whenever there is something I am not quite sure about, or not happy about... then this seems good place to list it!

edit

Received request to verify conformance of image with Wikipedia policy (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). Request was received from Rmhermen 04:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

--hope I completed the copyright OK. I also received approval from the current Prior of the Order. lxs 16:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

--added comments to image store to indicate that permission has also been granted by a senior representative of the order. lxs 00:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shield-IVISHFS.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Shield-IVISHFS.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shield-IVISHFS.gif

edit

Neglected to log-in to see this fair use dispute in good time. This is a shame as the image has since been deleted. Must admit to being curious as to why this particular image fails the fair use test, when the RAEng image I uploaded passes. I appreciate the need for due care to be taken when uploading copyright material, sadly I am not sure as to what additional justification I can offer other than emailed permission from a senior representative of the knightly order. I shall review the templates on offer to verify if I can rapidly comply with the 'legal paperwork', otherwise the deletion shall remain. lxs (talk) 11:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

01:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Victoria Arduino

edit

Hello Lxs,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Victoria Arduino for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 TT me 02:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply