User talk:Luk/Archives/2010

Previous conversations prior to 1 January 2010 (UTC) are archived there.

Season's greetings

Thank you for being one of the people who has made 2009 such an interesting and enlightening year for me. It has certainly had its challenges, but also many highlights. I wish you peace and contentment in 2010, and a joyous holiday season to you and yours. In honour of the season, I hope you will enjoy a little musical token. Your choice: traditional or cheeky. Best, Risker (talk) 02:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Best Wishes for 2010, FloNight♥♥♥♥ 23:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Question: Articles 1530 BC xxxxBC etc.

Question: Articles 1530 BC xxxxBC etc.

Hello!

Would you please explain me why the wikipedia has nearly only christian reminiscents according to the article series 1530 BC. Why are there are no 1530 BCE - articles, respectively?

I would like to mention, that BC means Before Christ - which is a christian confession of faith and never a neutral appointment. Whereas BCE can be rendered Before Common Era or Before Christian Era alike, which is was more strong neutral appointment.

Would you please help me on this - or guide me where I may get help?

Sincerely --87.160.202.82 (talk) 14:39, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 10:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Luk! Thank you for your kind answer:

"Hi, I see that you have raised it at the correct place. My opinion is that BC being shorter and most widely used in the "real" world, you would have a hard time convincing everyone to switch to BCE. Should you gather a sufficient consensus that people use both systems, we could have someone create the corresponding redirections. As of yourself, you apparently can use them indistinctly on Wikipedia when you write a new article (even if I find this confusing). -- Luk ^talk 10:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)"

I would like to add, that once the english wikipedia _had_ both BCE and BC systems and IMHO has now changed towards a christian style. In most book or literature in general, concerning both Judaism and Islam, I see it different than you: The books, texts and articles on this - in the "real world" - rather use the _more neutral_ BCE and CE respectively (instead of the christian terms BC or AD). Its kind of a reminiscence to the christian supremacy claim over both "old" (sic!) judaism and islam!. Sincerely --87.160.198.91 (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Aldaric acids

would you like to revise the gif you made for the page. I changed the text to galactose from mannose........

thanks!

I have never edited or talked before so...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torotetrado (talk • contribs) 20:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of 'Mark Carder'

You deleted the page entitled 'Mark Carder'. Mark Carder is the artist who painted the official presidential painting of George W. Bush in 2008.[1] This clearly warrants a Wikipedia entry. IainUK (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your reply. I will have a go at the article this week. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IainUK (talk • contribs) 18:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 20:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of the Episerver

Hi Luk

wondering whay the page on Episerver has been removed from wikipedia? The last reference I could find was that it was removed by you, but that was 2 years ago. It does not seem right, since the page got removed earlier this week, so in early February 2010. Any help you can provde is much appreciated

Kind regards Mariawas --Mariawas (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

User:RoboHomo

Do you have evidence that RoboHomo (talk · contribs) is a sock of Mykee881222 (talk · contribs) or Vladimir Steffoff (talk · contribs), or is this an assumption you are making? I have my concerns about RoboHomo, but I did not think his edits were "sockish". WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Direct match on their IP :) I was as surprised as you. -- Luk ^talk 17:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll be more wary in the future. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:49, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi,

Can you please delete this image? (because it was copied from a website without permission).

--Amazonien (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done :) -- Luk ^talk 08:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Talk Page

Why did you delete the talk page for File:CannabisSeeds.jpg? Unless the image itself just has not been deleted yet, the talk page contained the image-class template for WikiProject Cannabis. If the image has been deleted, why? (It is in the public domain). --Another Believer _(Talk) 03:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 08:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. However, deleting the talk page removed the image-class template that belonged to WikiProject Cannabis. Are we not supposed to be adding WikiProject templates to the talk pages of images? Or can the template be added to the talk page over at Commons? --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Sanam001 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Menon1000/Archive

You may be interested in Sanam001's unblock request per a check you recently ran. Regards, –MuZemike 23:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

1. Proposal to Close This RfC
2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Editing blocked from IP

Hello Luk, A while back, you blocked editing from 198.189.140.0/22. I did request for an administrator to allow me to login with my account here a while back and my request was followed. Why is this IP blocked, though? This is a large higher educational institution (with several tens of thousands of students), and I assume there are others who would be interested in contributing to Wikipedia and who would be valuable contributors to it. JBFrenchhorn (talk) 19:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Looking at my logs, someone was creating multiple accounts there used solely for vandalism. I can't really recall if it was widespread (eg: if the network was compromised and someone used it as a proxy) or if it was a student there. Since it's going to expire later this month anyway, I'm gonna lift it now. -- Luk ^talk 13:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Mmm my block was supposed to only block anonymous users, I guess my finger slipped. I have removed your IP Block exemption since it is no longer needed :). -- Luk ^talk 13:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. JBFrenchhorn (talk) 07:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Frédéric Chopin

Luk,

Would you mind checking my last edit at article Frédéric Chopin page. Several edits done by Noozgroop (talk were disruptive & had not been caught by other editors who brought changes afterward. In order to revert all of Noozgroop's edits, I went back to last by Graham87, then worked my way back reestablishing good revisions; however, I am not sure that I did well with your change of Chopin's 1847 photograph.

Cordialement, --Frania W. (talk) 20:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

No worries, it's all good. Worst case scenario, the bot would pick it up again at its next run :). -- Luk ^talk 18:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Please advise regarding your text addition to Template:uw-lblock

Hello. It appears that you authored part of the {{uw-lblock}} template that is now under discussion at WT:UTM # Legal. If you could help clarify, it would be appreciated. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

expired block still in place somehow

See [2] Am I wrong or was this intended to expire a long time ago? For some reason it still shows up as an active block, and someone is asking for an unblock of the ip. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

The block expired, but there's a rangeblock on 170.213.0.0/16. You should probably ask J.delanoy :) -- Luk ^talk 08:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I'll do that. Is it just a software glitch that it still shows your block as active? Beeblebrox (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

That's weird, I see it as expired on IPBlockList? The rangeblock doesn't appear on individual IPs block log, I guess you see mine instead? -- Luk ^talk 22:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism Acts by User Sanam001

This is user [3] is involved in Vandalism activities. Please stop him. He's changing articles, before having proper discussions, reaching consensus. It is not a way to edit wikipedia. It is not at all the first time he's doing such vandal acts.90.46.32.29 (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that content disagreement is not vandalism. I unfortunately can't mediate disputes, but there are several ways of asking for help (for example asking for a third opinion) in these circumstances. -- Luk ^talk 17:17, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

He is abusing ethnic groups such as Ezhava and Nair by claiming that they were Sudra, their women were concubines and Nair men are like dogs. He is actively pushing forward with his hate speech for the past 3 months and no one is stopping him. And above all, he is using a University Library Ezproxy to edit wikipedia. Axxn (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The third opinion has been done. People disagree with his statements, POV; but he's still continuing with his disruptive edits. It is not normal at all.90.46.32.29 (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

That is true. If you look at the Nair talk page, you can clearly see that the 3O has been done and people there very much disagree with his rampant POV pushing. Suresh.Varma.123 (talk) 02:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I urge you to ban this guy and stop his POV forking and hate speech. Suresh.Varma.123 (talk) 02:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

My issue is the content, The issues of content dispute is an anthropological one and complex issue . Can we we work out a dispute resolution through an arbitration committe comprising of anthropologists/social scientists to comment the scientific validity of references cited by individual parties with dispute. I am ready to comply to it.--Sanam001 (talk) 18:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Due to failure of resolution of content dispute using WP:30 and multi-party discussion and given the sensitivity of issue and tendency to detour in to personal allegations during objective content dispute, the best way may be formal mediation of content dispute. I kindly request Anandks007 and suresh.varma 123 to help me in taking the dispute resolution to next stage. I would be greatly thankful to the administrator if he could impress upon these users to go to the next level of dispute resolution so as to avoid future edit conflicts. Kindly refere http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/_Nayar-content_dispute-3O_and_consensus_failed --Sanam001 (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Guys, I can't and won't help you in this matter. My hands are unfortunately already full. -- Luk ^talk 08:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

SPI

Could you please explain what you mean by this comment? Does that mean that you prefer not to block the IP range? Or you prefer not to block any of the users? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:50, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I prefer not blocking the range as it would affect innocent users :). -- Luk ^talk 20:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

OK -- gotcha. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Your deletions

Could you please throttle back your deletions? They're taking over Recent changes. Woogee (talk) 07:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

That batch should stop in a few minutes. I'll slow it down for next run :) (I was a bit greedy this time). -- Luk ^talk 07:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.  :) Woogee (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm killing some workers now, because it feels like I'm killing the wiki at this rate. That should be more bearable until they finish (each one is supposed to check and deal with 250 images). -- Luk ^talk 08:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Sochi 2014 - please advise

The logo of Sochi 2014 Olympics has been deleted from Commons ; it is possible - legit - to undelete the wikipedia version which you deleted and put it in the article, claiming fair use ? Thanks for your opinion. Hektor (talk) 22:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Czech Airlines logo 2007.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Czech Airlines logo 2007.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Lucasbfrbot damage to Louis Prang

The edit of 13:24, 28 February 2010 apparently worked, but the apparently similar edit of an hour later did not. I have fixed the page. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Indeed oO. This is weird, the bot should never go through the same set of images twice, I'm sorry for the inconvenience... For now I'll assume this was either an error from my part (for example if 2 instances ran concurrently) or an issue with Wikipedia which told the bot the old image was still on the page. Rest assured that I have never encountered it before... :/ If/When I run it again, I'll be extra careful. Thanks a lot for the notice! -- Luk ^talk 12:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Old block followup

Hello Luk,

A vandal closely matching IPs and behavior associated here with Genesis vandalism has been targeting the olpc wiki for a year, and has recently become threatening. I started leaving a comment here because you had blocked the first two IPs I matched... would it be useful to leave that sort of cross-wiki comment on the WP:LTA page?

Thank you, –SJ+ 20:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Your assistance please

You concluded the {{prod}} on Maulana Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi.

According to the Daily Times a Maulana Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi was the Punjab's chief minister’s adviser on religious affairs.

Could you please check to see if the article that was prodded was about that individual? It it was could you userify it for me, to User:Geo Swan/review/Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi?

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 14:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 15:17, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response.

I am going to add the reference I have, fix the inline URL that hasn't gone 404, and ask the person who placed the {{prod}} if the article still concerns them. Correct me if I am mistaken -- the rules for {{prod}} would authorize me to move the improved version back to article space, even if the prod nominator still objected? And if they objected strongly enough their option would be to initiate an {{afd}}?

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Pity the Fool

Hey Luk! Please can you help me with my page, its called Pity the Fool and has been deleted and I really dont know why. I got this message at first and really need assistance. Thanks a mil! Daniel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielptf (talk • contribs) 14:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Decide on this move request.

Hi,

Kindly go through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swami_Vivekananda#Moving_to_original_page_.27Vivekananda.27 and decide on the move request. the current article lies with honorific. the original page is without honorific. Wasifwasif (talk) 07:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I was out of the city for a few days and just came back tonight! Sorry! :( -- Luk ^talk 20:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Some questions

Hi Luk. Would you like to have one of these?: {{user:Luis M. Oida/ access}} I can make you one. 23:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aca31 (talk • contribs)

Hi :) No thanks :) -- Luk ^talk 14:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Alexei Kondratiev

I would like to start a new article about Alexei Kondratiev. Wikipedia had the following note about a deleted article that apparently didn't include sources and mentioned just one of his books.

"16:51, 6 March 2008 Luk (talk | contribs) deleted "Alexei Kondratiev" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: unsourced, Wiccan author of one book)"

Is the text of the old article still available? If so, how can I access it? Folklore1 (talk) 14:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 15:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! This gives me a helpful starting point. Folklore1 (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Stingray?

Hi there, I recently received a message from you alleging that I had vandalised the stingray page. I can't remember editing that page, and if I did it certainly wasn't with vandalism (or experimentation) in mind. Could you point me to what exactly it is I'm supposed to have done?

Thanks Dave 87.242.157.34 (talk) 13:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

I re-read your message and followed the link provided. What can I say? It wasn't me. I don't know how or why wikipedia has associated that edit with me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.242.157.34 (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Having read even more, it seems the edit was made in 2006, and was certainly somebody else who had this IP address at the time. Sorry to bother you with this old news, I was just a bit shocked to read someone accusing me of vandalism. Dave 87.242.157.34 (talk) 13:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Haha, no problem :). Yeah that person is probably long gone now. Sorry if that message scared you! :) -- Luk ^talk 14:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TintinCongo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TintinCongo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

It's currently being used, and has been for a while now. Db issue? -- Luk ^talk 08:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your AIV report on 66.36.229.140

Sorry about that; I thought it said june 2010 on the warning, not may. My bad. thoriyan 21:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Help with Updating Images on Wiki

Hey Luk!

I am trying to replace the poster art for Sony Pictures Classics on the Get Low wiki page to reflect the correct design. Could you tell me how I can go about doing so? If you could, I'd really appreciate it.

Thanks!

Jamie

Tr1ckjamie (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Happy John Uvwiefenigwere (WP.Userfy)

Please help restore an article titled 'Happy John Uvwiefenigwere' which was deleted on 10 Feb 2010. Many thanks for your assistance. Tokeda (talk) 10:16, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

 Done by B (talk · contribs) -- Luk ^talk 10:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Deleting images

When you delete images as at the log above, you must ensure that you replace the image appropriately. For all I can tell, the article concerned, leopard, has been without a distribution map for over 18 months. Please ensure that you perform image deletions correctly in future by checking the appropriate "what links here" page. Thank you. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 23:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

This image was deleted in 2008, which kind of makes the matter stale. I can't be sure, but there used to be a commons version. I have all reasons to believe the image was visible there at the time. Cordially, -- Luk ^talk 12:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Conversation on admin noticeboard re: block of ISP for low-income users

I have started a conversation regarding a block of an ISP for low income users that was initiated two and a half years ago and was recently lifted. You were one of the people that helped review the initial block or helped review it when it was lifted. I am cordially inviting you to join in the conversation.
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Two and a half year block of ISP for low-income users
Thank you very much for you thoughtful consideration. - Hydroxonium (talk | contribs) 03:51, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Commented there. Thanks for the notice! -- Luk ^talk 11:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Nimi61

Hello Luk. Back in 12 February 2008 you deleted User talk:Nimi61. I don't suppose that this long a time afterwards you either remember or care about this page, but I thought as a courtesy I should let you know that I have undeleted it. I have undeleted it for the following reasons: (1) we normally do not delete user talk pages unless there are quite exceptional reasons, and I can see no such exceptional reason in this case; (2) the editor has recently returned to editing after a break of over two years, and since the editor's history consists largely of creating unsuitable pages, it may be useful to have a record of the user's warnings in case the same pattern continues. If you do have a good reason for thinking the page should be deleted please let me know, and of course re-delete it. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Nops, go ahead :). It looks like someone requested the User Page to be deleted (I don't really remember what was the spirit of the community back then) and I extended the courtesy to the talk page. -- Luk ^talk 18:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Tera Melos Wiki?

Hey Luk,

The Wiki page for the band Tera Melos was recently deleted and I wanted to know why. The reasoning was listed that it was "an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject." So I'm assuming that this means the band is not seen as important? That's just not true. 1. Who's to say how important a band (or anything really) is? It's a personal opinion, and 2. This band has quite a following and should therefore be seen as important. It seems like the whole idea of Wikipedia (getting information to anyone about damn near anything) is kinda destroyed when something like this is taken out without reasoning besides personal opinion. Apparently the original deleter was this fellow: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SchuminWeb.

Thank you and hopefully I can see that page back up soon :)

Alek —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.211.15.77 (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 10:06, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry but "I don't think the band is big enough (yet) to warrant an article on Wikipedia." seems like a really badly justified reason to take something off Wikipedia... Plus, Tera Melos definitely meets the "criterion for bands" defined by Wikipedia. Do your research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.247.235.178 (talk) 14:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Replying here, since it appears your IP is dynamic. The last part of my comment was merely my personal opinion and not the reason why the content was deleted. The deletion has been carried under the speedy deletion process:

“ The criteria for speedy deletion specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus support to, at their discretion, bypass deletion discussion and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media.(...)

• An article about a [band] that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

”

There is no research to be done. If the article (as it did at the time) doesn't assert the significance of the subject, it shouldn't be kept (or it would be impossible to manage and would deleted very quickly as not meeting the notability criteria. Cheers! -- Luk ^talk 15:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Tera Melos Wiki

Alright not exactly how to directly respond to your reply so this will have to do for now.

After doing some simple google work I've found 4 (though finding more would be easy) "non-trivial published works" relating to the band.

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2010/07/tera-melos/ http://musicremedy.com/t/tera-melos/album/patagonian-rats-8835.html http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/5802/Tera-Melos-Tera-Melos/ http://www.absolutepunk.net/showthread.php?t=208107

These clearly shows that the band "has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable." So obviously the Wiki should be put up again.

Thank you,

Alek —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.211.15.77 (talk) 20:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Tera Melos page deletion

I realize you are following up on schuminwebb's work but I would like to know why the page was not flagged for deletion first, thus giving a chance for cleanup. A band with over 1,000,000 plays on last.fm is significant (that only just begins to cover the matter, but it is a reliable site that simply shows you what people listen are listening to). I do not understand why Tera Melos was singled out in this case. Cyclopseslayer (talk) 07:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 15:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

The Tera Melos page should not have been deleted. So is there any way you can undo that and put the information back up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.137.229.142 (talk) 07:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

See above. -- Luk ^talk 15:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Parle Magazine Page

Hi there, I'm unaware as to why the page for Parle Magazine was deleted. I was working on it and then came back to check and it was gone. Please forward me any information as to how I may retrieve this page back, thank you very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyleranthonyyang (talk • contribs) 22:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 15:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Tera melos

Tera melos needs it's page back!! They have more than 2 releases on a record label. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.182.95.129 (talk) 06:28, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

As it stood, the article didn't meet the criteria for inclusion. I have no personal opinion on the subject of the article since it went through speedy deletion. If you wish to bring it up to our standards without restarting from scratch, You may register an account, and I will move it to your userspace sp you can work on it. Cheers. -- Luk ^talk 12:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Guinea Page Deleted

I'd like to ask your reasons for deleting the page on the ethnic slur "guinea"...was it simply offensive to you, lacking enough relevance or what? Sauceyboy (talk) 07:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Luk/Notebook

Something on this page is putting it into CAT:CSD, the list of pages tagged for speedy deletion. At a quick look, I can't see what; but you might want to fix it before the page gets zapped. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Forget it - been fixed. There was some funny transclusion in the SPI pages that was confusing things. JohnCD (talk) 20:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Luk ^talk 12:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice

A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. A Horse called Man 12:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
You received this message because you participated in the earlier ArbCom secret ballot RFC.

Dino Elefante

Dino Elephante should not have been deleted. His brother John may be more famous, but Dino made quite a name for himself as a professional musician and producer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.250.79.235 (talk) 08:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 12:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

How did you make sub-pages to your page?

Hi Luk,

I liked the way you made sub-pages to your page. Refer : https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/User:Luk#Other_Stuff

Below it there's something called sub-pages. How does one create it? Please answer on my talk page Shirishag75 (talk) 07:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Replied on this user's talk page - 13:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-mos4

Template:Uw-mos4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 21:09, 18 December 2010 (UTC)