Luisricardodelarosa
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Southern_California/Ecological_Factors_in_Design_(Spring_2019) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Luisricardodelarosa, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Peer Review Comments
editThe last sentence of the lead paragraph is a little bit confusing: "The term sustainable urban drainage system[1][5] is not the accepted name,[by whom?] the 'Urban' reference having been removed so as to accommodate rural sustainable water management practices.[6][7]"
"The goal of all sustainable drainage systems is to use naturally occurring rainfall to recharge the water sources of a given site." "naturally occurring" is unnecessary and should be deleted.
"The paradigm of SuDS solutions should be that of a system that is easy to manage,..." This part of the sentence is confusing.
Reed beds should be described or should be a link to a wiki article on Reed Beds.
The fourth paragraph of the Background section writes SUDS, whereas the rest of the article writes SuDs. The way it is typed should be consistent throughout the entire article.
In the fourth paragraph of the Background section urban is typed in parentheses but I don't think they are necessary.
The last paragraph of the Background section says "Paving or building over land can result in flash flooding." This information was already stated earlier in the article.
Are there any Asian examples of SuDs that the article can discuss to make the examples more geographically diverse?
Overall the article is thorough and provides good examples. The article as a whole can be cleaned up to be more precise.Drewbarrie (talk) 21:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)