ME Researcher
|
Speedy deletion nomination of "Nothing but a Miracle"
edit
A tag has been placed on "Nothing but a Miracle" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 13:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
November 2013
edit
Hello, I'm Beeblebrox. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Moose without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- i see that you did leave a comment on the talk page, but your comment rather misses the point of what the material you removed is for. A WP:HATNOTE is a way of letting a reader know what to do if they arrive at a page after searching a term, only to find it is not the page they were looking for. It is a navigational aid to help readers who may be a bit lost. So, someone looking for information on the Bull Moose Party might just type in Bull Moose and find themselves looking at the article on the animal, and the hatnote tells them how to find the content they were actually looking for. And you did not address in your remark that the term Alces, which is part of the scientific name for a moose, also redirects there and the hatnote also explained that there was disambiguation page if you happened to be looking for one of the other meanings. And finally, you also removed a valid page protection template with your edit, which is a way of informing users that the page is currently under a form of edit protection. So, you did not remove an explanation of why a moose is not a political party, you removed three pieces of information that were there to help our readers navigate and understand the project. Please be more careful in the future. thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- You may also find it useful to get up to speed on Wikipedia talk page guidelines as your remarks were misplaced and unsigned, both of which have now been rectified. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sulfoxaflor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sulfoxaflor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sulfoxaflor may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit
Hello, ME Researcher. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)