User talk:M42380/Archive 2008

2008

Welcome!

Hello, M42380! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DeadmanUndertaker 14:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. I look forward to be working with you in the future. Here is some friendly advice; work in a good mature, take other users advice because it could help you. --michellekerchal (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages

Hi, welcome to WP and thanks for participating in WP:SOAPS. I wanted to make sure you know that talk pages are intended as a forum for discussion regarding the content of the articles themselves. Questions like your recent storyline/casting comments on the talk pages for Ethan Winthrop and Nash Brennan are really not appropriate here, unless your are questioning/clarifying specific text in the articles. Thanks. — TAnthony^Talk 02:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Grammar.

I ask that you please learn to use the english language in gramatically correct terms and use proper punctuation and spelling. This will prove useful if you plan to edit other people's work. Also please do not contribute to other people's articles if you are unclear as to the information wanted in them. For instance, you contributed to my article "current list of days or our lives characters." Now although baby joe johnson is a current character, his portrayer is not currently considered a contract player and therefore does not have his own entry. I also ask that when contributing to my work or works of others, that you follow the same format so as to not cause confusion. Thank you Phenomenon8980 (talk) 18:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I do know the english language. I was only adding to other peoples work because it need to be updated like all the others shows need. If Joe Johnson is part of the current character and if the portrayer is played by someone that the show has not told us it yet. I don't see the problem of it. --M42380 (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Current list of General Hospital, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello, M42380. You have new messages at Seth71's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

In all due respect, I seriously suggest that you brush up on basic English grammar and spelling before you attempt to give feedback and make edits on anyones page. Your use of the language leads me to believe that it is not your native language. Please take the time to proofread anything you edit and in addition, until you have a stronger grasp of the language, you should allow someone else with a better understanding of it to proofread your edits as well. Phenomenon8980 (talk) 18:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Regardless of your opinion of these editors' grasp of the English language, please keep your comments constructive; comment on edits and content, not the editors. The tone of your comment above feels like a personal attack. — TAnthony^Talk 18:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

User, Phenomenon8980, Just so you know that english is my only language and i just have a hard time of spelling words out. I am sorry if my mispelling is my only probelm but please email me. I justed started at a new school so i am a little scared.--M42380 (talk) 01:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

big brother 10

Hey just wanted to bring up what you said on the big brother 10 page, about waiting for the show to air before putting up who is nominated or who won the veto. I complained about it last year and tried to get them to stop adding that stuff, but I didn't win. I don't mind it now and I check the page all the time to see whose nominated. If you are still willing to fight for this, and have them to wait till the show airs, then you're going to lose. They won't budge. Seth71 (talk) 19:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I have decide to move on before you add the Big Brother 10 adivce. --M42380 (talk) 00:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Bringing Home Baby

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bringing Home Baby, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://tlc.discovery.com/guides/family/tlc-baby-block/bringing-home-baby/bringing-home-baby.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bringing Home Baby

A tag has been placed on Bringing Home Baby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement [tlc.discovery.com/guides/family/tlc-baby-block/bringing-home-baby/bringing-home-baby.html]. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --  Darth Mike  _{(Talk • Contribs)} 00:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

hey

If you mean zachinthebox, I know, me and him talk of what is happening on the show and everything through e-mail. Seth71 (talk) 20:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

have they decide about what they are going to? --M42380 (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

They're going to keep it the way it is. Like I said I tried to get it taken down last year and it didn't work. I like to know what happens before the show anyways now. Seth71 (talk) 17:27, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

me too. at least it was a try for getting them to stop. --M42380 (talk) 20:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Michael Corinthos

Do NOT delete the article of Michael Corinthos. He is worthy of his own article, and had more to do than linger around and be seen once or twice every six months. Dylan Cash was under contract for three years. So please, DO NOT delete the Michael Corinthos article. It was created way before Children of General Hospital was. I don't want to recieve help from an admin. Thank you. --OLTL2002 (talk) 06:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Michael is in a coma if you have not watch General Hospital and probrauly won't be coming back. --M42380 (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The GH Powers That Be has made it perfectly clear that when the time is right, Michael will be aged, and will awaken from his coma. And, that shouldn't and doesn't matter. There are legions of former GH characters with their own articles. And I suggest that if you are going to edit on WP, then you should learn proper spelling. Thank you. --OLTL2002 (talk) 03:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

sorry, that i am having problems spelling but i have had a long day. Michael is still his coma and the head writer said that they would not be bring him back for awhile. Until that time, Michael should be merage into Children of General Hospital. --M42380 (talk) 04:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, M42380. You have new messages at OLTL2002's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Common name policy

Hello, M42380. I moved Meg Snyder Ryan back to Meg Snyder due to the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) policy. It is the reason that the Carly Corinthos article is still titled by Carly Corinthos, instead of by whatever current last name she is sporting at the moment due to marriage, for example. If Meg Snyder started to be referred to as Meg Snyder Ryan so often that it became her common name as well, then it would be fine for her article to be titled Meg Snyder Ryan, in the same way that Kendall Hart Slater became a common name for Kendall Hart. Both Kendall Hart and Kendall Hart Slater are her common name.

Anyway, I'll see you around. Flyer22 (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

I was watching ATWT and Meg was on and it said that her comman name is Meg Snyder Ryan. --M42380 (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

That's not her common name; that's just her being referred to, one time, as Meg Snyder Ryan. That is her legal name, not her common name. Meg Snyder is her common name because that is the name she has been known by for years, and is most widely known by. Flyer22 (talk) 20:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Reese Williams

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Reese Williams, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lansing Family

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lansing Family, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 14:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lansing Family

I have nominated Lansing Family, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lansing Family. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Magioladitis (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

what you think is not what others think. --M42380 (talk) 22:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Spelling

Hey, M42380. I am not sure if English is your first language or not, but I wanted to advise you to make sure that your additions to articles are grammatically correct and spelled correctly. This is not to insult you; it is just that we have some editors at Wikipedia whose first language is not English and thus they often make grammatical and spelling errors while adding information to Wikipedia. If English is your first language, then I apologize if this offends you, but it is important to make sure that the stuff we add is correct grammatically and spelling-wise, along with being correct information-wise. Of course, there will always be the occasional typo, but it should not be often. And if it is often, it should be corrected as soon as we can correct these mistakes due to reading over our additions. You should always read over what you add to check for typos. Either that, or use some sort of spell checker first. I will say that I sometimes see that you do read over what you have added and then correct any mistakes in those additions. Besides that, though, the first part of headings on Wikipedia should always be capitialized (unless it is the name of something that is not capitalized). For example, it should be New news, not new news. We also should not add spoilers to Wikipedia, unless notable. See, WP:CRYSTAL.

Anyway, you are a good editor here, of course, and I'm just helping you out. I'll see you around. Flyer22 (talk) 20:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your adivce. just so you know that English is my first and only Language. I am just slow at spelling. --M42380 (talk) 00:26, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

If you ever need any help with anything here, just contact me on my talk page or e-mail me. Flyer22 (talk) 22:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

thank you. --M42380 (talk) 22:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Days of Our Lives unnamed baby vandal

I do not know why someone continues to speculate on the names of the unborn children, but if you look at the history, he/she has also vandalized Bo Brady, Hope Brady, Rex Brady, and Mimi Lockhart. Any thoughts as to how we should proceed? I left a warning on the IP page, but if it changes everytime, it is unlikely that the vandal will get it. Any thoughts? Rm994 (talk) 20:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

it just not those pages. it's all the characters that have been either miscarried or deceased or currently pregnant. I have caught the vandal User:85.226.75.245. I have already warn him once and just report him --M42380 (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Gabrielle Montgomery

New baby characters should not get articles here, unless they are notable. Notable, as in having valid articles and editors of valid sources outside of Wikipedia discuss the baby at length. Otherwise, what is the point of a baby character having an article? You need to be more careful with the articles you create here. You do not even add them to categories. Wikipedia goes on Wikipedia:Notability when creating articles, which is why the Reese Williams article could still easily be deleted since you have not added any notability to it. I will have to add notability to the Reese Williams article. While I could add notability to the Gabrielle Montgomery article, given the controversy that has surrounded this fictional baby, I will add that information to the Bianca Montgomery article instead. The Gabrielle Montgomery article will be redirected there. Flyer22 (talk) 04:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

why not redircted it to Children of All My Children.

Seems some other editor has done that. Also, I hope you do not mind, but I will be redirecting Reese Williams to Reese Williams and Bianca Montgomery (once I create the Reese Williams and Bianca Montgomery article). The reason is...Reese is mainly tied to Bianca and there's enough notability for that couple that I can add to an article about them. Reese does not have enough development yet to let her article continue to exist while the Reese Williams and Bianca Montgomery article also exists. Her article would mostly just be redundant information. Flyer22 (talk) 01:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

yeah i argee with that. I'll help as much that i can. --M42380 (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Reese Williams and Bianca Montgomery

I have nominated Reese Williams and Bianca Montgomery, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reese Williams and Bianca Montgomery. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 01:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I just created that page. Will you hold off on nomiated it for about an hour to get more information on it? --M42380 (talk) 01:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Why did you create this article? I said I would. And you know that I know how to add notability to articles. Flyer22 (talk) 06:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I was just trying to help you out. you don't have to be like that. --M42380 (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I do have to be like that, given what I told you above about how you need to be careful creating articles, about WP:Notability, and the fact that I was going to create this article.

That said, if you want this article to be kept, which it seems that you do, then you need to actually "vote" Keep in the deletion debate above and give valid reasons for keeping this article along with that "vote." Flyer22 (talk) 05:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Survivor Series (2008)

Don't forget about SS (2008) was yesterday and look for Cena's --M42380 (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

first Barnstar

		The Soap Opera Barnstar
		You have been awarded the Soap Opera Barnstar for your contributions to WP:SOAPS and soap opera-related articles on Wikipedia. 24.20.178.58 (talk) 00:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for all your edits. --24.20.178.58 (talk) 00:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Spoilers

Just a friendly reminder, we're not supposed to add spoilers to soap opera articles. I see that you changed Nicole Walker's baby from currently expecting to deceased...and that hasn't happened yet. It may or may not happen on today's episode, but per WP:CRYSTAL we can't add it until AFTER it happens. Keep up the great work!!! Rm994 (talk) 17:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

I thought that it did happen but i don't watch DAYS that much.--M42380 (talk) 23:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem. It happened today actually and I changed it back to the way you had it. Rm994 (talk) 04:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

thanks let me know if the problem that we had with the babies names apperaed again. --M42380 (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

I think it has been taken care of. Jayron32 blocked the range of IP's that were responsible for the edits, and protected Sami Brady, EJ Wells, and Nicole Walker from IP editing for a period of time. Thanks for your hard work! Rm994 (talk) 16:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

thanks, I had warned them many times about it and they didnot seem to lsten to me.--M42380 (talk) 00:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I did too...it is possible that he/she was simple not receiving our warnings because the IP changed everytime. But it seems all good now. Take care. Rm994 (talk) 03:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Spelling

Hi, thanks for your participation, I can tell you're very interested in soap articles and we definitely appreciate assistance in this area. However, I ask that you take more care with spelling and grammar in your additions, because correcting them creates more work for others. I think maybe you're just rushing and not watching your typing (note an example of my corrections, here). I haven't wanted to say anything until now because I didn't want to seem like I was nitpicking or being a jerk, but as you become a more active editor, the necessary corrections become more widespread. Thanks again. — TAnthony^Talk

okay thanks. --M42380 (talk) 15:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

TAnthony, would you please fill me in on the Randy sock case? there is a simluar problem on a different wikiapedia and I need to get know about it because there is a user that is getting into trouble for having one of the user names off of this wikipedia site. --M42380 (talk) 19:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello?!?!?!?!

Would you please stop deleting the characters on the soap characters. Ok. Thanks.72.173.36.70 (talk)

what are you talking about? --M42380 (talk) 19:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

You need to get a life and stop harrasing my soap characters as I am producer on ATWT and I gave promission for you to use the characters so leave them alone.72.173.36.70 (talk) 04:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

You are the one that needed to get a life. I am not harrasing soap characters. You came here to harrasing me and you don't even know if i am the only that is doing. --M42380 (talk) 15:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Why do we even have Lily Snyder if all we put on her page is who played her and not who she is.72.173.36.70 (talk) 19:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Soaps.com

Hello again, just to let you know, your recent edits to the Days of Our Lives cast member page regarding the departure of Deidre Hall and Drake Hogestyn were reverted because www.soaps.com is not allowed as a reference on wikipedia. References must be verifiable, and soaps.com is nothing but a fansite. If you can find another source, you can return the content. Thanks. Rm994 (talk) 07:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Soapcentral.com isn't really allowable either....but since two editors agree that is the date, I won't change it. If someone challenges it, we may have to remove. But for now, let's hope it stays. Thanks and Happy New Year! Rm994 (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Since when has Soaps.com or sopacentral.com reference. people use them all the time. So don't fed me with that crap.--M42380 (talk) 00:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Since at least January of this year. Just look at my talk page when I tried to use fan sites. People may be using them, but it violates WP:V. I didn't change it because I thought we agreed, but someone else challenged it, and changed it. I'm not trying to be difficult. I think you're a great editor, but rules are rules. Feel free to make the change as you see fit. Rm994 (talk) 04:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I received your message today. Just to let you know, I am leaving my response here. So forget about me answering to your message on my page and no, I will not let this go because I checked the page that you used as a source and it does not show the exact date that both Hall and Hogestyn are leaving. The site says they're leaving but no date has been set. Find me another source that says they're leaving on 01/23/09 and then I will let this go. So in the meantime, I WILL revert to the previous edit that I made and please don't even try to change it because I WILL see it. Thank you and have a Happy New Year! :) HabsMTL (talk) 02:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

IF you looked onto soaps.com it said Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I've gotten word that Deidre Hall (Marlena) and Drake Hogestyn's (John Black) last airdate is January 23rd. Let the countdown begin. M42380 (talk) 02:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello again...what I was told is that only soapoperadigest.com and Soap Opera Weekly are accepted. I don't quite understand why they are allowed and others aren't, but that's the rule. Hope that helps. Rm994 (talk) 22:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I'm coming into this late ... thanks for your continued contributions, but I wanted to first note that uncivil comments like "So don't fed me with that crap" are really not appropriate or helpful. Whether they are correct or not, Rm994 and HabsMTL have challenged your sources in a civil and constructive way, and the proper process is to discuss the issue civilly, not be dismissive and revert good faith edits, as has occurred in List of Days of our Lives cast members.

I personally feel that Soaps.com and SoapCentral.com can be reliable sources in certain cases, and your facts about Hall and Hogestyn appear accurate, but other editors have challenged these sources, and technically they have grounds to do so. In the future, please try to be a little more understanding, don't take these challenges personally, and most of all, don't edit-war or violate WP:3RR — this is too silly an issue to risk getting blocked! The truth is, in three weeks the John/Marlena info will be removed from the List of Days of our Lives cast members anyway, and better sources will presumably exist for their final airdates that can be included in their individual actor/character articles. It is really not worth fighting and edit-warring about.— TAnthony^Talk 07:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Just a friendly reminder, any information place in the comings and goings section of Days of Our Lives members section should be properly sourced...that is why it keeps being reverted. Hope this helps. Rm994 (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

You can't even speak english properly. Leave the page alone until you have credible sources for the babies who are coming to the show in 10 days. Thank you for understanding! :) HabsMTL (talk) 03:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

don't tell me that i can speak english. You need to leave things alone. You have the problem and you know it.

Happy Birthday

I saw that today is your birthday and i want to be the first on off of Wikipedia to say happy birthday.--MVHS2009 (talk) 01:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

January

Carly and Jax

Carly and Jax are NOT DIVORCED! They are estranged, according to Abc.com/daytime and according to the show, their divorce has been stulled! Thus they are not divorced. If the soap magazine is a spoiler, do not post spoilers on wikipedia. Also, as of today, they are still legally married. If you are a fan of the show, you'd realize that Alexis is Jax attorney and Carly has Diane, when they went to the divorce hearing Jax put a stull on the divorce to attempt to fix his marriage by simple "starting over". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.95.85.219 (talk) 20:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Leave it alone. It has been reported since December 2008 and it is staying that way.ABC.com/daytime is a spiolers. --M42380 (talk) 20:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

STOP POSTING FALSE INFORMATION! They are currently "estranged" not divorced. The magazine never stated clearly nor does ABC.com that they are getting divorced. In that same magazine, the Head-Writter says he has much more planned for "Carly and Jax as a COUPLE!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.95.85.219 (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

There was no false information. Jax told Kate himself that he was divorced from Carly in December. Leave it alone. I am willing to put them as dating but that is it. --M42380 (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

No, Jax told Kate he and Carly where going to get a divorce. Going to "get" and "having" one are two different things. Divorces don't happen over night and niether do they happen over night on soaps. And, how was he divorced in November if he stulled the divorce this January??? Duhh! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.95.85.219 (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

LEAVE IT ALONE. THEY ARE DIVORCED. THEY ARE ONLY DATING. DO it again, You will be blocked from here.

--M42380 (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

YOU LEAVE IT ALONE! YOU ARE POSTING FALSE INFORMATION! I'VE CONTACTED AN ADMINISTRATOR ONLINE, YOU ALSO WILL BE BLOCKED - DUE TO YOU POSTING SPOILERS AND POSTING FALSIFIED INFORMATION. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.95.85.219 (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

nice try, you see, you are the one that has been the posting false information. I have reported you to admin. They normally give an registed user a break rather than IP address. --M42380 (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Wait what, why did you leave me a message about some people being divorced? Deavenger (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, if you looked above i am currently being accursed of saything something that is true. --M42380 (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

About the Jax and Carly divorce, what episode did they say they were divorced in? Like I said on Jayron32's talk page, I'm not sure they are divorced. Every source I've seen points to them still being married. Rocksey (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not longer unsure. Carly and Jax are in fact still married. I edited both character's articles and added the sources that both characters stalled their divorce.Rocksey (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I do have a sign in name jackass..lol...dont get mad because you where wrong. You hate to listen. Carly and Jax...STILL MARRIED!!! Leave it at that.unsigned

Okay. I'm satisfied because I was right and I proved you wrong. Simple as that, you see Carly and Jax are still married..so leave it at that!!! NOW MOVE IT, since you so right??? HA!! TOLD YA SO! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AugustAugust (talk • contribs) 05:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't care about you. Just so you know that it is compelte childish to act the way that you are acting. Just grow up.--24.20.178.58 (talk) 00:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

You have a mental problem. and stop calling me names. I am not mad that i was not wrong. I do listen but went the IP vandal harressing users is not right.--M42380 (talk) 18:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

OK! Whatever man. I win Carly and Jax are still married. Bye NOW! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AugustAugust (talk • contribs) 02:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Grow up. You are comeptele a child acting skills are amazing.--M42380 (talk) 02:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

AugustAugust

• Stop Harrsing me.

M42380

• I'm not "harrassing" you, you where wrong about Carly and Jax and I can't believe you won't be man enough to admitt that you where wrong. You can't even say you weren't wrong because clearly, the couple is STILL MARRIED! Can you just be like "you where right, I apologize".

—Preceding unsigned comment added by AugustAugust (talk • contribs) 02:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Felicia Forrester

Regarding your removal of reference and notability tags from the article "Felicia Forrester", please abide by Wikipedia policy and do not remove such tags in the future unless the problem has been addressed. In this case it has not. Boston (talk) 04:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, i was trying to remove a different storyline that did not happen. I am sorry. I did not know that i had did that it. --M42380 (talk) 04:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

No worry. I apologize if I was brusque. - 20:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Carly Corinthos

They are talking about merging Carly Corinthos to Carly Corinthos Jacks.--michellekerchal (talk) 03:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Archive

Hey there, per your request I've put the ol' archive box on your page (I do mine a little differently, it's more of a hassle but I can show you if you want). In any case, I've got the initial archive page set to User talk:M42380/Archive 2008 and displaying as just "2008" (figuring that's what you're archiving), but didn't actually start it in case you want to change it. You can have as may as you want, and can number or name them however you want, like Archive 1 or Archive 2, or 2009A and 2009B, or by subject even, whatever. Hope that works out for ya ;) — TAnthony^Talk 04:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

thanks for your help.--M42380 (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

February

Nicole Walker

Your input is requested at the discussion page of Nicole Walker. Rm994 (talk) 04:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Spelling

As I've asked before, please take a little more care with your contributions; misspelling and bad grammar only create more work for other other editors, and your additions tend to be minor anyway. Day-to-day plot updates are unnecessary, but misspelled words just make it worse. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 17:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

On Trevor Lansing, someone said that he got shot before i corrected the page. You should look at the other person that added the fact that "Sonny had shot Trevor." --M42380 (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Soap opera dates/time

We do not always go by real-time dates when it comes to soap operas. The reason for that is because a day on a soap opera, as you know, often extends for two days or more in real time. It's best for us to wait and see on what day the show says Reese and Bianca are married, as in the storyline, or what day most of the soap opera media states as their marriage day. Flyer22 (talk) 05:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

March

Babe Carey image

The main image for her article was discussed before.

Furthermore, I do not see whatsoever how that faded-looking screenshot should be used over a promotional image. When the promotional image is fine, is better than a screenshot, and there is no warning to remove it, it should remain. It also makes no sense for Alexa Havins to have a screenshot as Babe while Amanda Baker has a big promotional image. Flyer22 (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Really, I need to find a smaller promotional image for Baker, or downsize that big one of her. Flyer22 (talk) 20:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

April

WP:TENSE

Fictional character histories/Storyline/Plot sections should be in present tense. Flyer22 (talk) 22:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

April and May

Bianca and Reese's marriage

Do you know for sure that Bianca and Reese are still married and never had an annulment or is this just another vandalism thing like you did with the Jax and Carly articles? Rocksey (talk) 17:43, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Don't mess with me today. I am not in the best of moods. Bianca and Reese are still married because Reese and Bianca are still wearing their rings. --M42380 (talk) 03:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not trying to mess with you, I'm trying to find out if you're telling the truth this time. If you recall, you continuously vandalized the Carly Corinthos and Jasper Jacks pages with false information that they were divorced, not too long ago. You even tried to remove sourced information that proved you were wrong. I'm just wondering if this is another time like that one. Rocksey (talk) 03:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

M42380, how do you know they are still married? Every source says their marriage was annulled. Has it been mentioned on air lately that they are still married? If not, then we should not put that they are still married. Flyer22 (talk) 04:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

It mention it a couple of days ago. I will look for the eposide that said that they are still married. --M42380 (talk) 15:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I did not see/hear it mentioned. And, apparently, neither did Rocksey.

Putting unsourced stuff in before you have the valid sources for it is not how Wikipedia works. You should not put that they are still married until you have a valid source for it. If you continue to do so, I will seek administrative assistance on this matter. Flyer22 (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

When knowning something that is true and I did read from soaps.com and I just have to find it. Don't threaten me for something that i know is true. --M42380 (talk) 03:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

You look at it as a threat, I look at it as following Wikipedia policy and making sure that things are true on Wikipedia. Soaps.com is not always correct. And if it was not stated on the show that Reese and Bianca are still married, it is not true. If this were an obvious case, where we all know that Reese and Bianca are still married, I would not suggest it be sourced. The on-air current status would be the reference. But we do not currently know if they are still married. What we do know is that Reese eventually gave into Bianca's demands of needing space, which presumably meant signing the annulment papers Bianca issued her. In addition, the media has reported their marriage as annulled or as them being divorced. The media could be wrong as well, but right now I am going with not having heard on air that Reese and Bianca are still married and with the media reports.

If you add that Reese and Bianca are still married, when, in actuality, they are not, I will find out about it. Flyer22 (talk) 03:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

and do what about it? I watched it when Reese was served and all she sign was giving up her rights to the baby. She never signed the papers that allunnes her marriage like Zendall did. --M42380 (talk) 01:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

And do what about it? Like I stated...revert you and report you. As for that other part, refer to all of what I stated above in this section. Flyer22 (talk) 03:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't care about a stupid marriage. --M42380 (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Must have fooled me then. Flyer22 (talk) 20:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

When I know that i am right and many other sites have them as still married. I never saw anything in ABC soaps or soaps in depth that said that they are divorced. I am willing to give up on and plus that I am having a little trouble in my personal life right now. The last thing is that I need is more stress.--M42380 (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Many other sites have them as still married? What sites? Most of them likely are not reliable by Wikipedia standards, and some of them probably have not updated their information on Reese and Bianca's relationship yet. The show led us to believe that Reese and Bianca's marriage was annulled, despite Reese still having referred to Bianca as her wife at one point a little before Bianca returned. Bianca wanted nothing to do with Reese when she left her. To believe that they remained married is to believe that Bianca was not serious about getting the marriage annulled and being away from Reese, and that Reese was not serious about giving Bianca all of what Bianca wanted at that time. Annulments do not take as long as divorces. And we know that, at that point, Bianca was serious about getting that marriage annulled and being away from Reese. She did not even visit Reese when Reese went temporarily blind.

If Reese and Bianca are still married, it will come out in the show eventually. Flyer22 (talk) 00:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Blood cloths?

What is this supposed to mean? Blood cloths? I'm assuming you mean blood clots, but you must be more careful with your additions to soap related articles. Wikipedia isn't a fan site. Please, please work on your writing, because right now what you're adding to Wikipedia is often suspect. That's harsh, and I'm sorry. Having said that, you seriously must improve on your writing/typing skills. AniMate^talk 07:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

okay. I am sorry. I was could not think of the way to spell and my mom is standing over my shoulder driving me nuts.--M42380 (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

More typos

Be more careful. This is yet another problematic edit. "...de los Reyes is best known for his portrays Antonio Vega..." This sentence makes zero sense with the changes you've made. "He was appeared on CSI: Mami on May 5, 2009." Same thing here, and I'm fairly certain there isn't a show called CSI: Mami. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I think something needs to change here. You must work on getting your subject and verbs to agree and you simply must stop putting typos like CSI: Mami and "blood cloths" into articles. Since you are struggling so much, perhaps I can point you towards the Simple English Wikipedia. That should give you some practice getting your English usage down without some of the complexities you will find here. AniMate^talk 16:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

okay sorry. I really need to read over the things that I type before I save the page. I was trying to say that He appeared on CSI Miami on May 4, 2009.--M42380 (talk) 16:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you really do need to read over the things that you type before you save the page. This has been going on since you first started editing here. Your first warning was back in July of last year. There have been regular complaints since then. Why should I believe that things will change now? AniMate^talk 16:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, do you understand why "...de los Reyes is best known for his portrays Antonio Vega..." makes no sense? AniMate^talk 17:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

yes I do and I have gotten better until i get stress out with is why as of today I am taking a weekend off and return on Monday to work on my spelling and reading sentences before I do and there has not been regular complaints since then. I have been told by one of my teachers at my school that I need to read everything that i say by sentence.--M42380 (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Enjoy your weekend off. I hope you don't think I'm picking on you, but this has got to change. There have been regular questions raised about your spelling and grammar. In addition to the one in July of 2008, I see the issue was raised in September, October, and December 2008, and now February and May of this year. As you're still in school, I really think the Simple English Wikipedia might be better. The sentence structure there is less complex and could give you a chance to develop your writing skills further. AniMate^talk 18:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

thanks for your adivce. I don't think that you are picking on me at all. I know that you are just trying to help. --M42380 (talk) 03:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Well..Well..

you see my name again! and if you where wrong, you where wrong! leave it at that! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AugustAugust (talk • contribs) 02:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

what are you talking about? move on from the past and get over it. I will report you again for harressement. Learn how to spell. --M42380 (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Rebecca Shaw

I just looked thru the Soaps.com recaps for GH for Thurs and Friday and see nothing about Rebecca being established as Emily's twin. Please provide a reliable source (and not Daytime Confidential) or wait to add information until it happens onscreen.— TAnthony^Talk 15:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

it states it on soapsdigest.com that it is revealed to Nikolas and Agent Ranier that Rebecca was sold of black market and that Emily is her twin sister.--M42380 (talk) 22:53, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Well then you need to learn how to cite sources. Technically, EVERY bit of information added to an article needs a source, including plot summaries. Editors tend to look the other way when it comes to information that is generally accepted to be true, but in the case of things that haven't happened yet, it is especially important. I saw the thing about Rebecca being Emily's twin myself on the cover of a magazine at the supermarket, but I don't know of a reference at the moment and it's not important enough to add without a citation. It disappoints me that editors such as yourself with an interest in the soap genre, good knowledge of the shows, and the time to edit here choose to merely add day-to-day factoids or update cast lists and infoboxes, when they could be actually improving articles. About 90% of current soap opera character articles fail notability requirements, are dangerously unsourced, or violate one or more other policies. This means they are just waiting to be tagged for deletion. Editors who care about these articles should be beefing them up with meaningful material, not tweaking their relatives in infoboxes. I enourage you to take a look at Pauline Fowler, an actual Featured Article, for the ultimate example of what a character article can and should be. There are many other articles, like Tina Lord or Jessica Buchanan, which are not as complete but are interesting compilations of notable information and well-defended against deletion. We have Soaps.com for lists of trivial connections and plot summary, Wikipedia is intended to be more substantive, and policies are in place to insure that it is. Which means, an article like Nicholas Newman, which is a loooong string of plot summary with no references or assertions of notability, is just a sitting duck for the next non-soap fan with a grasp on Wikipedia policy to come along and tag for deletion.— TAnthony^Talk 03:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

So what are we going to do about because Nikolas learns the truth by next friday. Are we going to keep it or leave it alone? --M42380 (talk) 15:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Buddy

Technically, you have no say in whether I consider you my buddy or not. You might not consider me YOUR buddy, but you're definitely my buddy! Moving on, it doesn't matter what your conspiracy theory view is on the topic of Jon and Kate. You can not use original research on Wikipedia, and unless you can provide a RELIABLE, VERIFIABLE SOURCE, your OPINION of the show does not matter. Further, you've warned people on your page to learn how to spell. I ask you, in return, to learn how to spell and use proper grammar. Many of your comments make very little sense to me. Have a great day...buddy. Wikiwikikid (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I know how to spell. --M42380 (talk) 18:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

• "Jon and Kate are faux to make more fans and when it plays out and the truth will come out" - This comment makes no grammatical sense. There's no such thing as being "faux to make." You're missing a comma between "fans" and "and." The second half of the compound sentence (after the missing comma) is actually a fragment (missing a predicate).
• "So until then, go luck." - You don't know how (or didn't bother to?) type "good" correctly ("good luck").

These were comments you left me. Here's a few from comments you left other editors. Wikiwikikid (talk) 19:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

• "daytime is a spiolers." - Do you mean "are spoilers?"
• I am willing to put them as dating but that is it" - Again, you are missing a comma. This time the missing comma belongs between "dating" and "but."
• "I have reported you to admin" - Do you mean "to an admin?"
• "Sorry, if you looked above i am currently being accursed of saything something that is true." - "Accursed" is a real word, but you probably meant "accused." "Saything" is not a word. "That is true" probably should have been that ISN'T true.

This was just a small subset of your actual contributions. As you can see, your contributions are full of spelling and gramatical errors. This is fine... other than the fact that made it a point to berate other editors.

Further, other editors have made it a point to out your problems with grammar and problems with spelling before. This all having been said, if you're going to berate others for their spelling and grammar, perhaps you should fix your own first! Wikiwikikid (talk) 19:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

So what, I don't really care. I know that I have spelling problems and I don't need you or anyone else to point that out. Some of the others users don't even get their spelling is horrible, So who are you to just yelled at me for it?--M42380 (talk) 19:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Kind lady, I am merely suggesting that you not be a hypocrite. This dude named Jesus once said "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?" I guess I agree with that comment. Wikiwikikid (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I am not acting a hypocrite or whatever you said. It is not right to judge someone by the book of the cover and complain of someone’s spelling. Jesus never said and I know this because I go to church. I have different beliefs then you do. --M42380 (talk) 20:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

If you are berating people for using bad spelling when you use it yourself, you are being a hypocrite. I'm not judging you, your cover, or anything else. You just said "It is not right to... complain of someone's spelling" but my point is that YOU have done the exact same thing in this edit. As for knowing what Jesus said because you go to church, I have a question for you... Do you go to a CHRISTIAN church? Does your church believe in the Bible? If so, read MATTHEW 7:3-5. It says, "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?" I thought you said Jesus didn't say that? According to the Bible he did... Wikiwikikid (talk) 20:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I go to Living Hope Church which is the fast growing church in the northwest. Yes, We do believe in the bible but we are a church that does not judge others on the way to appear. --M42380 (talk) 21:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

The fact remains that JESUS did say it (I merely quoted him), so you were WRONG in saying that he didn't. Further, I'm not judging you. In fact, I'm trying to get you to stop judging others. You tell other people to fix their spelling when your own spelling is terrible! and in response to your comment at my talk page:

• "You don't know what he did before that, You should not be calling me names or I'll report you for it and just so you know that your talk page doesn't belong to you. It's belongs wikipedia. --M42380 (talk) 21:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)"
  • I DO know what he did before that (history), however, I don't need to know what he did before that. I know that you have bad spelling/grammar, and I know that you tell other people to learn how to spell. That is hypocrisy. Please report me! You'll be wasting your time. I haven't called you ANY names or done anything wrong. I'm merely trying to provide you with suggestions to improve your quality as an editor, buddy. And just so YOU know, you've already had one admin (SheffieldSteel) explain to you that I am free to delete anything I want from my talk page.Wikiwikikid (talk) 13:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I have also talked to other admins saying that user talk pages are not the user's page. Who freaking cares what you think about my spelling? I don't have to sit here and listen to you anymore. Forever more, I am not your buddy and personally I don't want to be. --M42380 (talk) 00:29, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Whatever your opinion of another editor, please don't revert their edits to their own user talk pages. There are almost no circumstances in which this is the right thing to do. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 18:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

then why did I get yelled at for doing it before? --M42380 (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Your user page

The amount of information contained on your user page may lead to unwelcome attention in real life, particularly since you state that you are young and female. You've provided enough information to make it relatively easy for anyone to track you down, and I would urge you to at least consider deleting some or all of the infobox content. Even if you do that, your edits would still be visible in the page history - but if you want, I can delete the edits so only admins can see them. Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 22:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, please. The last thing that I need is to be track down and being stalked. --M42380 (talk) 22:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I've deleted the article and restored the other info. As you'll see if you click on "user page" and "history", the older versions of the article are invisible except to administrators. However, there are over 1,600 of us. I'll need to go up the chain of command a bit to close that loophole for you. Bear with me :-) SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 22:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

okay. thanks for your help.I do have one more thing to say. There is another user name AugustAugust and he came back and started up his attacks on me. Could you warn him please? --M42380 (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll certainly look into that. Unfortunately the servers are really busy (what with the whole Michael Jackson thing), but I'm patient :-) Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 22:22, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

what happen to Michael Jackson? --M42380 (talk) 22:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm not sure. He's had a heart attack, and been taken to hospital, but he may or may not have made it. As for this AugustAugust person... they seem to have left Wikipedia for the time being. If you have any more trouble from them, drop me a note on my Talk page and I'll take care of it. Signing off for now... SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 22:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help.--M42380 (talk) 22:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

wikiwikikid

Please do not post to their talk page anymore. I've made the same request of them. Your continued interaction is disruptive. In particular, if you keep unduing their edits to their talk page, you'll likely find yourself blocked. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

The point that I have been told that you don't own your own talk page. I don't think that user be able to still do that. I have been told by one of my friends that she was yelled at by doing that and now she is blocked for some old reason. --M42380 (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

He is allowed to blank his own talk page. Your "friend" is wrong, and I suggest you stop listening to friends who are blocked; by definition, they obviously don't understand policies. You are allowed to remove content from your talk page as well if you want. But seriously, you two need to find something else to do. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

okay, I will tell her that she was wrong. --M42380 (talk) 00:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, maybe you can explain something. You say your "friend" got yelled at and was blocked, but I notice earlier, you said "you" got yelled at for blanking a talk page. I don't see that anywhere, who yelled at you for blanking your page, and where? Please answer soon, I have a feeling you are your "friend", and you're a blocked user evading a block. Can you come up with another explanation for your comments that I'm missing? If I don't hear from you soon, I guess I'll have to report you at WP:SPI; I hate to have to go to that much effort, but if nothing else it annoys me when someone thinks I'm stupid and lies to me. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, my friend was on my page eariler and I did not know that she did that. --M42380 (talk) 00:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

For future use, in your next socking adventure, it's common practice to say your younger brother did it, not your friend. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:55, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

FYI, I don't have an younger brother. I have older sister and that is that.--M42380 (talk) 00:57, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Taking a break off

I need very break off from this website, I am going to be gone until Harry Potter comes out. So I can deal with my issues that I have. My uncle has said that he is going to help me with my spelling and grammar before the state test so that is what I am going to do. I am sory if I have offended anyone. Peace out until then --M42380 (talk) 04:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

JR Chandler and Annie Lavery

A single kiss is not a romance. And when you see an unencyclopedic section in these soap opera character articles, such as "Relationships," remove them...unless they are actually well-sourced text that is more than a list. Flyer22 (talk) 04:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

okay thanks for your help. I was not the one that added the relationship to Annie Lavery. --M42380 (talk) 03:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:Infobox soap character#Relationship parameters

Hey, I reverted your edit to the Sharon Newman article because it went against the soap opera character infobox perameters. You should familiarize yourself with this style. See you around. Rocksey (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

M623

So do you have some connection to User:M623? — TAnthony^Talk 19:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

No, I don't. I know that it is confussing but I have no connection to that person.--M42380 (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I doubt that M42380 is a sockpuppet of Randy; their editing styles and grammar/punctuation when editing articles is completely different. Flyer22 (talk) 10:34, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

M42380, I'm certainly not accusing you of anything because I have no evidence or indication that you are a sock, but I had to ask the question because of the similarity in usernames, and the fact that you seemed to have crossed paths in the soap article arena. As you may know, we were all recently shocked to find here that M623 was one of several socks of "Leslie Roak." See you around ;) — TAnthony^Talk 20:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

I know that. She's on soap.wikia.com now and GH wiki right now. --M42380 (talk) 15:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Fictional truth or just plain fiction?

This edit isn't exactly the truth, is it? Would you care to explain why you're making up plot points? AniMate^draw 23:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

There is no way that Emma shot Stuart. The shot came from window and not the main room.Back when Zach shot the window to frame Annie. The shot was in the same area and making it so that Zach is the one that shot Stuart and not Emma and Annie Lavery. Emma saw it.--M42380 (talk) 16:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, thank you Miss Marple. You solved the crime! However, I don't recall seeing anywhere in our verifiability policy that states your deductions equal facts. Are you a reliable source now? Perhaps its a good idea to stick to what we know for a fact and leave the sleuthing to Pine Valley's finest. I'm sure that when they crack the case you'll be able to let all of us know that you figured it out first. Still, until the killer is revealed on screen, let's not put our assumptions into articles. AniMate^draw 04:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Kate Roberts

Just to let you know, I changed Kate Roberts back because that has been her common name on the show. Per WP:COMMONNAMES, she must be referred to as Roberts. When the show refers to her as Kate DiMera, we can change it back, citing the source. So far, it has not been mentioned. Thanks for understanding. Have a great weekend. Rm994 (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Okay. I don't get to watch it--M42380 (talk) 13:20, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

I think you're wrong

SOAPnet lists the name as Josslyn. Soaps on ABC calls her Josslyn. Do you have any sources stating that it is Jocelyn instead? AniMate^draw 20:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, this was way over the line. The user made one edit and you threatened to report them. And they were right. ABC confirmed it. Twice. AniMate^draw 02:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

• Soaps cearly states that her name is Jocelyn not Josselyn on their thing. I don't go onto it. --M42380 (talk) 18:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

I assume you mean soaps.com. I don't know how they clearly stated Jocelyn, but in this recap they spell it Josslyn. If you don't go onto the site and haven't actually verified the spelling, why in the world were you making such a big deal out of this? AniMate 21:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

okay. I cleary said that I was sorry on the IP address. I was wrong. --M42380 (talk) 14:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

ALL ARCHIVE PAGES ARE MINE TO DO WHAT I PLEASE WITH THEM; DON'T CHANGE THEM AFTER I SEND THEM HERE~

Elimation chamber

Don't forget to look on who won the WWE championship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.178.58 (talk) 19:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Februaury/March 2010

Bad edits

Not sure what you were trying to do with this edit, but cut it out. You removed several referenced edits and the reference section despite there still being references in the article. AniMate 06:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

I just noticed this gem from earlier this month. Carly was second pregnancy was in 2000... Both Sonny and Carly were both hurt... Carly lost the baby in March after explosion... Way to fix the typos. AniMate 06:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

For Children of General Hospital, I am in the midest of rewriting the article that my friend wrote. Someone decided with out talking about to take off Morgan, Kristina, and Michael on the talk page. That's all i was trying to do. --M42380 (talk) 15:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

By "midest", I'm guessing you mean "midst", and when you removed all of those characters you completely screwed up the references. Despite repeated requests from me, you came back today with this edit. By "stem mom" I suppose you mean "step mom". You also failed in regards to subject-verb agreement. "It is revealed that JR's stem mom Annie Chandler and his half-brother Miguel is a match". "Is" is not the right verb there. Making this sentence as simple as possible, but still using your verb: "It is revealed [they] is a match". The correct verb there is "are". You make these mistakes consistently. Perhaps you are unaware, but in most browsers typos like "midest" are underlined in red or highlighted to show that the word might be misspelled. Also, if you use save a page here, perhaps you could look one button over. It says "show preview". You could use that button to preview what you've written and catch any typos you might have left. Another thing to think about when previewing is reading what you've written out loud. If it sounds wrong, it likely is wrong. Please be more careful. AniMate 03:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I know that I have issues with my spelling and grammar. I get that you are trying to help me with it. I am working on that problem daily and trying to get better at my spelling and grammar. Thanks --M42380 (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010/May 2010

Dolls

Explain how in the world a doll is an actress. Also, do you have any proof that they used dolls for the baby? A doll is a prop not an actress. Use common sense. AniMate 21:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Kristina was too premature to be played by an actress. I do use common sense. --M42380 (talk) 13:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

A prop can't play something. It's just a prop. Do you really, really feel it is necessary to have the actors for these characters listed in three different places? And if so, why? If people want to find out about these more notable characters and the actors who portrayed them, they can click the character. AniMate 00:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

It's not right for Kristina to be the only one without the people that played her. Kristina is not a notable character. She's a child. We had her actresses information on there before it was mess up with some person who does incompelete sentences and It was not me. I feel that it's important to have her actresses on the page along with everyone else. --M42380 (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

As you know, Kristina isn't the only character without all actors listed. I removed Michael as well. Since those two characters have their own pages, they need the least amount of detail. If you want to add check that all the actors are listed go to Kristina Davis and Michael Corinthos. Also you can see them at List of General Hospital characters. The Children of General Hospital article is long enough as it is, let me try to keep it streamlined. Have you considered the possibility that I might know what I'm doing? I'm an administrator here, and an administrator who has consistently had to clean up your spelling mistakes and poor sentence structure. Leaving these actors off the list isn't taking anything away from the actors or characters. It's allowing further development of the characters who don't have individual articles by minimizing the information about characters that do have their own articles. Please don't fight me on this. AniMate 18:17, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Children of General Hospital part 2

THEN WHY NOT TAKE ALL OF THE ACTORS OFF THE PAGE????? IT NOT MAKE SENSE TO LEAVE THE OTHERS ALONE AND KRISTINA AND MICHAEL OFF!!--M42380 (talk) 21:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)I'm sorry for the writing in Caps. Here the issue that I have, One I believe that the article was created by user:Jeanan34 and I don't know if the user would wanted the page like that. There is a page that disucss everything. And I normally clean up my own spelling mistakes sometimes.--M42380 (talk) 21:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

it's not User:Jeanan34 it's user:jenan34. If you are going to get me involed on this then you should at least put my user name right. --Jenan34 (talk) 21:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for that help. I did not remember how to spell your name right. I'm sorry if I spelled it wrong. --M42380 (talk) 21:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps one or both of you could explain why you feel the need to list these mostly not-notable actors three different places in the encyclopedia. I'd love to hear an encyclopedic, non fan based answer. My rationale is from Wikipedia:Summary_style:

Wikipedia articles tend to grow in a way which lends itself to the natural creation of new articles. The text of any article consists of a sequence of related but distinct subtopics. When there is enough text in a given subtopic to merit its own article, that text can be summarized from the present article and a link provided to the more detailed article.

We have a summary of the characters, and I don't think a list of babies and non-contract kid actors who will never warrant articles here is a necessary part of the summary. AniMate 22:05, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Typos part ???

Sonny and Carly reunited once more over what happen with Michael. Carly tells Sonny that she wants Jax to adopted their son, Morgan.

I'm really getting tired of cleaning up after every edit you make. There are three typos in the above addition you made to the article on Carly Corinthos. You didn't put a space between Sonny and the period from the sentence before, "what happen" should be "what happened", and "wants Jax to adopted" should be "wants Jax to adopt". Every editor here makes typos, but you make typos every time you edit. It's getting ridiculous and no matter how many times I come here to help you continue to do so. Perhaps Simple Wikipedia would be better for you, since they focus on short, simple sentences. Alternatively, you can check out this General Hospital wiki, where editorial standards are lower. AniMate 03:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

So is the fact that wikiepdia is supposed to be free for everyone to edit from. I know that I don't the prefect spelling and grammar and I DON"T NEED IT FROM YOU TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You don't have to keep correcting me or telling me that I make mistakes. No one is prefect in this world. I am not going going to the General Hospital Wikia. Those people are rude and copycats. It's destorys everything that I beleive in. I am working on my spelling and grammar. Normally I have a word page open to help me. But understand this, I don't need it from you. I get every single day from everyone else. --M42380 (talk) 13:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

I know you don't want to hear it, but AniMate has a point. We value everyone's contributions (so long as they aren't vandalism), but why should someone have to follow behind you and fix every mistake that is made? You said above that people "don't have to keep correcting me...", but if spelling, grammar, capitalisation, or whatever mistakes are being made, then yes, someone does have to correct them. Just slow down, re-read everything you do, and focus on making shorter edits that are easier to handle. It certainly isn't a judgment against you, but it is a desire to make sure the material on Wikipedia is of the highest quality possible. Put it this way: would you respect a website that had random errors all over its pages? — Huntster (t @ c) 05:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

(Responding to a message on my talk page.) Hello M42380. I'm afraid I have to agree with AniMate and Hunster. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia must adhere to strict grammatical standards. If you have trouble with spelling or sentence construction, try taking a bit more time before saving your edits. Read over what you've written (or ask someone else to), make sure the spelling is correct (you can use a word processor), and then make the edit. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 05:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I get the point. I'm working on my spelling and grammar. I get everyone's point but I am sick and tired of hearing things over and over again. Another thing with the General Hospital Wikia, I was taught that it was wrong to copy things that you don't write the whole thing. That is why I don't want to be part of the website.Huntster, I get what you are saying and you're right about it.I am going to make sure that I go over everything that I write and make sure that up to your standards. --M42380 (talk) 13:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Good deal, M42380. As I indicated before, don't let this discourage you. In the end, this may help you become a better all-around writer. :) — Huntster (t @ c) 18:17, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I have another suggestion, I think I've made before. After typing your addition, hit the "show preview" and read it out loud. Often times what looks right on the page is revealed to be wrong when we hear it read aloud. AniMate 06:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you for all you have done to help me out.--M42380 (talk) 14:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Bianca Montgomery main image

Hey, M42380. I felt that you should be alerted of the following discussion on my talk page: User talk:Flyer22#Eden Riegel interview. In that discussion, we talk about whether or not to keep Eden Riegel as the main Bianca image, due to the recast. We decided that it is best to keep Riegel as the main image, because she is the most notable and recognized as Bianca. But because you sometimes edit the Bianca Montgomery article, and may also want to change the image once Lind appears as Bianca onscreen, I felt that you may want to comment on it (there on my talk page). Flyer22 (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Children of Days of our Lives

An article that you have been involved in editing, Children of Days of our Lives, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of Days of our Lives. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 05:32, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Duggars

If you're talking about the part I deleted on Josie getting her first piano lesson, TLC hasn't listed that episode yet.

Like I said before, she's only 13 months old, how can she be learning the piano, lol? GiantTiger001 (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

No I haven't. Thanks for clearing that up. Though I wouldn't exactly say she's learning the piano, lol! GiantTiger001 (talk) 20:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't subscribe to TLC, wish I did. I'll have to check out their website and see if it's on there. Sometimes, I find episodes on YouTube or on Torrent websites, if I'm lucky.

I wish I did have TLC, because I'm curious to know if baby #20 is on the way. Every time Anna's pregnant, Michelle is pregnant. If there is another baby on the way, I hope it's a girl. That would give them ten boys & ten girls. GiantTiger001 (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the 411. It would be funny if Michelle was pregnant at the same time as Anna again. Maybe have her 20th (and possibly last) baby in Febrary 2012. It's one of the three months she doesn't have a kid's birthday. February, June & September, not to mention Josh is the only who is born in March. GiantTiger001 (talk) 18:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Kate Plus 8

I will tell you the same thing that I told user Baylix.

Originally TLC probably intended for "Gosselins, Goblins & Ghouls" to a season 2 premiere but at the last minute changed their minds or made a mistake with their information for this episode.

I'd like to also point out that when this new episode airs, it'll have been 4 1/2 months. Why would TLC wait so long between episodes for the same season?

TV Guide called the Halloween episode a special, which is what TLC intended it be after all. Since then, I have found two different website saying that the new episode scheduled to air on April 4 is the season premiere episode. Unless of course, you believe that there was only one episode for season 2? I think it's safe to assum this isn't the case.

Here's the two websites that call it a "premiere" plus EW.com. Tell me how can two different websites be wrong about the premiere?

http://popwatch.ew.com/2011/03/10/kate-plus-8-returns-april-4-but-do-you-care-anymore/

http://gosselinfamilyfansite.blogspot.com

The Halloween is *not* a season premiere episode, or there would have been more episodes, last December.

As for the Duggars, I only changed that because I hadn't seen the episode at the time. Since then it's been on YouTube and all I've seen is Josie's feet on the piano, but I'm leaving that alone. GiantTiger001 (talk) 04:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC) http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com GiantTiger001 (talk) 04:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Check out the show's Facebook page. It says on there "season 2 premiere", right under the photos from Australia. I'm guessing TLC orginally planned for "Gosselins, Ghosts & Ghouls" to be the season premiere and "Australian Adventure" to be season 2, but they changed their minds and forgot to update their website.

Also, I think I've pointed this out before. That *special* aired on a Sunday, instead of Monday, like season 1 & 2 have. There's also that fact that it's been five and a half months. You don't have a season premiere and the decide to wait that long for the rest of the episodes - for any show. GiantTiger001 (talk) 18:01, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

The Halloween episode is like a piece of the puzzle. It fits with specials, not season 2 episodes. If it were then why did the show post this on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=732579610&ref=ts#!/album.php?fbid=10150114354480678&id=33660480677&aid=277557 ? Only TLC can post those pictures, not anyone who is on FB. GiantTiger001 (talk) 17:04, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011

• Keep posting messages under March until Friday; April 1, 2011

WP:Twist of Kate

If your intention was to send Twist of Kate to AFD, please follow WP:AFD#How to list pages for deletion. Simply south...... digging mountains for 5 years 13:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Hello, M42380. You have new messages at Musdan77's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Survey

Hi M42380!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 03:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lucas Horton did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You do not need to list whether or not fictional characters are "deceased" - As they are fictional - the real world perspective is that the characters will always exist as you can watch the work at any time. Fictional characters dying is an in universe aspect and inbox's are to help summarize the notable aspects of the character in a concise manner. In addition - please do not add excessive information as this clutters the box with information that is not needed to help the general reader. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. You can consider this your first and final warning about this issue. Don't just edit without thinking or following the rules. Make the edit again, you'll be reported. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Consensus

xWe need your help to come to a consensus on Talk:List_of_The_Young_and_the_Restless_characters_(2010s) for Ricky Williams. Arjoccolenty (talk) 22:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of United Bates of America episodes

The article List of United Bates of America episodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recently created article with no references. Delete as per WP:TOOSOON.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Maxie Jones, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Musicfreak7676 ^{my talk page!} 17:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi M42380! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of General Hospital characters (2010s), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi M42380! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by: Visiting our website for resources, events, and more Meet other women and share your story in our profile space Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience! Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)