Your submission at Articles for creation: Cullen Roche (May 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Lsvensen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cullen Roche (May 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

I've had a look at Cullen Roche and I believe he does meet our notability requirements, however I was only satisfied about this after looking through Google and other websites, like FT.com. You will need to add links to coverage of Cullen Roche in mainstream and specialist financial press before we are able to approve the article. If possible, please add more references to sites like http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/05/07/989781/cullen-roche-in-the-ft/ and we will be able to review your submission again. Nick (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cullen Roche (June 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
{{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 19:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Cullen Roche concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cullen Roche, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Cullen Roche

edit
 

Hello Lsvensen. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cullen Roche".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Cullen Roche}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply