MMyll

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, MMyll. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Conflict of interest declaration

I have moved your conflict of interest declaration to your user page - that is the userbox's proper location. If your article is accepted and published in the main article space, then please change the link to point to the article. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Zangwills (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Zangwills and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Zangwills, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, MMyll! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi MMyll! You created a thread called New contributor, not sure what happens next at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Zangwills has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Zangwills. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Zangwills has been accepted

The Zangwills, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 15:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Kvng, I hope you are well. Since we last spoke, I have aimed to refine and improve the article for The Zangwills. As advised, it now includes citations from various national and international publications including the NME. There is also a link between Game of Thrones actor Maisie Williams page and the band's as she produced the official music video for their song Judas on the Dancefloor, along with BAFTA-winning Director Lowri Roberts. I hope therefore that it might be possible to review the page and consider the removal of the template regarding notability criteria. I don't feel this is something I can undertake due to my stated conflict of interest but I'd be very grateful if you could perhaps take a look or pass it on for consideration.

As always, please feel free to share your wisdom on any further action or recommendations, it's always appreciated. Take Care & All Best Wishes, Jackie MMyll (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi MMyll! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Possible removal of notability guideline template from top of article page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)