LucaGaletti95

LucaGaletti95, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LucaGaletti95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 13:54, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Languages of Malta, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Mickey Mouse MM0.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Empire. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:|article's talk page]], and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SeifED23 (talk) 11:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Roman Empire, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Ethiopia

Why did you add Ethiopia to the decolonization of Africa article? Rjrya395 (talk) 22:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Titanic: The Legend Goes On

Hi, have had a look and removed one bad review, leaving five. For balance it needs one or two good reviews, there may be some in the non-English wikipedia articles linked in the sidebar of the article, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Ok, good. Thank you. LucaGaletti95 (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I think that some reviews had to be removed as they are just opinions of non-notable people, so not strong sources, such as the Total Film list (you once called it a "laundry list") and WhatchMojo. They had previously been removed for this reason. The only reliable sources are Linda Maria Koldau and IndieWare. LucaGaletti95 (talk) 11:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• Total Film is a widely distributed film magazine so it is notable but in my opinion only for film reviews, articles, and films being listed at number one of their innumerable lists. Agree that WatchMojo should go but there is an editor there who is insisting on keeping it. Also, if you are also editing as an ip you need to post your ip number on your userpage, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)