edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Lucky In Studio.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 12:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Lucky apra

edit

A tag has been placed on Lucky apra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. EndlessDan 12:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Lucky apra. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.--EndlessDan 12:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate images uploaded

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Luckyapra in studio.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Lucky In Studio.jpg. The copy called Image:Lucky In Studio.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 13:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Note

edit

Please read our policy on conflict of interest. Thank you. DS 14:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Notability of Lucky apra

edit

A tag has been placed on Lucky apra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. EndlessDan 14:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Lucky apra. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.----EndlessDan 14:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply