Lucysim

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Christina Billotte, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Christina Billotte was changed by Lucysim (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-10-15T07:51:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Christina Billotte. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 21:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Christina Billotte, you will be blocked from editing. Please provide an explanation for the removal in an edit summary or mention why you think the change should be made on the talk page. Thanks. The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 04:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Christina Billotte. Alansohn (talk) 12:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Please note that this editor's edits to Christina Billotte are not vandalism. She appears to be removing unsourced WP:BLP information. Toddst1 (talk) 15:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Personal info/Christina Billotte

Hi. I'm an administrator here on the English language Wikipedia. It looks like you've had a bit of a rough start with those messages above but I think I have figured out what's going on.

It seems that you might be either the subject of or closely connected to the subject of one of our articles and are displeased with some of the contents. See Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject) for a general overview of ways to get problems fixed (as well as an email address). You can also mention specific problems on Talk: Christina Billotte if you want specific mistakes corrected.

The email address is info-en-q@wikimedia.org. The first thing you might be asked to do is to privately establish your identity.

In the short-term, I've removed the personal info and temporarily protected the page. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. The best way to reach me is to leave a message on my talk page or you can go there and click the link on the left to send me a private email. Toddst1 (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The link on the left I was referring to was if you go to my talk page, there is a link titled, E-mail this user. However, at this point it might be best to use the email address I mentioned above (info-en-q@wikimedia.org).

I've noticed you're still removing referenced/cited info on Christina Billotte. That has to stop. Toddst1 (talk) 04:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Christina Billotte

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Christina Billotte. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Billotte. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:23, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for removal of cited content because of apparent personal objection despite instructions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 04:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)