Lubnarizvi

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Masterton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Rejoinder

I don't think you're signing your comments via signature button or ~~~~, please try to sign your comments on talk pages and DO NOT manually write your name and date, as signature button or four tildes will automatically stamp your signs & time. Moreover, after making some edits, please add a little summary of your edits before clicking on SAVE PAGE. This lets other know what changes you've made.--_SMS^{Let's talk} 15:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Comment: Thank you very much, what language was that? Hindi? --Lubna Rizvi 15:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that's in Hindi, but still developing. I'm glad you've started signing your comments. --_SMS^{Let's talk} 17:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Comment: I am new to wiki :D thanks for your help. --Lubna Rizvi 17:50, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Can you please edit the page http://pnb.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DB%8C%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%AF --Lubna Rizvi 13:20, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Holiday cheer

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.

Thank you! Marry Christmas and Happy New Year

--Lubna Rizvi 14:01, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

2013

Wishing Everybody a Joyful New Year! --Lubna Rizvi 00:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User_Hell_in_a_Bucket_has_been_very_disruptive_from_day_1. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 11:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your continued accusations of Bias, Manipulation and overall bad faith needs to stop, it has no place here on Wikipedia. Several editors have now also commented on this and it is unacceptable for you to continue. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I can say the same to you! And I can post the same warning on your page! -- Lubna Rizvi 16:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

The main difference is I'm not assuming bad faith or attacking your character personally, you can persist in disrupting the project but it will end in a block. I strongly suggest reading what everyone one the ANI thread is saying and making a good faith effort to work within wiki policy as the community sees it, and again I can show you specific examples of inappropriate behavior on your behalf within wiki policy, you can not although we have asked several times. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I had warned you before not to comment on my page or try to communicate with me. There are many people who have criticized and had concerned about the article but none of them have adopted the tone and attitude that you have. I will suggest leave me alone and I will keep working on the article. I have not launched a personal attack on you, while you did. -- Lubna Rizvi 16:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

As I told you I'm more then happy to oblige and apoligize if you follow policy, you have not backed up any of your accusations and are making bad faith accusations towards my character, calling me Biased, Racist and Rude and manipulative without citing anything to back it up. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Inappropriate use of warning template, constituting personal attack

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. If an editor accuses you of making personal attacks, the absolute last thing you should do is warn them for the same, and then make more personal attacks in your warning. If you plan on making any more accusations against HiaB, please provide evidence; you're a few unfounded allegations away from getting yourself blocked. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 16:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

whatever Hell in the Bucket do is neither vandalism nor any other category that Wikipedia might have. But what I do in response I start receiving the threats from other editors (who are friends to him). I can see he has asked for your help to harasse the new editors. I wonder if this is how Wikipedia works? Everybody can have their own agendas and policies. -- Lubna Rizvi 19:53, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to edit disruptively, you may be blocked from editing. There are numerous problems with your editing, including incivility, threats, unsubstantiated accusations which you have declined to justify when asked to, placing a spurious block notice on the talk page of an IP user who was not blocked, changing another editor's articles for deletion comment to make it say the opposite of what had actually been said, attempts to take ownership of an article and deny others the right to edit it, and numerous examples of inability to distinguish "I disagree with you" from "you are being disruptive". Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and if you are to survive here then you will need to learn to collaborate with other editors, even when you disagree with them. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Signature

Please fix your signature. It is pointing to User:Lubna Rizvi (a non-existing user) instead of User:Lubnarizvi (you). You can have it show one, yet point to the other, which is fine. See WP:SIGNATURE for help. If you have already fixed it, just ignore this friendly note. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 18:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I am just an ignorant person and its a blessing in disguise. -- Lubna Rizvi 19:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I see you have fixed that. Thanks. One more point, though, is that it is more often useful to have a direct link to a user's talk page than to their user page, so you may like to adjust that. It's up to you, but I think it would help. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

thanks -- Lubna Rizvi 20:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, friend

It looks like you're having a bit of a rough go getting up to speed with the culture of Wikipedia. It can be daunting. If I can be of any help to you answering questions of any nature, please do not hesitate to ask. Best regards, — Tim //// Carrite (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Tim :-) -- Lubna Rizvi 11:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Refactoring Talkpage discussion

Lubna please please please do not modify discussion like you just did on your talkpage. Once it's been discussed we need those for records and believe me when I say we've all made that mistake. I'm not trying to pick on you (really) I'm just pointing out that it is not considered good practice here. I hope with time you'll understand that none of this is aimed to run you away and as correctly pointed out by others it's a pretty big task learning all the ins and outs and after four years I still have to learn too. I'd sure like to put all this behind us and encourage you to edit within the scope fo the community. Also for the record you are doing much better then I when I first got here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I have warned you so many times. You have nothing to do with my comments, either I erase them or amend them! How many times I have told you that I don't want to communicate with you. You want to block me go ahead do that. I don't care!!!! Keep your suggestions to yourself!! I know what good faith you are acting on. Just leave me alone!!!-- Lubna Rizvi 01:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

You're right, you can entirely erase anything on here but if you are selectively erasing only parts of the discussion it is considered disruptive to Wikipedia, this is not a suggestion rather an enforcement of wiki policies and guidelines. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

So you know I'm not just making this up the specific guideline is here WP:REDACTED. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) I have also reopened [[1]] this thread per your comments here and my page. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I don't know what language do you understand? do not bite the new user! -- Lubna Rizvi 02:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

This isn't a WP:BITE I'm trying very hard to help show you the policies, I've not once said anything unkind personally to you. I've commented on the content and not the contributor and have extended the olive branch several time also noting your hard work on the Rebecca Masterson article. I'm sorry you don't understand how things work but if you persist in insisting anything that myself and others are trying on your behalf (and editing well being) you won't last here long. New editors are given some leeway with the policies but on your frustration you are going across those bounds. Lubna, please take a minute and step back and try to see what we have been telling you. Seriously it will only help for perspective. Also what are you considering a bite that is found within these guidelines WP:BITE and how have I bitten you? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 02:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Lubna, I think what he is trying to say is it's OK to remove the entire thread (preferably by archiving them), but it is considered bad form to just remove partial comments. The best practice is to set up an archive, where after a certain period of time, the thread is moved to an archive. Others just delete the entire thread from their talk page.

It is the selective removal of individual comments that is frowned upon. You'll get a little more leeway here on your talkpage, but on other pages it can result in a block. No one wants that for you, and from my own experience, it's not fun. Regards, GregJackP Boomer! 02:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

it's nearly 3 a.m. in London, I need to get some sleep and will appreciate if you give it a break. I would really appreciate if you can stop this user to communicate with me further. -- Lubna Rizvi 02:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

• I have commented on the recent Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents section concerning you. I hope my comments are helpful, and I strongly urge you to think carefully about what I have written there. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Lubnarizvi. You have new messages at GregJackP's talk page.
Message added 15:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GregJackP Boomer! 15:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome

Hi, and a belated welcome to Wikipedia - I see you've had a pretty tough introduction to the project! People mean well, but there tends to be a habit of jumping on new articles that aren't quite up to standards yet - and it can seriously discourage newcomers who really can't be expected to know all the rules yet. Anyway, the Rebecca Masterton article looks like it's getting there, and I think there's enough notability to support it as a valid article. I'll try to spend a bit of time helping with addressing the issues listed in all those tags at the top. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! I really appreciate that:-)-- Lubna Rizvi 16:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I've reformatted all the references to use the {{cite web}} template (though one of them doesn't display properly - I don't know why), and I've removed the relevant tag. I also don't see anything that looks promotional to me, so I've removed that tag too and I've explained why on the talk page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you once again:-)-- Lubna Rizvi 18:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Lubnarizvi. You have new messages at Talk:Rebecca Masterton.
Message added 19:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GregJackP Boomer! 19:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

I need help to a make an archive on Rebecca Masterton's talk page. -- Lubna Rizvi 19:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Done,not archive but hide.Justice007 (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

you are an angel, thank you! :-)-- Lubna Rizvi 19:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Lubnarizvi! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by: Visiting our website for resources, events, and more Meet other women and share your story in our profile space Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience! Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Link.

• Hi Lubna, please add the link of your sandbox so that I can access your article. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

**Hello, here is the link :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lubnarizvi/sandbox. Thanks -- Lubna Rizvi 18:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

May be

• I have added some sources though not sure for notability, but I will search more to be sure, then we should move the article on main-space. I have to do more work on it when I have spare time.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 20:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you, I have just put it up on wiki, let see if anybody edits it or even put it for deletion. Finger crossed. I am so much grateful to you for your help. Thanks once again. -- Lubna Rizvi 20:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amina Inloes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irvine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Amina Inloes

• Hi Lubnarizvi, I have cited the sources to the article Amina Inloes, I have now only to fix categories, if you want me to move the article on main space, I do. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 16:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Hello, Please do that and Thank you so so much. -- Lubna Rizvi 17:01, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Since you have made all the changes and done so much of the hard work. You can be the author or the writer of this article. I will remove it from my list. Thank you!-- Lubna Rizvi 17:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Copy and paste moves

Hello, when moving a page in your user sandbox to the main namespace, please don't move it by copy and paste, as you did at Amina Inloes; use the move page function. An administrators' noticeboard thread was filed about the history of the Amina Inloes page. Also, don't move a page into the main namespace until you're sure it's ready. Graham87 07:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)