Sorry for this: please don't take this personally. LouiseS1979^(pigeonhole) 16:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Also, please be considerate when you edit. When you add messages to people's talk pages, please add them to the bottom of the page and sign them using four tildes (~~~~). This helps people keep things organised, and you also deleted my talk page header, which means I have to replace it. Thanks. LouiseS1979^(pigeonhole) 17:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Once again thank you for your time. I'm also sorry you didn't read the wiki I wrote. river j is a he, a well known Sufi poet, but not published.

Sorry if I got things wrong and I am sorry I hurt your ego.

Once again thank you...

...no reply needed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingsgarden (talk • contribs) 18:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Kingsgarden: There was no ego involved and I apologise if I upset you - it wasn't anything personal, as I said; I say this to a lot of people who come to my talk page to discuss articles marked for deletion. The problem is that it doesn't matter if someone is unpublished or not. There needs to have been written, reliable sources out there. Generally, in other markets, that will come with publication. However, if they are well-known in the Sufi community there might be relevant and useful written sources. Just a thought that might help you to look sideways at the issue and that publication isn't the be-all and end-all of Wikipedia (although it definitely helps, since publication usually precedes the wider community discovering their works).

Also, you can use Articles for Creation to get critique and assistance on an article before it goes live. If you do have a conflict of interest as regards this person, then that will help get other people's input as to whether the language sounds promotional or not. LouiseS1979^(pigeonhole) 18:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Navid Khiabani

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I saw your speedy deletion nomination and ask you to have a look at my comments on the talk page in this section Talk:Navid_Khiabani#Needs_in-line_references. _ Govindaharihari (talk) 13:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

You have helped me a lot during your active days by copy-editing my GA nominations, all of them being very helpful. It has been two months since your comeback here. With a hope that you shall make a comeback soon, i leave a kitten here at your talk page as a sign of WikiLove and friendship. Do not forget to ping me when you see this!

Yours sincerely,

Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Pavanjandhyala: - Cute! Thanks! I will definitely be back at some point. I'll give you a shout when I do. LouiseS1979^(pigeonhole) 22:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

When you make a comeback, leave the same kitten on my talk page confirming the same.

Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Royals

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Wedding of Prince Carl Philip, Duke of Värmland, and Sofia Hellqvist.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:56, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Babba! I'm not editing actively at the moment - something had to give when I started a new job. But I'll be back again at some point. LouiseS1979^(pigeonhole) 22:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

My first English article about Komlóstető (part of Miskolc city)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi dear Lstanley1979,

I was happy you tagged my first article and you gave me some instructions. Could you please help me to improve my first article? I don't know what you think about when you wrote the information I put in was irrelevant to an encyclopedic article. What type of information I can share? I live in this suburban area of Miskolc city and due to this reason I would like to make my first article to be more relevant and I would like to be proud of it! :-)

Once again thank you in advance!

Best regards,

Ferenc Lukács

PS.: Sorry for my English and my incidental grammar mistakes!

Lukács Ferenc (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Lukács Ferenc: - hi, it's been a bit of a while since I haven't had time to edit here for a while. Basically, I think the problem was that you included a lot of tourist/travel information on the town, and information more relevant to local people or travellers, whereas what Wikipedia requires is more statistical information and information about notable landmarks (for an idea of what to include, have a look at an article on a large American town; those tend to be the best-written geographical articles). LouiseS1979^(pigeonhole) 22:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Marie Serneholt

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If you want to, please take a look at this weeks TAFI selected article, Marie Serneholt. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Baltic)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I see you are listed as a member of a WikiProject of a Baltic state. I was wondering if anybody who actively works on Estonian, Lithuanian or Latvian articles, would be interested in launching your own Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Baltic), based on the Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) and Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea would be to try to bring about 1000 article improvements and creations on this region as an enjoyable challenge and potentially things like National Contests with prizes. If you'd be interested and think it's something you might regularly contribute to, comment and sign up at Talk:Baltic states. If there is interest we can move this to a project somewhere and set something up, thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

New deal for page patrollers

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Lstanley1979,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply