Lusum

Welcome!

Hello, Lusum! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MahangaTalk 03:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Soltam M-65

Hi, I am the original editor of this article which you had tagged for speedy deletion and it has been deleted already by the admin. I am curious as to why you had tagged it as such? FYI, I had written the page in my own words (accounting for about 75% of it), the rest were borrowed from that website you've mentioned. If that is not allowed, then would a complete rewrite be acceptable instead? Please clarify this with me, thank you. --Dave1185 (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

this page date is sab 28 gen 2006 22:21:58 CET and your article is written in 2008. ( ps: sorry for my bad english ). I have made a control line by line of your article and the site. Most of article ( at least 75% ) is equal to site and a 10% are lines cut and pasted in other places. So i have decided to put the template for delection. I assume good faith, but the similarity was too much. Lusum (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

i think that a complete rewrite, removing some sentences and using other words would be acceptable, using the facts explained in the site's page but not exact words Lusum (talk) 00:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

• Okay, I shall rewrite the article completely in my own words again later tomorrow and I request that you assist to edit check it for me but please let me know if any part(s) needs to be improved on instead of you tagging it again for deletion. How about that? And for heaven's sake, I hate fragmented discussion... so can we keep the discussion here instead of letting us run around? I do monitor your page after leaving you a message here. Thanks. --Dave1185 (talk) 02:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, i agree. I will assist to edit check when you will have rewrited the article. I'm on en wiki quite seldom, but i will try to be here more often. Lusum (talk) 09:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

AGF

As per Wikipedian's requirement, you need to assume good faith and might want to read up on these article below: -

1. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion,
2. Wikipedia:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built,
3. Wikipedia:There is no deadline,
4. Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state,
5. Wikipedia:The Most Important Thing Possible,
6. Wikipedia:Assume bad faith; &
7. Wikipedia:A nice cup of tea and a sit down.

--Dave1185 (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lusum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)