MChGilbert
MChGilbert, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi MChGilbert! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Geophagus neambi has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Geophagus sveni has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 21:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Brama caribbea moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Brama caribbea, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 18:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
@Willbb234: I have made additional edits and expanded the literature cited. I would appreciate it if you could take a moment to review the changes. Please let me know if you still have concerns and I will do what I can to address them. Cheers. MChGilbert (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Giles W Mead jr moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Giles W Mead jr, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 18:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Brama dussumieri moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Brama dussumieri, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 18:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
@Willbb234: I have made additional edits and expanded the literature cited. I would appreciate it if you could take a moment to review the changes. Please let me know if you still have concerns and I will do what I can to address them. Cheers. MChGilbert (talk) 18:34, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
editPlease do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please provide sources to meet WP:GNG. Also, I don't know why you keep on providing publications by a particular scientist, please provide a range of sources to satisfy WP:V. Cheers Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 18:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
@Willbb234: All information that I have added - anywhere - are from reliable, peer reviewed publications in scientific journals, so I am not sure to what you are referring to when you instruct me to provide sources. Data on this family are limited, much of the work was done by Giles W Mead jr. In 1972, Mead published a substantial monograph on the entire family that encompassed all researchable aspects at the time. The single monograph provides indepth information and, for the most part, contains the majority of what we know about the family. Seeing as he did nearly all of the work relating to the family Bramidae, it seems only appropriate to cite him when this family is discussed. In short, there is not a great deal of information regarding the family as a whole and much of what we do know comes from that monograph - or is based in his work. I will admit, I am still figuring out the ins and outs of editing Wikipedia, since I am a new user. I appreciate the feedback and, hopefully, I will be able to track down additional publications to satisfy your concerns. Cheers. MChGilbert (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Brama caribbea has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Giles W Mead jr
editHello, MChGilbert. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giles W Mead jr".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 08:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)