MITBeaverRocks

Welcome!

I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REMOVE COMMENTARY THAT I DEEM OFFENSIVE

MIT Nobel edits

Madcoverboy (talk) 07:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for your zeal and determination in updating Nobel Laureate affiliations.Madcoverboy 08:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Dominic Barton

(In case you're confused, I'm referring to this edit of yours.)

Well, I agree that there's little doubt that he's "notable"! I'm rather surprised no-one has written the article yet ... Your thoughts? Pdfpdf (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I know many famous people in the "private" sector who usually doesn't attract public and media attention; therefore, not much is written about then on Wikipedia. However, if you Google him, you will find many articles about his work at McKinsey, and you can write him an article? MITBeaverRocks (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geoffrey von Maltzahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Berry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:EurekafestSpeakerVonMaltzahn.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:EurekafestSpeakerVonMaltzahn.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA _talk^edits 04:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

File:EurekafestSpeakerVonMaltzahn.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:EurekafestSpeakerVonMaltzahn.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MITBeaverRocks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

"Mit ranks" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mit ranks. Since you had some involvement with the Mit ranks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shadowssettle_(talk) 15:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)