Luckyles
Welcome!
Hello, Luckyles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!
If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page
Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: ''Have A Nice Day'' 14:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
MASH (film)
editSorry, if it wasn't intentional on your part, but I was expressing my annoyance over the fact that you and IP 82.35.32.63 seemed to be closely collaborating on a long sequence of edits, after which the formatting was left in a mess (with bold text running everywhere). AnonMoos 07:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Your article Johnson and Friends has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 15:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Johnson and Friends again..
editPerfectly alright, someone asked about it on my forum and when I spotted the page I certainly couldn't let it be deleted. I just wish people would search the web before suggesting an article for deletion, a simple google would have shown that the page had a very good right to be there! J&F was a great show! --Jonathandavis 14:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)--Jonathandavis 14:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
We need you too! Thanks for the encouragement, both afterwards and before my minor edit. I read the article through after noting your comments on the talk page. All we can do is each edit a bit as we have time and energy...
Currently considering pulling the Frank Dobson link. He's been the local MP since the year dot ('79?), but there's nothing linking him to Somers Town particularly, and no mention of it on his page. 82.108.13.197 16:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
The One and Only
editHi I think you created the page "The One and Only (film)" on 27th Feb? I had in fact created a page of this film on 24th Feb....any chance you could merge the pages? We seem to have information about the film that could be used in one longer article. I welcome your views.Luckyles 07:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Solved - I included most of the stuff from your article which added to my article, which is in wiki format (except the quote section - lots of debate about those!), and made your page a disambiguation page. You had a number of nice pieces in your article, but have a look how the page is technically constructed - may be use its format as a basis on which to create others articles on other films you notice we are missing here. The only missing items from your article was the categorisation, which is very important as we are an encyclopaedia. Keep up your great work, and if you need some help - please, just ask! With Best Regards, --Ian 22:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi - Many thanks for merging the article. I am still a bit of a novice at starting new articles, so I really appreciate the work you've done. Should I go to a link for help in wikifying an article? Anyway, many thanks for your help on this - Luckyles 11:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Honestly, the best way to learn is to edit! You can find lots of useful links on the first message on your talk page on wiki rules and aids. However, they only convey technical format and take you so far - creating a good article is as much doing as it is the technical standards. So I suggest, if you want to write a new article, firstly look for a good/great article on a similar subject/in the same area, and use that as a template to create your new article around. Create a stub page for your new article, and create it first there - then you can play with it as much as you want! When you are happy, then publish to the main encyclopedia. If you want to help me improve the article on actor Edward Woodward, then have an edit of the stub page in my personal stubs area. If you have any further questions, please come back to me. Best Regards, - Trident13 20:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Rebecca
editThanks for the feedback. Your knowledge of the book is obviously better than mine. It's a long time since I read the book or saw the movie. I was pretty sure that in the movie he was called Max by just about everyone (except Mrs Danvers, of course), which may have been a bit of licence on the part of the scriptwriters. Feel free to change my edits. Cheers JackofOz 21:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Dr Otter looks great, some very good information on there, I have done some formatting and added some links on to tidy things up. Have also added categories to the article to remove the "uncategorised" tag that someone has added to the page.
Let me know how it looks! --Jonathandavis 09:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Le bal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Jonathan letters to the editor—my work 18:13, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
October 2007
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Le bal. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Jonathan letters to the editor—my work 18:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Le bal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Jonathan letters to the editor—my work 18:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, as you did with Le bal, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jonathan letters to the editor—my work 18:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Poldark, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Poldark is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Poldark, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on The Royal School, Hampstead, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of The Royal School, Hampstead and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Luckyles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr Otter, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Otter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)