Welcome!

edit

Hi Lukas31! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Kmhkmh (talk) 07:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Lukas31! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit
 

Hello Lukas31. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lukas31. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lukas31|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello DoubleGrazing, thank you for your response.
While I am employed by AstroLabs, I am not paid to make those edits and I make them out of my own initiative in a good will of providing relevant information. Please advise if even in such case I should add a disclaimer.
Thank you Lukas31 (talk) 13:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Cryptic 13:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is really saddening. I believe my edits are valuable and objective, instead of explaining what edits I got wrong I only get threats - I don't find that very constructive, neither beneficial Lukas31 (talk) 10:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply