M3b
Welcome!
Hello M3b, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
By the way, you can sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Maximusveritas 22:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi again, I don't know if you saw what I said on the discussion page for Rupert Murdoch, but you need to provide some sources to back up what you added in regards to the Mark Oaten incident. I would add some myself, but I'm sure you know more about it than I. Specifically, have you come across any articles that discuss the incident in more detail? Do you have any articles that discuss Murdoch's motivations? Adding such sources makes the article much more helpful and strong. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any questions. - Maximusveritas 21:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Reply to mv. Unfortunately the only to prove things like the mark oaten incident is a comprehensive statistical analysis of the political party of the victim and how this coincides with murdochs interests. I dont have this data or really the resources to collect it single handedly. Perhaps this makes the assertion unfounded, but the language of the paragraph is pretty ambivalent in any case. m3b
Speedy deletion of Emilio Salomon Larach
edit
A tag has been placed on Emilio Salomon Larach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RayAYang (talk) 01:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
The article Chomski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability issue raised in 2011 and not addressed.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keith 09:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Chomski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I failed to find any coverage of this piece of software in reliable sources and believe that it fails both the general notability guideline and the software-specific guideline.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chomski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.