LuigiPortaro29

Benniejets sock

Special:Contributions/80.181.119.244 looks to be Benniejets again. I've reported him at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Benniejets. - BilCat (talk) 12:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

This guy has some problem or is misanderstanding.No time to waste with him.80.181.119.244 (talk) 12:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

If I'm wrong, I'll apologize. If I'm right, you'll just come back on another IP. And we'll do this all over again. And again. - BilCat (talk) 12:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Guys , Honestly i'm tired of all this situation, it is very easily to respect the norms of Wikipedia, if we dont want to respect it , then could be problems!LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 22:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Another Benniejets sock

Special:Contributions/LittleOx looks to be Benniejets again. How can I report him at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Benniejets?

It's clearly him. Most of his edits are small edits adding or deleting a letter or a word, and many of them were reverting his own changes. Until he gained a decent amount of edits, he started to edit the same pages as the original Benniejets and his tonnes of clones did. Mostly focusing on List of European countries by average wage and adding some false data to them, then Italy and Economy of Italy amongst others. --TechnicianGB (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello! honestly I also think that he is Benniejets, and so stupid that he is not even clever, he easily lets himself be discovered!LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 08:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You did an awesome job at reverting hard to identify vandalism made by an IP to multiple country lists. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

For more information about the case, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Hard_to_revert_IP_vandalism ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Edits to List of International Space Station visitors

Hi Luigi,

I updated the above mentioned page today. I added sources to all of the new astronaut members of the list and added more sources to the ones that were already there. The tables do not have sources since they are just an enumeration, so I incremented all of the items as appropriate.

I would appreciate it if you could reinstate my edits.

Thank you and best regards,

Claas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.128.39.1 (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi and welcome! regarding about this edit [1] as we see is unsourced. Have you a reliable source?. However all the content of that page lacks of a reliable source, we should find sources and discuss on talk page. LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 23:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Luigi,

this is the first time for me actually editing something on Wikipedia, so forgive my ignorance. The actual list of ISS visitors on the above mentioned site is fully sourced. The only thing that isn't sourced is the summary and the tables above the list. Since the numbers given in those tables are the derived from the list of visitors, I can't think of a way how to source them correctly. NASA has a site (https://www.nasa.gov/feature/visitors-to-the-station-by-country) that lists the visitors by country and the number of times they visited, but to completely source the tables we still need to extract gender and space agency. Again, I don't know of any source that contains this information.

I can add the NASA site as a source, is that okay?

Cheers,

Claas 46.128.39.1 (talk) 21:32, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi :) , well.. that is a great reliable source! we should update this data in the table, Be free to add it, and if you want to start an open discussion on Talk Page about the sources , you are also welcome to do it!

Regards. LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

List of European countries by population

Hi LuigiPortaro29, thanks for helping clean up the population numbers table! I'm not sure what that IP 90.255.145.51 was doing, but I suspect they have some kind of formula they're using to calculate population projections, which would be original research. I made some comments on the talk page about that earlier. I just left them a couple of warnings about adding unsourced content.

The other IP 83.27.220.86 is definitely a sock puppet of blocked user Ufufcguc (talk · contribs), known for adding/inventing unsourced information, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ufufcguc. A lot of the sources are dead links too. It looks to me though, like the List of countries and dependencies by population is in pretty good shape, so it might be easier to just copy things over from there, rather than going in and checking each citation to see if the numbers really match or not, or if there a newer sources.

Fyi, for now I'm just going to change back the number for Russia again, since I did update the citation to the 2018 version. I got it from the main Russia article (under "note 5" in the infobox), and it also agrees with the List of countries and dependencies by population number... --IamNotU (talk) 23:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi and welcome IamNotU , thank you for your message, I checked the source of Russia and yes you're right. seems that I Have made fast the revision, I apologize. I'll come back for see better the discussion about that page. would be good if we make a request for a protection of the page, thanks. LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 23:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

No need to apologize... That's a good idea, I will request page protection if either of the IPs continue to be a problem in the next days. Hope you have a nice holiday! --IamNotU (talk) 01:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks , wishing you the same! :) LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 09:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Italian language

Ciao, sei italiano vero? Beh, pure io. Volevo parlarti della pagina sulla lingua italiana (Italian language) L'italiano è riconosciuto come lingua minoritaria in Romania e Bosnia-Herzegovina, come riporta l'European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Ho citato più e più volte diverse fonti e aperto una sezione nella talk page, ma come puoi vedere un certo utente continua ad annullarle per ragioni senza senso, arrivando persino a definirmi un troll. Ti andrebbe di controllare la situazione o almeno partecipare alla discussione nella talk page? Grazie DavideVeloria88 (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

G7

Russia has even too much weight in G7 article.It never was member of it.G7 is based on financial data while G7 is a political forum.Totally different fora. 82.59.149.59 (talk) 13:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

List of modern great powers

Hi LuigiPortaro29. I'm assuming you saw my edits to the structure of post WWII sections of List of modern great powers‎. I wanted to let you know that I am not certain this is the best structure for article/section, but what was there previously was just unsalvagable. If you think there is a better organization, please do be bold and implement it. Other thoughts: 1) The rest of the article is in poor shape generally, formatting is a mess, the structure is questionable, salvageable material needs ce, and the pro-western bias should be addressed. 2) The lead has no criteria 3) the sourcing for the sections often lack RS that refer to entries as great powers. 4) I was thinking the structure of the article may work well with a section for "Global" great powers and a second for "Regional" great powers, with appropriate sections for the individual powers.

I'm not sure what you're thoughts are, but I wanted to let you know my thoughts on the article; it has great potential.

Best wishes from Los Angeles, 21:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello and welcome! that structure has been added recently [2] [3] I'm not sure if that is the right structure ,neither enthusiasm. let's see what the sources say and what other users thinks about, if there is no reaction then that section should be fixed as well all the structure. even if a post cold war list could be good for the modern era

Best wishes back from Europe , Regards and Have a nice day!--LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 23:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your edits...

... need clarification. You removed sourced content without explanation. I reverted and added a standard notice here in support. You reverted the notice with the summary: "Nothing to discuss, Turkey do not appears in the World Naval Hierarchy of Todd & Lindberg. If you don't even have time to check the sources, this message is simply a mess. If you like Turkey to be listed then be happy.".

But despite there being "nothing to discuss", you posted a comment on the Blue-water navy talk page anyway, but it unfortunately makes as little sense as this comment. You're comment also appears to be needlessly hostile. If you could just engage, either here or on the article talk page (I replied there as well), focusing just on content, and explain;

1. why you removed the entry for Turkey,
2. whether you believe the entry should be there,
3. if so at what level,
4. and what issue you have with the refs on that page.

Thank you - wolf 21:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)