M.Hugo Windisch-Graetz
|
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:CStelling 0003 14112005.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:CStelling 0003 14112005.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC) --M.Hugo Fürst zu Windisch-Graetz 10:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC) [2]
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Albero di Famiglia.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Albero di Famiglia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Naohiro19 revertvandal (talk) 08:31, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
--M.Hugo Fürst zu Windisch-Graetz 10:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC) [3]
File source problem with File:WG WAPPEN.jpg.jpg
edit
Thank you for uploading File:WG WAPPEN.jpg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
WINDISCH-GRAETZ
edit
'WINDISCH-GRAETZ REICHSFÜRSTEN"erteilten Laut eines von Kaiser Ferdinand I, im Jahre 1557 einem Zweige dieses Geschlechts erteilten Grafendiploms wird der Familie bestätigt, dass der Stammvater derselben, Weriand, welcher als Graf und Herr von Graetz in der Windischen Mark 1090–1120 erscheint, ein jüngerer Sohn des Markgrafen Ulrich von Kärnten aus dem Hause des Grafen von Weimar gewesen sei. Die erste Spaltung in zwei Linien erfolgte im 15.Jahrhundert, wo di Söhne Sigismunds von Windisch-Graetz: Ruprecht und Sigismund die väterlichen Güter teilten. Sigismunds Linie (die jüngere) teilte sich mit seines Enkels Seyfried Söhnen: Sebastian und Jacob II. in zwei Äste, von denen der des Sebastian bereits mit seinem Ururenkel erlosch. Jacob II. Söhne waren Wilhelm und Johann. Des Ersteren Deszendenz erlosch 1648 mit seinem Sohn Siegfried Adam Freiherrn v.W. Johanns Söhne: Moritz und Johann Leonhard teilten den Jacob’schen Ast in zwei Zweige. Johann Leonhards Sohn Johann Christoph erhielt i. J. 1682 den Grafenstand; sein Urenkel Anton starb 1760 als Letzter dieses Zweiges. Moritz‘ Sohn: Johann Ernst (alias Friedrich) erlangte 1682 ebenfalls den Reichsgrafenstand. Doch erlosch auch dieser Zweig mit des Letzteren Enkel Franz, k.k. w. Kämmerer 1828. Das Freiherrndiplom für diese Linie ist ausgestellt für die obengenannten Gebrüder Sebastian und Jacob ( und ihre Vettern von der älteren Linie) d.d. Wien 7. Juli 1551 für Reich und Erblande, unter dem Namen: Windisch-Graetz, Freiherren zu Waldstein und im Tal vom Römischen Koenig Ferdinand I. Desgleichen erhielten dies eben von demselben d.d; Wien 21. November 1557 eine Regulierung ihres Familienwappens. Das Grafendiplom ist erteilt dem Adam, Johann Christoph, Jacob Ludwig, Johann Ernst und Johann Jacob für Reich und Erblande mit Titel „Hoch- und Wohlgeboren“ d.d. Wien 29. November M.Hugo Windisch-Graetz 3 1682? Ruprechts Linie. – Des Stifters Enkel Christoph (+1549) hatte Zwei Söhne: Pankraz und Erasmus. Dieselben erlangen mit ihren Vettern von der jüngeren Linie d.d. Wien 7. Juli 1551 den Reichs- und erbländischen Freiherrnstand und d.d. Wien 24. November 1557 aber allein vom Römischen Koenig Ferdinand I. den Grafenstand für Reich und Erblande. Erstere war Kaiser. Reichshofrathspräsident, Hofmarschall, Geh. Rath und Oberstallmeister des Erzherzogs Carl und erhielt am 25. Juni 1565 mit seinem ganzen Geschlechte das Oberst-Erbland-Stallmeister-Amt in Kärnten. Pancraz starb 1511; merkwürdiger Weise hat sich Keiner seiner Nachkommen, noch auch der de Erasmus, des Grafen titels bedient, so dass des Letzteren Urenkel: der Kais. Reichshofrat, Kämmerer und Herr auf Trautmannsdorf, Gottlieb von Windisch-Graetz, Freiherr von Waldstein und im Thall (geb. 1630, +1695) erst d.d. Frankfurt a/Main 2. Aug. 1658 als „Graf v. Windisch-Graetz, Freiherr v. Waldstein und im Thall, Herr auf Trautmannsdorf“ das Grafendiplom für Reich und Erblande mit Titel „Hoch- und Wohlgeboren“, sowie der Erklärung, dass ihm dieser Stand bereits durch ein nicht ausgefertigtes Diplom Kaiser Ferdinand III. d.d. 8. März 1657 erteilt worden sei, erhielt. Derselbe wurde zuerst am 28. Januar 1684 als Personalist in das Fränkische Reichsgrafencollegium eingeführt, obwohl das Wetterauische Grafencollegium in bereits unterm 23. November 1664 mit Vorbehalt gehöriger Qualifikation aufzunehmen beschlossen hatte, ein Beschluss, der nicht zur Ausführung gelangt zu sein scheint; d.d. Wien 26 März 1689 erteilte Kaiser Leopold I. ihm noch das Böhmische Incolat. Er starb 1695; von seinen vielen Söhnen (aus 3 Ehen) hatte nur ein Sohn, Graf Leopold Johann Victorin, Kais. W. Geh. Rath und Reichshofrat, Finanz und Conferenzminister (+1746) dauernde Nachkommenschaft. Er erhielt d.d. Wien 14. Februar 1730 von Kaiser Carl VI. Das Grosse Palatinat (jedoch ohne Nobilitationsrecht) für ihn und den jeweiligen Erstgeborenen seiner Nachkommen. Bewilligung in Heil. Roem. Reiche und den Erbländern von seinen ererbten Gütern Titel, Stand und Wappen zu führen. Hergefallene und verwirkte Güter der Untertanen zu erben, Accise auf allerlei Getränke aufzusetzen, Bräu- und Schankhaeuser zu errichten; - Burgen, Schlösser etc. zu besitzen und sich davon zu nennen; - Befreiung von allen bürgerlichen Ämtern und auswärtigen Gerichten. Verleihung des Kaiser. Schutzes, Schirmes und der Salva Guardia; - Erstgeburtsrecht in seiner Familie einzuführen, -Graf – und Herrschaften im Reiche und den Erbländern zu besitzen, Asylrecht, Befugnis, die Jdenschaft in Betruegereifaellen zu überwachen, Jagd- und Fischerei – Gerechtigkeit. Mühlenbau; Hochgericht, Stock und Glgen zu errichten, Maut- und Zollfreiheit, Berechtigung von allerlei Urkunden glaubwürdige Transumpten und Vidimus zu machen. Schiedsrichter zu wählen, Privilegium de non susu, endlich Vewilligung Gold- und Silbermünzen zu schlagen. Sein Sohn Leopold Carl starb wenige Tage von ihm, am 12. Februar 1746; dessen Sohn erbte vom Grafen Losy die Herrshafte Tachau und Stickna in Boehmen und hinterließ bei seinem Tode 1802 u. A. zwei Söhne: Alfred und Weriand, die Stifter der noch gegenwärtig blühenden fürstlichen Zweige. Von diesen wurde Graf Alfred, nachdem er die zu Sitz und Stimme im schwäbischen Grafenkollegium und im schwäbischen Reichskreis berechtigende Gräflich Trausche Herrschaft Egloffs und die beim Reichsrittercanton Hegau immatrikulierte reichsunmittelbare Herrschaft Siggen erkauft hatte, d.d. Wien 24 Mai 1804 in des hl. Roem. Reiches Fürstenstand mit Wappenbesserung, Titel „Hochgeboren“ nach Erstgeborensrecht und Egloffs zu einem reichsunmittelbaren Fürstentum „Windisch-Graetz“ erhoben und durch die Rheinische Bundes- und Wiener Kongressakte dem Königreich Württemberg standesherrlich untergeordnet. Alfred jüngere Deschendenz, sowie sein Bruder Weriand war inzwischen im Grafenstande verblieben, aber, in Besitzes wurde er (als Oberst und Kommandant des k.k. Cuerassier – Regiment Nr.8) mit diesem und dem ganzen Hause durch Diplom d.d. Wien 18. Mai 1822 in den Österreichischen Fürstenstand erhoben und ihnen laut Beschluss der deutschen Bundesversammlung vom 16. August 1825 das Prädikat „Durchlaucht“ zuerkannt. Religion: Römisch-katholisch Titel: Fürst von und zu Windisch-Graetz Besitz: Fürstentum Windisch-Graetz , di Herrschaften Kladrau, Tachau, und Stikna in Boehmen, sowie bedeutende Besitze in Slowenien, Schloss Haasberg, Schloss Lueg, Schloss Gonobitz, Schloss Wiesell, Schloss Herberg, Schloss Slatenegg, Schloss Wagensberg, Schloss Bled. Wappen: Wir geben das berichtigte fürstliche Wappen und zur Vergleichung das der Gradner, welches durch Diplom de 1526 dem der Windisch-Graetz vereinigt wurde, nebst bei der 1. Abth. Hohen Adels diese Werkes über das Wappen Gesagte verweisen. J. Siebmacher’s (1887) M.Hugo Windisch-Graetz 4
Problems with upload of File:LUEG.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:LUEG.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC) --M.Hugo Fürst zu Windisch-Graetz 10:44, 16 April 2013 (UTC) [4]
Problems with upload of File:HAASBERG Castle.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:HAASBERG Castle.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest guideline
edit
Hello M.Hugo Windisch-Graetz. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Per favore, non contribuire a Wikipedia inglese modificando o inserendo testi utilizzando l'italiano. I contributi in italiano sono benvenuti sulla Wikipedia italiana.
Please do not contribute text in Italian to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at Italian Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Princess Maria Luisa Serra di Gerace
edit
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Princess Maria Luisa Serra di Gerace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Ian Spackman (talk) 12:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Apologies
editYour Serene Highness, By chance I was looking at the Windisch-Graetz article today and then came upon your article. Please accept my apologies for the rudeness with which another Wikipedia editor has treated you. No editor should be treated in such a way, but especially not somebody who has such a distinguished record of service to the Church. I will try to add some more appropriate references to your article (I'm sorry that the one on your mother was deleted so quickly). My mother is an old friend of your cousin Princess Olga (Riedemann). I remain, Your Serene Highness, your obedient and devoted servant, Noel S. McFerran (noel.mcferran@rogers.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.242.18.194 (talk) 05:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- LOL! gimme a break
Your contributed article, Mariano Hugo Fürst zu Windisch-Graetz
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Mariano Hugo Fürst zu Windisch-Graetz. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Mariano Hugo of Windisch-Graetz. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Mariano Hugo of Windisch-Graetz - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. LiteralKa (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Before adding any further information to Mariano_Hugo_of_Windisch-Graetz please could you familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policies on conflicts of interest and what Wikipedia is not. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Maria Luisa Serra di Gerace
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Maria Luisa Serra di Gerace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) (Shout!) 18:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
edit Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Mariano Hugo of Windisch-Graetz. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 13:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Bitte schreiben Sie hier keine Artikel auf Deutsch: dies hier ist die englischsprachige Wikipedia. Artikel auf Deutsch gehören in die deutschsprachige Wikipedia. Please do not contribute text in German to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the German Wikipedia. --Jac16888Talk 13:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Not so far they haven’t been ;) Ian Spackman (talk) 14:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
April 2011
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Mariano Hugo of Windisch-Graetz. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Please stop creating articles on members of your family. Your edits are not neutral at all, which is logical for articles on subjects so closely related to you. Fram (talk) 08:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
You have now created the same page at least four times, three times at Princess Maria Luisa Serra di Gerace, and once at Maria Luisa Serra di Gerace. You also created Hugo Veriand Prince of Windisch-Graetz, Maximiliano Hugo Prince of Windisch-Graetz, and Archduchess Sophie Franciska of Austria. If you continue with this blatant promotion of yourself and your family, instead of engaging in discussion with the editors who have expressed concerns over your edits, you will be blocked. Fram (talk) 08:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Also, in relation to your user page, please note that Wikipedia's user page policy includes:
"Generally, you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal website."
- and the list of "What may I not have in my user pages?" includes "Inappropriate or excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia." JohnCD (talk) 09:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prince M.Hugo of Windisch-Graetz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. This article was created, clearly in a spirit of wilful disruption, after you received friendly but clear warnings from Fram above, and from me below. Be clear. It does not matter whether you are the true aristocrat and ambassador, or an imposter. Either way, if you do not mend your ways you will be blocked. Ian Spackman (talk) 22:41, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- M.Hugo Windisch-Graetz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 82.61.145.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
[[WP:Disruptive editing|Disruptive editing]]: repeated posting of [[COI]] articles about his family
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
M.Hugo Windisch-Graetz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
THIS IS A WORKING PAGE AND THE INFORMATIONS ARE ALL COMING FROM PROVEN DOCUMENTATION
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- While you may remove warnings etc from your talk page, which is taken to mean that you have read them, you may not remove declined unblock requests while the block is still in force - see WP:BLANKING. JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
M.Hugo Windisch-Graetz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
All the material inserted in this page is part of my Family library and all the informations are correct and verifiable M.Hugo Fürst zu Windisch-Graetz 12:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Comment: To be suitable for an encyclopedia, it is not enough that the information is correct and verifiable. See:
- JohnCD (talk) 15:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Mariano Hugo of Windisch-Graetz for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mariano Hugo of Windisch-Graetz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariano Hugo of Windisch-Graetz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. pablo 22:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
M.Hugo Windisch-Graetz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
All articles are correct
Decline reason:
And still you're not allowed to promote yourself on Wikipedia. Max Semenik (talk) 12:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
File:SERRA DI GERACE TREE.jpg missing description details
edit
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)- ^ All the informations are real and correct coming from the library and historical certified informations about the Family
- ^ It is a document from our Family Archives with all the copyrights for publication
- ^ Family Tree of my Family made by Prince Francis Windisch-Graetz with all the rights of publication and in line with the Gotha
- ^ The photo is take privately by Prince Windisch-Graetz and it is representing the Castle of his property in Slovenia