Lucianapaola
Welcome!
editHello, Lucianapaola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COI template placement
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi Jim, sorry about this! I couldn't figure out where to put the COI, thought it had to go in the title. It has been added now. Is it possible for the page to be undeleted so I can go ahead and edit out anything that may be biased? Lucianapaola (talk) 13:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, you've successfully placed the template on your user page, right where it belongs.
- It may be best to start over. I can't see what you wrote before, but if it had to be deleted as too promotional, you were probably not writing it from ground up based on what your notability references had to say. Did you have notability references? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
From what I remember, everything was just facts. The problem might have been some things were referenced to the "about us" on the webpage. The other cited references were Insider, New York Post, New York Times, Refinery29, People Magazine and others similar.
Lucianapaola (talk) 20:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- No, that wasn't "just facts". There was quite a bit of storytelling, quotes from the founder, opinions presented as facts, superlatives, and highlighting their selling points. Huon (talk) 20:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
That were all taken from the sources mentioned above. Lucianapaola (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
COI
editIf you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lucianapaola. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lucianapaola|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article
- you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
- The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
- significant coverage in
- independent,
- multiple,
- reliable,
- secondary sources.
- Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
- you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
- there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
- you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Kristen Tomlan and DŌ, Cookie Dough Confections have been moved out of mainspace because you shouldn't be making inclusion decisions on subjects you have a COI on. See WP:AFC. MER-C 17:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi, can you explain what you mean by "inclusion decisions"? From the messages from Jimfbleak above, as long as I have a COI stated and am nonpromotional with notable sources, the pages were good to go.
- The problem with a COI is that when you have one, you are not a good judge of whether you are nonpromotional and whether the sources establish notability. For example, "DŌ gained attention when it was first featured on Glamour and refinery29." - that sounds rather promotional to me, and it's not the only example of problematic content in the page. Thus you should let someone else evaluate the page you wrote instead of creating a live article yourself. I'll add a messagebox with a "Submit your draft for a review" button, but I expect some work will be needed. Huon (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Kristen Tomlan
editHello, Lucianapaola. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kristen Tomlan".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:DŌ, Cookie Dough Confections
editHello, Lucianapaola. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DŌ".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)